The Voyeurism Hotel

[3113]

Found the perfect hotel for the next Lit-Together. A little pricy, but clearly worth it

Two couples, both from out of town, linger on the same park bench, gazing up at gauzy curtains in the windows of a 19-story hotel. They don't know each other, but there they are, on a sunny Labor Day afternoon, hoping to steal a glimpse of, well, for lack of a more delicate way to put it, naked people.

Voyeurism became New York's hot attraction this summer after guests were photographed in the buff prancing about, even having sex, in front of floor-to-ceiling windows at the Standard Hotel in the hip Meatpacking District. These shenanigans unfolded as a result of a series of unintended circumstances. Start with the opening of the High Line Park, built on abandoned railroad tracks three stories above the street. Add a swank hotel, hoisted by massive pylons that straddle the High Line. Then bring on the combustible element: New Yorkers and tourists, who flocked to see the city's newest additions. As they walked the High Line, they quickly realized there was more to see than they could have dared to hope. With that, the High Line became a stage set as well as a destination.

All summer, images of the Standard's bawdy guests spread like cyber wildfire, and the management seemed to relish the attention, even encouraging new arrivals in the lobby to go ahead and "just have fun!" The hotel's blog, ever briefly, linked to photos of two unclothed women in provocative positions. Now, the curious assemble regularly....

Full story here.

Talk about a ready-made plot bunny! This one's practically gift-wrapped.

 

[voluptuary_manque]

"It's too expensive for us to stay there," says Beverly, quoting rates as high as $705.

Yup.

 

[Boxlicker101]

"It's too expensive for us to stay there," says Beverly, quoting rates as high as $705.

Yup.

That doesn't make any sense. For an attractive and sexy couple, they should be willing to pay them.

 

[TE999]

Found the perfect hotel for the next Lit-Together. A little pricy, but clearly worth it

Full story here.

Talk about a ready-made plot bunny! This one's practically gift-wrapped.

Drat! I've already posted a story titled 'From A Window'.

Maybe a sequel 'From Another Window'? No? Too obvious, huh? Lemme get back to you...

 

[voluptuary_manque]

That doesn't make any sense. For an attractive and sexy couple, they should be willing to pay them.

I certainly wouldn't say that the Litogethers don't have some attractive and sexy couples but for the rest of us, it's too expensive!

 

[3113]

Maybe a sequel 'From Another Window'? No? Too obvious, huh? Lemme get back to you...

"From Many Windows"? This is a hotel.

 

[bronzeage]

Found the perfect hotel for the next Lit-Together. A little pricy, but clearly worth it

Full story here.

Talk about a ready-made plot bunny! This one's practically gift-wrapped.

There is an office building in downtown New Orleans with an exclusive club on the top floor. The wall next to the men's room urinal is a ten foot wide plate glass window over looking the the city. A person with a good telescope could get a view of some of the city's highest paid penises.

 

[Fantasies_only]

Found the perfect hotel for the next Lit-Together. A little pricy, but clearly worth it

Full story here.

Talk about a ready-made plot bunny! This one's practically gift-wrapped.

Wait, you mean it happened again?
In 1994 Webcams (a "new technology") were set up in an office building in the suite of a hotel.
Although it was meant as a cityscape and skyline camera, the night shift workers quickly realized there was big money to be made in the porn industry (copied www.jennicam.com), and www.voyeurhotel.com was born.
In 1996, they started the first escort service which quickly became a brothel with VIP tickets and then started getting in the press, regarded as a joke.
A year later however, the media was heating up with numerous complaints from wives on the brink of divorce, families completely destroyed, and outraged women's groups who made the point of it degrading women as well as invading privacy.

In March of 1998, the site was taken down and the building bought by more decent folks.
Businesses went back to normal and Ed Koch's biggest worry was how he would act in Batman.

 

[voluptuary_manque]

Really? Well, I guess that's no surprise. And if this version is eventually closed down it will inevitably happen again in a slightly different guise. After all, given the number of advances in technology that actually happen first in the porn industry, there is simply no stopping it for long.

 

[Fantasies_only]

Really? Well, I guess that's no surprise. And if this version is eventually closed down it will inevitably happen again in a slightly different guise. After all, given the number of advances in technology that actually happen first in the porn industry, there is simply no stopping it for long.

That's certainly true in Europe (nudist hotels).
It would be the perfect example of the misuse of security cameras (including of the X-ray variety).

