Those IMPLAUSIBLE & IMPOSSIBLE cellphone calls

[ImpWizard]

Since the subject of this thread is the cellphone calls, and none of the Magic Arabs nuts has been able to prove they're possible, maybe they should either

a) Admit that they're wrong

b) Get on with proving otherwise instead of avoiding the issue because they have nothing to back their assertions that the cellphone calls were possible.

 

[phrodeau]

Just noticed your strawman argument there, Lovelynice doesn't say that about WTC 7, she says it about the WTC towers. Drop the crap.

You should check her sig if you want to see the WTC tower explosions going off in long neat lines florr-by-floor (or watch Loose Change), it's in Lovelynice's sig under Boom-boom-boom, there's a few video downloads on that page near the top. You can look anytime. You probably have seen them already. I doubt that you'll look. This is just one of your excuses

LN (A she? Are you certain?) maintains that WTC7 was a controlled demolition. LN maintains that the proof of this is in the line of explosions visible on footage of the collapse of the towers (either WTC1 or WTC2).

That doesn't work for me, somehow.

 

[Fagin]

The truth has been proved. "Magic Arab" version (warning #1: .pdf - warning #2: it doesn't support the "government did it" therefore it will be ignored)

The burden of proof of the crazy "government did it" is up to the nuts to prove, which they haven't. The "you can't trust the government and they needed a reason to go to the war" arguement doesn't hold water without something to back it up.

 

[Fagin]

LN (A she? Are you certain?)

Certain in the inverse of that. LN is a guy, look at the writing style.

 

[phrodeau]

The truth has been proved. "Magic Arab" version (warning #1: .pdf - warning #2: it doesn't support the "government did it" therefore it will be ignored)

The burden of proof of the crazy "government did it" is up to the nuts to prove, which they haven't. The "you can't trust the government and they needed a reason to go to the war" arguement doesn't hold water without something to back it up.

"Hey, the terrorists have been trying to bring down the WTC for decades. Let's give them what they want!"

 

[ImpWizard]

LN (A she? Are you certain?) maintains that WTC7 was a controlled demolition.

I've seen her pics. (We used to write on the SRP together in a few threads, and we've exchanged many a PM), a few other people on this site have seen her pics too.

She's right, IMHO, WTC 7 was a controlled demolition. It was an implosive controlled demolition and one of the most perfect anyone has ever seen. Many experts agree.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif

LN maintains that the proof of this is in the line of explosions visible on footage of the collapse of the towers (either WTC1 or WTC2).

She's talking about the very easy to see long lines of explosions visible in slowmo on the videos of the collapse of the towers, not only on side, but from the other sides as well at the same time. The WTC 1 + 2 collapses were very easy to recognise explosive demolitions. The distinctive "cauliflower" appearance as debris is flung outwards (and also upwards) is common in explosive controlled demolitions.

Are you going to post some excuse about watermelons or straws now? Lots of you Arabsdidit types post excuses about watermelons and straws at this point. Seen it before in 9-11 debates on other sites.

 

[Fagin]

"Hey, the terrorists have been trying to bring down the WTC for decades. Let's give them what they want!"

Does this mean we all have to convert to Islam or kill ourselves?

 

[phrodeau]

I've seen her pics. (We used to write on the SRP together in a few threads, and we've exchanged many a PM), a few other people on this site have seen her pics too.

She's right, IMHO, WTC 7 was a controlled demolition. It was an implosive controlled demolition and one of the most perfect anyone has ever seen. Many experts agree.
http://www.whatreallyhappened.com/SMALL_wtc-7_1_.gif




She's talking about the very easy to see long lines of explosions visible in slowmo on the videos of the collapse of the towers, not only on side, but from the other sides as well at the same time. The WTC 1 + 2 collapses were very easy to recognise explosive demolitions. The distinctive "cauliflower" appearance as debris is flung outwards (and also upwards) is common in explosive controlled demolitions.

Are you going to post some excuse about watermelons or straws now? Lots of you Arabsdidit types post excuses about watermelons and straws at this point. Seen it before in 9-11 debates on other sites.

Sorry, you'll have to be clearer. What do cauliflowers on WTC1 and WTC2 have to do with the collapse of WTC7?

 

[ImpWizard]

The burden of proof of the crazy "government did it" is up to the nuts

upto the nuts (like you) to disprove.

You're a nut. you defend some bullshit story that requires impossible events, and the story comes from an untrustworthy source (The US govt) that is well known for lying.

 

[ImpWizard]

Sorry, you'll have to be clearer. What do cauliflowers on WTC1 and WTC2 have to do with the collapse of WTC7?

read it again.

 

[Fagin]

upto the nuts (like you) to disprove.

You're a nut. you defend some bullshit story that requires impossible events, and the story comes from an untrustworthy source (The US govt) that is well known for lying.

Quite contrary: The proof is up to the "Government did it" conspiracy nuts.

 

[ImpWizard]

Quite contrary: The proof is up to the "Government did it" conspiracy nuts.

I'm in firm disagreement with you there. The proof is up to the "Arabsdid it" conspiracy nuts because you fucking loonies have yet to prove anything other than your insanity.

