This just in from John Kerry:

Peregrinator said:
*yawn*

I don't have the energy to post a list of stupid, arguably illegal, constitutionally unsupportable, and manipulative things the Republicans have done, and I don't need to. You're well aware of them. You just like one side better, so you play the game that they actually are better. It's crap, and we all know it. There are no honorable politicians. Not one.


ASSHOLE

that is why I said

I would rather SHILL for a party that PRETENDS to support the US and its troops etc

Then a party that supports the terrorists etc

That is also why YOU have to vote PARTY!
 
busybody said:
ASSHOLE

that is why I said

I would rather SHILL for a party that PRETENDS to support the US and its troops etc

Then a party that supports the terrorists etc

That is also why YOU have to vote PARTY!


Voting party is ignorant. I'd rather have a good politician representing me than just vote for someone out of some party loyalty.
 
SleepingWarrior said:
Voting party is ignorant. I'd rather have a good politician representing me than just vote for someone out of some party loyalty.

I have given you at least TWO examples why you are incorrect

Lieberman and Pelosi/Harmen/Hastings

In theory, you are right, in reality, you are not!
 
Even if the statement was a "botched joke," what on earth would possess Kerry to think that this excuses what he said? George Allen and Trent Lott didn't get passes for "botched jokes"; indeed, here is what Kerry himself said about Lott, according to Salon . . . . "I simply do not believe the country can today afford to have someone who has made these statements again and again be the leader of the United States Senate."
 
busybody said:
I have given you at least TWO examples why you are incorrect

Lieberman and Pelosi/Harmen/Hastings

In theory, you are right, in reality, you are not!


Here is where you are incorrect... our duty is to vote for the individual that represents our best interest regardless of their political party. Not to vote for a lesser candidate because we think their opposing party is wrong.
 
busybody said:
ASSHOLE

that is why I said

I would rather SHILL for a party that PRETENDS to support the US and its troops etc

Then a party that supports the terrorists etc

That is also why YOU have to vote PARTY!

I generally do, actually. I vote party based on the issues that are most significant to me. I don't care what John Kerry says about "the troops." I don't believe that either party will be "weak on defense." There's not a nationally-viable pol out there who thinks defending the country is unnecessary.

So I vote according to the issues that might actually be affected by which party is in power; environment, abortion and similar religious-based horseshit like gay marriage, social security, education, etc.
 
SleepingWarrior said:
Just read what was said... he botched the joke as we all know but what was left of that was something to be construed as an insult to those in the military.

Actually, I read the comment before I saw the spin. My initial thought was he was trying to same something about how the poor and undereducated have a greater tendency to join the military than the wealthy and better educated, and that the poorest and least eductated end up as soldiers in combat units and would be more likely to end up in Iraq.

I still don't see an insult to anyone. But then I don't work for Karl Rove or Fox"News".
 
SleepingWarrior said:
Voting party is ignorant. I'd rather have a good politician representing me than just vote for someone out of some party loyalty.


A politician is only as good as his standing in the party

If he has no standing, by being his own man, he is useless

Look at Chaffe

and see what happened to Lieberman

SO your comment is IGNORANT!
 
busybody said:
A politician is only as good as his standing in the party

If he has no standing, by being his own man, he is useless

Look at Chaffe

and see what happened to Lieberman

SO your comment is IGNORANT!


Well hell lets just vote based on seniority since the longer you are there the more power you garner! Sheesh man, you vote for the person.
 
Peregrinator said:
I generally do, actually. I vote party based on the issues that are most significant to me. I don't care what John Kerry says about "the troops." I don't believe that either party will be "weak on defense." There's not a nationally-viable pol out there who thinks defending the country is unnecessary.

So I vote according to the issues that might actually be affected by which party is in power; environment, abortion and similar religious-based horseshit like gay marriage, social security, education, etc.


so in other wrods when you BERATED ME for NOT THINKING

you are in FACT doing the exact same thing I advocate

And I do believe the "POLICIES" of the DUMZ are ANTI US AND DESTRUCTIVE to our security

when you have the Minority leader say

"WE KILLED THE PAT ACT"

he shpuld not only not lead, he should be fucking SHOT!

and I could go on

But u r DUMB STEWPID and LAZY and wouldnt get it

I know, KERRY SAID SO!
 
SleepingWarrior said:
Well hell lets just vote based on seniority since the longer you are there the more power you garner! Sheesh man, you vote for the person.


How about MERIT

and NOT SENORITY

and once again

if you wanna change FACTS

that have been around for 200 years

DO IT!

dont expect results
 
Peregrinator said:
I generally do, actually. I vote party based on the issues that are most significant to me. I don't care what John Kerry says about "the troops." I don't believe that either party will be "weak on defense." There's not a nationally-viable pol out there who thinks defending the country is unnecessary.

So I vote according to the issues that might actually be affected by which party is in power; environment, abortion and similar religious-based horseshit like gay marriage, social security, education, etc.


the question is

what does DEFENDING the country mean?

THATS THE RUB!

The DUMZ have such a definition as to make us SURRENDER!
 
SleepingWarrior said:
Eh and I can and have argued that releasing peoples from the control of a murderous dictator is just that. Bush just fucked up in securing the peace.
There are hundreds of murderous dictators around the world. Is our responsibility to overthrow them all? And kill thousands of people we're "saving" in the process? And then what happens when they elect another murderous dictator?
 
