sr71plt
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Jul 18, 2006
- Posts
- 51,872
*sigh* Much of what I read here is the projection of what individual writers say they came to Lit. for as what the purposes of the Web site are--and that's how we start down the path of yammering over critiques left on stories in public comments. The Web site does not portray itself as a site to post stories for criticism. It's for posting stories to be shared and enjoyed by readers of like interests with writers.
If you seek critical comments on your stories to help you become a better writer, that's wonderful--but you can come to the forum and ask for that help.
When you take it upon yourself to critique a story directly where the story is posted--and especially if you do so uninvited--you are taking liberties that quite likely--and quite reasonably--might not be welcomed. And you have made the transaction about you (and how savyy you perceive yourself to be), not about the story or the writer of the story. This is no less true in sending an unsolicited out-of-the-blue e-mail or PM to the author of the story.
Writers of stories here are justified in submitting stories that do more than turn themselves on--and seek readers expecting no more than that either--because the Web site doesn't go beyond this in defining the purpose of the story file. And if they react badly to unsolicited writing "help," they are justified in this too.
All of this "better writing" and "development as a writer" stuff is a projection of other users of the Web site. It's not there in the stated purpose of the Web site story file.
If you seek critical comments on your stories to help you become a better writer, that's wonderful--but you can come to the forum and ask for that help.
When you take it upon yourself to critique a story directly where the story is posted--and especially if you do so uninvited--you are taking liberties that quite likely--and quite reasonably--might not be welcomed. And you have made the transaction about you (and how savyy you perceive yourself to be), not about the story or the writer of the story. This is no less true in sending an unsolicited out-of-the-blue e-mail or PM to the author of the story.
Writers of stories here are justified in submitting stories that do more than turn themselves on--and seek readers expecting no more than that either--because the Web site doesn't go beyond this in defining the purpose of the story file. And if they react badly to unsolicited writing "help," they are justified in this too.
All of this "better writing" and "development as a writer" stuff is a projection of other users of the Web site. It's not there in the stated purpose of the Web site story file.
