Think about your avatar

Damn Never, I am so sorry that this imbicile hijacked your thread like this. Is it safe for me to pass judgement yet? :rolleyes:
 
My av...

I decided to change my av after all that copyright stuff surfaced, I was using a very nice av of a woman but alas she was not me ... so I decided to use a real picture of myself.

I choose this av , because I like it and I think its nice. I know its not a " serious " or " sexy " av .. I simply like how the picture came out , it was never intended to be used as an av ... I took this picture for a certain someone.

I would post an av with my face and I have posted them before but for some reason I don't like that idea that some one might recognize me , the issue of privacy pops up when I think of posting a picture of my face.

That is all ... thank you. :)
 
I know it’s much easier to attack words I haven’t said and positions I haven’t taken, but I’m certain you’ll understand why I might have a problem with it.

Third time is the charm:
Might I ask what, exactly, you disagreed with in my original post?
 
Naughty n Nice said:
Damn Never, I am so sorry that this imbicile hijacked your thread like this. Is it safe for me to pass judgement yet? :rolleyes:

Is it not a free country??? r have you forgotten Amendment 2?? You know, you were so busy being mean to me, you missed a great compliment I paid you. How sad. Are you illiterate maybe??
 
Never said:
I know it’s much easier to attack words I haven’t said and positions I haven’t taken, but I’m certain you’ll understand why I might have a problem with it.

Third time is the charm:
Might I ask what, exactly, you disagreed with in my original post?

I refer you to the answers I gave some moments ago and pray God that you can recall the raisson d etre of the thread you started!!!
 
Re: My av...

Aphrodisiac said:
I decided to change my av after all that copyright stuff surfaced, I was using a very nice av of a woman but alas she was not me ... so I decided to use a real picture of myself.

I choose this av , because I like it and I think its nice. I know its not a " serious " or " sexy " av .. I simply like how the picture came out , it was never intended to be used as an av ... I took this picture for a certain someone.

I would post an av with my face and I have posted them before but for some reason I don't like that idea that some one might recognize me , the issue of privacy pops up when I think of posting a picture of my face.

That is all ... thank you. :)

I think your AV should be copyrighted :p
 
We all, I think, have prejudices about AV's. I know I do.

For example, guys who post AV's of cocks, or muscular chests, or have anything pulsing always turn me off.

That's not to say I can't get over it... I always read what people write, and that's more important in the long run.

Real faces always impress me.

And naturally, I have same reaction as takingchances to women's body parts... Soblue... oh man... And of course sexygirl... and bratcat. I admit, I have a hard time imagining having an argument about anything with Soblue. I'd be lusting after her the whole time.

The fact that brokenbrainwave uses Opus instantly made me his friend.

But like I said, the words are more important than the image.

And I'm much worse about spelling and grammar, I think, than AV's.
 
Naughty n Nice said:
Damn Never, I am so sorry that this imbicile hijacked your thread like this. Is it safe for me to pass judgement yet? :rolleyes:

Since I am still talking avs..How has the group been hijacked precisely?? I am on topic.
 
For starters, not everyone is in this country.
Secondly, if you want a thread to spew your crap, start one, don't hijack someone else's.
Perhaps it would be best if we stopped feeding this troll!
 
My AV

My Av is a picture of myself. I took this picture after fingering myself to an orgasm while chatting with an e-pal! I love the way I taste and I love to suck my juices off my fingers after I'm done.

I decided to make it my AV because I love sex and the way it tastes and smells, be it with myself - or another person. Yummers! :kiss:
 
Naughty n Nice:
“Damn Never, I am so sorry that this imbecile hijacked your thread like this. Is it safe for me to pass judgment yet? :rolleyes:


I would neither taste the fruit of another’s garden nor bear the onus of their weeds.
 
<checking watch>

Isn't it about time for you to quote Kierkegaard, oh Lord?



Never: your first post clearly stated that you judge people solely on the basis of their avatars, and that if someone has an avatar to which you object, you would completely and permanently disregard their words, thoughts and deeds. Don't you remember? I think there was something in there about poisoning squirrels, too, but I'm a little hazy on that part.
 
Sandia said:
We all, I think, have prejudices about AV's. I know I do.

For example, guys who post AV's of cocks, or muscular chests, or have anything pulsing always turn me off.

That's not to say I can't get over it... I always read what people write, and that's more important in the long run.

Real faces always impress me.

And naturally, I have same reaction as takingchances to women's body parts... Soblue... oh man... And of course sexygirl... and bratcat. I admit, I have a hard time imagining having an argument about anything with Soblue. I'd be lusting after her the whole time.