Right-Wing Nut-Jobs



Rep. Harold Ford

"He needs to apologize to our troops"


Sen. Hillary Clinton

“What Sen. Kerry said was inappropriate”


Gov. Janet Napolitano

“It's just wrong"


U.S. Sen. Robert Menendez

“I think his comments were inappropriate”


New Jersey Senate President Richard Codey

“I think it's offensive”


Senate candidate Jon Tester

“Senator Kerry's remarks were poorly worded and just plain stupid”


North Carolina State Democratic Party chairman Jerry Meek

“John Kerry's botched joke was wrong and he should apologize”


Congressional candidate Bruce Braley

"I believe that Senator Kerry's brief statement was inappropriate”


Congressional candidate John Pavich

“I believe he should apologize to the brave men and women in service.”
 
Paendragon said:
AHAHAHAHA!

AHa . . . he!

*wipes away tear*

HAH . . . heh . . . aha . . .

Whooo boy!


hey PEE ON DRAGON

Your comment above looks STUPID now doesnt it?

As YOUR BOY who advocates voting the person

JUST ADMITS he doesnt

and votes the party

As you do, PEE ON DRAGON, voting for a CRIMINAL cause he is the right party

You are a fucking HIPPO CREEP!
 
busybody said:
so in other wrods when you BERATED ME for NOT THINKING

you are in FACT doing the exact same thing I advocate

And I do believe the "POLICIES" of the DUMZ are ANTI US AND DESTRUCTIVE to our security

when you have the Minority leader say

"WE KILLED THE PAT ACT"

he shpuld not only not lead, he should be fucking SHOT!

and I could go on

But u r DUMB STEWPID and LAZY and wouldnt get it

I know, KERRY SAID SO!

Well, maybe. But it was fun giving you shit for a while there.

Kerry just issued a statement apologizing. Wolf Blitzer just read it on the air. I haven't found a link yet.

"I want to make it clear....I sincerely regret that my words were misinterpreted...I personally apologize to any...."

Oh, it was James Carville I was referring to earlier when I couldn't remember his name.
 
Democrat Blog Applauds Kerry's Military Insult
Kerry’s base knew exactly what he was saying. They know very well that it was not a joke about President Bush, as Kerry is now (laughably) trying to claim. Here’s a post applauding Kerry’s slam at the military, at The Democratic Daily: All Star Rally Gives Phil Angelides A Boost.

Cortney Fielding staff writer for the San Gabriel Valley Tribune (and the Pasadena Star News) reports that “while the students showed proper enthusiasm for Angelides by waving his signs and wooing and booing at the right places, the energy in the room clearly belonged to Kerry.”

He took the stage to roaring applause and left it only to be mobbed by students and reporters.

Kerry charmed the crowd with tales of surfing at Mission Beach and got laughs for a series of one-liners, including telling the crowd he had just returned from Texas, “Where the president used to live - now he lives in a state of denial.”

Kerry then told the students that if they were able to navigate the education system, they could get comfortable jobs - “If you don’t, you get stuck in Iraq,” he said to a mixture of laughter and gasps.

Talk about speaking the stark truth to students who want more out of life. The education system in California is a mess, especially in L.A. County. Each day I pick my daughter up at school I see the recruiters leaving, smiling because they have snagged another kid who’s trapped by the system and sees no future other than enlisting. It shouldn’t be like this. A 50% drop out rate is unacceptable. What is the bottom line for these kids, a job at McDonald’s or Iraq. Kudos to Kerry for delivering a wake up call to the young voters at the rally (wingnuts are all wet on their claims).
 
busybody said:
the question is

what does DEFENDING the country mean?

THATS THE RUB!

The DUMZ have such a definition as to make us SURRENDER!

I disagree that anyone in national politics would do any such thing.
 
Peregrinator said:
Well, maybe. But it was fun giving you shit for a while there.

Kerry just issued a statement apologizing. Wolf Blitzer just read it on the air. I haven't found a link yet.

"I want to make it clear....I sincerely regret that my words were misinterpreted...I personally apologize to any...."

Oh, it was James Carville I was referring to earlier when I couldn't remember his name.


His apology is worthless

He has a HISTORY of SHITTING on the TROOPS
 
busybody said:
His apology is worthless

He has a HISTORY of SHITTING on the TROOPS
That was predictable, and horseshit as usual. You forget that he actually WAS "the troops."

You're doing it again...parroting repo talking points instead of thinking for yourself.

Who cares about Kerry anyway? Why are you so wound up about him? He's just yet another asshole politician, just like all of them.
 
Peregrinator said:
That was predictable, and horseshit as usual. You forget that he actually WAS "the troops."

You're doing it again...parroting repo talking points instead of thinking for yourself.

Who cares about Kerry anyway? Why are you so wound up about him? He's just yet another asshole politician, just like all of them.


he himself said HE KILLED UNLAWFULLY in Nam

he himself said HE WAS INVOLVED IN WAR CRIMES


In 04, he finally admitted THAT was UNTRUE as was his claim that THOUSANDS of US troops did the same

It's what Kerry should have said from the beginning, if he hadn't been trying to apply the wrong-headed "always attack your detractors venomously" lesson of 2004.
 
Peregrinator said:
Well, maybe. But it was fun giving you shit for a while there.

.


But your BULL SHIT was believed by at least one LIT LOSER

Pee On Dragon!

Apoligize to him :cool:
 
Back
Top