Nobody in their right mind is going to believe anything from a lie factory, which is what the US govt under the Bush Administration is. They have no credibility.

You can't win the debates about 9-11 either because your claims require impossible events to have occurred.

 

[Fagin]

The "it didn't happen before" isn't proof. There was many firsts in history: the first flight yet they exists to this day. There was the first war yet they they exist today. There was the first jet engine yet they exist today. There was the first fridgerator yet they exist today. There was the first 100+ story building yet they exist today. There was the first radio yet they exist today. There was the first nuclear power plant yet they exist today.

 

[ImpWizard]

The "it didn't happen before" isn't proof. .

Yeah, yeah, but some things are still impossible. That's why your excuses are easily dismissed.

 

[Fagin]

Yeah, yeah, but some things are still impossible. That's why your excuses are easily dismissed.

A lot of reality were impossible and still exist today. The it was impossible and the what happened couldn't happen doesn't hold any legitimacy. Sorry to bust your bubble of denial.

 

[Gringao]

Yeah, yeah, but some things are still impossible. That's why your excuses are easily dismissed.

So who were all of those wives, husbands, operators, etc. talking to that morning?

 

[Pookie]

Pookie's IP address reveals her exact location, and anyone who knows her position in the intelligence community, or has any contact with real spies, knows this.

The only way you're going to redeem yourself now is to post her IP address.

My IP address is embedded in chips in my nipples. It was the only way I could get the Government health plan to pay for my nipple enlargements.

 

[Pookie]

The truth has been proved. "Magic Arab" version (warning #1: .pdf - warning #2: it doesn't support the "government did it" therefore it will be ignored)

The burden of proof of the crazy "government did it" is up to the nuts to prove, which they haven't. The "you can't trust the government and they needed a reason to go to the war" arguement doesn't hold water without something to back it up.

There's just too many things that totally don't make sense when you look at what it would take to cover up such an elaborate Government conspiracy. For example, these conspiracy nuts would have us believe that our Government was able to plant thousands of pounds of explosives and detonators at numerous points of every floor of those three buildings in freakin' NY City without the first person seeing it and blowing the whistle. One of those buildings had even been the target of an explosion a decade ago. The Government did all this to support going to war with Iraq. However, this same Government couldn't find a way to plant the first freakin' WMD in the miles and miles of desert with no one around to hide it from. They would have us believe all of this. The magic would be it not being Osama and his gang.

 

[Gringao]

There's just too many things that totally don't make sense when you look at what it would take to cover up such an elaborate Government conspiracy. For example, these conspiracy nuts would have us believe that our Government was able to plant thousands of pounds of explosives and detonators at numerous points of every floor of those three buildings in freakin' NY City without the first person seeing it and blowing the whistle. One of those buildings had even been the target of an explosion a decade ago. The Government did all this to support going to war with Iraq. However, this same Government couldn't find a way to plant the first freakin' WMD in the miles and miles of desert with no one around to hide it from. They would have us believe all of this. The magic would be it not being Osama and his gang.

You'd think that if they set the whole thing up so they could attack Iraq, they wouldn't have fingered Weird Beard from the outset, but pinned the attack on Saddam.

Nothing they say makes a lick of sense. I am, however, intrigued by electronic nipples. Tell us more.

 

[Pookie]

You'd think that if they set the whole thing up so they could attack Iraq, they wouldn't have fingered Weird Beard from the outset, but pinned the attack on Saddam.

Exactly. And why WTC 7? Of all the other buildings around, why that one to target for a controlled demolition? What was to be gained from it collapsing too? Why weren't other buildings closer to it wired for a demolition as well?

Nothing they say makes a lick of sense. I am, however, intrigued by electronic nipples. Tell us more.

I don't know if you have the proper clearance.

 

[Gringao]

Exactly. And why WTC 7? Of all the other buildings around, why that one to target for a controlled demolition? What was to be gained from it collapsing too? Why weren't other buildings closer to it wired for a demolition as well?

I must be missing something...isn't the contention that WTC1 and WTC2 were also wired with explosives, hence the [phony] claims of "near free-fall?"

I don't know if you have the proper clearance.

Shhh...fellow shill here, ID#G94S-13

 

[Pookie]

I must be missing something...isn't the contention that WTC1 and WTC2 were also wired with explosives, hence the [phony] claims of "near free-fall?"

Yeah, I meant those and WTC 7, but none of the other buildings closer to WTC 1 & 2.

Shhh...fellow shill here, ID#G94S-13

I'll send you my frequency.

 

[Pookie]

I'll send you my frequency.

Better yet, why don't you just ping my IP.

 

[Gringao]

Yeah, I meant those and WTC 7, but none of the other buildings closer to WTC 1 & 2.

Oh...duh...I see what you meant now. I'm sure there were copies of something implicating the PNAC board in a nefarious Zionist plot in WTC7.

What's missing from all of this is a motive that hasn't been hatched out of a fever swamp.

 

[Gringao]

Better yet, why don't you just ping my IP.

What kind of shill do you think I am?!