 

[Vermilion]

Found the perfect hotel for the next Lit-Together. A little pricy, but clearly worth it

Full story here.

Talk about a ready-made plot bunny! This one's practically gift-wrapped.

Too easy - the work's already done

x
V

 

[Trinique_Fire]

Oh my. I'm going to NYC this spring. I do believe my binoculars and I will be visiting.

 

[Fantasies_only]

Oh my. I'm going to NYC this spring. I do believe my binoculars and I will be visiting.

Hey guys, did you ever consider there are some people there you don't want to see naked, particularly an over 50 retirement community?
What about very little children, wouldn't you avert your eyes then?

 

[cloudy]

Hey guys, did you ever consider there are some people there you don't want to see naked, particularly an over 50 retirement community?
What about very little children, wouldn't you avert your eyes then?

You wouldn't, though, would you, Mr. Underage Pervert.

 

[Fantasies_only]

You wouldn't, though, would you, Mr. Underage Pervert.

I wouldn't bother to make the trip you peeping tom!
There are video voyerism laws in most states and peeping Tom laws in all big cities.
I wouldn't want to break them, so who's the pervert now?

 

[cloudy]

I wouldn't bother to make the trip you peeping tom!
There are video voyerism laws in most states and peeping Tom laws in all big cities.
I wouldn't want to break them, so who's the pervert now?

1) I'm female, dipshit.

2) I'm not the one that's threatened, over and over, to sue Literotica for not letting me post underage sex stories. That would be you, and no... people haven't forgotten.

 

[Fantasies_only]

1) I'm female, dipshit.

2) I'm not the one that's threatened, over and over, to sue Literotica for not letting me post underage sex stories. That would be you, and no... people haven't forgotten.

Shit, I never said a thing!
First of all, being female has nothing to do with it.
True there are more female voyeur victems than male, but it can go both ways.

As for my posts here, if you look back over the wording I didn't say I would sue Literotica.
I said if a suit came up against me their name would be mentioned.
I wish you didn't bring this up again.
Through a series of PMs from Manu, I have decided to retract that statement.
Also according to the rules of just about every site, in the case of a legal complaint, my ISP can be contacted and my IP revealed to all.
I do not want this happening, so why would I rock the boat?

 

[Freefall_mc]

Hey guys, did you ever consider there are some people there you don't want to see naked, particularly an over 50 retirement community?
What about very little children, wouldn't you avert your eyes then?

And you are thinking some depraved parents would take underages there? ok
We sure don't know the same people, tg. And as for the over 50, goooo for it I say. A good cover for me while I practice mingling over by the wet bar!

 

[Fantasies_only]

And you are thinking some depraved parents would take underages there? ok
We sure don't know the same people, tg. And as for the over 50, goooo for it I say. A good cover for me while I practice mingling over by the wet bar!

Have you ever been to nudist/naturist Websites?
They will take in children 8 and under, with the theory of it being such a natural state, the child doesn't think of nudity as sexual (y8 changes into thoughts of sexuality as wet dreams emerge).
To be clear about child pornography in the case of nudity, a naked or partially nude child is not child pornography depending on the context of the picture, but just to be safe about misinterpritation, the old rule is still used ("All models and images were 18 at the time the image was made.")

 

[Boxlicker101]

Have you ever been to nudist/naturist Websites?
They will take in children 8 and under, with the theory of it being such a natural state, the child doesn't think of nudity as sexual (y8 changes into thoughts of sexuality as wet dreams emerge).
To be clear about child pornography in the case of nudity, a naked or partially nude child is not child pornography depending on the context of the picture, but just to be safe about misinterpritation, the old rule is still used ("All models and images were 18 at the time the image was made.")

I have seen a few TV commercials featuring very young, completely nude children crawling around on the floor or being given a bath, or similar innocent event. I think it's cute and enjoyable, and not the least erotic. Somehow, I can't see anybody getting turned on by such a sight, but there are weirdos in the world.

 

[Boxlicker101]

Hey guys, did you ever consider there are some people there you don't want to see naked, particularly an over 50 retirement community?
What about very little children, wouldn't you avert your eyes then?

There are some very hot people in their Fifties. Not myself, but I have seen models in "Playboy" who were in their Fifties, and they were HOT!!

 

[voluptuary_manque]

There are some very hot people in their Fifties. Not myself, but I have seen models in "Playboy" who were in their Fifties, and they were HOT!!

Oh mercy, are they! Ah, to be such a mere sprout again . . .