The fact that brokenbrainwave uses Opus instantly made me his friend.

But like I said, the words are more important than the image.

And I'm much worse about spelling and grammar, I think, than AV's.

You are then ONE dimensional... If you judge by avs. How sad. Read the pics, draw conclusions, then (maybe) the words and deeds....But just maybe. We don't want you to over exert yourself
 
LordLucan74:
"I refer you to the answers I gave some moments ago and pray God that you can recall the raisson d etre of the thread you started!!!"


Four is a strong number in the kabala tradition:
Might I ask what, exactly, you disagreed with in my original post?
 
tortoise said:
<checking watch>

Isn't it about time for you to quote Kierkegaard, oh Lord?



Never: your first post clearly stated that you judge people solely on the basis of their avatars, and that if someone has an avatar to which you object, you would completely and permanently disregard their words, thoughts and deeds. Don't you remember? I think there was something in there about poisoning squirrels, too, but I'm a little hazy on that part.

True! My point re-stated. This is indeed what you (NEVER) said...
 
LordLucan74 said:


I refer you to the answers I gave some moments ago and pray God that you can recall the raisson d etre of the thread you started!!!

Broad hint: is it within the realm of possibility that your perception of her raison d'etre does not jibe 100% with the actuality? I realize that this is a frightening thought, as it would imply that your entire prologed rant on this thread might, just might, possibly be based on false premises...?
 
Tortoise:
“<checking watch>

Isn't it about time for you to quote Kierkegaard, oh Lord?



Never: your first post clearly stated that you judge people solely on the basis of their avatars, and that if someone has an avatar to which you object, you would completely and permanently disregard their words, thoughts and deeds. Don't you remember? I think there was something in there about poisoning squirrels, too, but I'm a little hazy on that part.”


Blessed be the flow of the many breasts of Artemis which washes away this folly, for the scales have fallen from mine eyes. Bless this man's brow and the genius that resides in it; sweet guidance from the maze of my ignorance, brilliant lantern on the path of truth.
 
Never said:
LordLucan74:
"I refer you to the answers I gave some moments ago and pray God that you can recall the raisson d etre of the thread you started!!!"


Four is a strong number in the kabala tradition:
Might I ask what, exactly, you disagreed with in my original post?

I have stated it many times. Someone else just did. Maybe you do not have the mental capacity to grasp it. I can not say it with any more clarity. Maybe you should cease asking, re-read, and (God Forbid) THINK.....Maybe then the light of wisdom will shine on you.
 
I chose Calvin because I think he expresses my personality and outlook perfectly. And I think Watterson is a genius.

Sometimes I worry that people take me a little less seriously - BUT - on the whole - I think that's a good thing.

Oh, yeah, and I wanted to say I like glamorilla's AV's. He's just about the only openly gay guy on lit, and I respect that.

(And I've often wondered why that is.)
 
Lord Lucan:
” I have stated it many times. Someone else just did. Maybe you do not have the mental capacity to grasp it. I can not say it with any more clarity. Maybe you should cease asking, re-read, and (God Forbid) THINK.....Maybe then the light of wisdom will shine on you.”

The number five represents the four elements and the ‘either’ in the pagan tradition, and the four elements and the ‘void’ in Shinto:
Might I ask what, exactly, you disagreed with in my original post?
 
Never said:
Tortoise:
“<checking watch>

Isn't it about time for you to quote Kierkegaard, oh Lord?



Never: your first post clearly stated that you judge people solely on the basis of their avatars, and that if someone has an avatar to which you object, you would completely and permanently disregard their words, thoughts and deeds. Don't you remember? I think there was something in there about poisoning squirrels, too, but I'm a little hazy on that part.”


Blessed be the flow of the many breasts of Artemis which washes away this folly, for the scales have fallen from mine eyes. Bless this man's brow and the genius that resides in it; sweet guidance from the maze of my ignorance, brilliant lantern on the path of truth.

NEVER------> Rehab NOW!!! You must be on crack!!! No way you were so sumarrily dismisive!!
 
LordLucan74 said:


True! My point re-stated. This is indeed what you (NEVER) said...

Reading comprehension in exact inverse proportion to arrogance.

Fascinating.
 
Sandia said:
I chose Calvin because I think he expresses my personality and outlook perfectly. And I think Watterson is a genius.

Sometimes I worry that people take me a little less seriously - BUT - on the whole - I think that's a good thing.

Oh, yeah, and I wanted to say I like glamorilla's AV's. He's just about the only openly gay guy on lit, and I respect that.

(And I've often wondered why that is.)

Do you make snowmen like he does?
 
Back
Top