Things we didn't know

[PervOtaku]

No, such studies give no hard answers. Yes, they're easily sensationalized

Any science that is based on a study rather than a controlled, reproducible experiment, is subjective at best. The specific conditions of the study need to be fully taken into account when analyzing the results. The major fault is when reporters condense the thing into a headline and phrase it in a way that leads people to believe the trend that was found is now a universally proven thing. Most people are used to scientist who use controlled, reproducible experiments being always right about things, and do not understand the distinction of scientists that operate with studies.

2. Let's assume that there are readers out there who would like a story about aliens with giant tentacles fucking our women.

Yes, I make that assumption all the time!

 

[oggbashan]

...

BTW, the process of modeling the real world with simplifying assumptions is something we all do.
...
2. Let's assume that there are readers out there who would like a story about aliens with giant tentacles fucking our women.
...

rj

There are dozens of stories on Literotica that have tentacles fucking our women. I've even written one myself even if it was satire.

 

[Hypoxia]

Really? That truism would be surprising to the Botany & Plant Science department at my local university.

I should have appended a smiley after that 'truism'. It was not meant to be taken too seriously.

Any science that is based on a study rather than a controlled, reproducible experiment, is subjective at best.

Like astronomy?