Like the Brits have any values anyway!I deny the existence of 'traditional' values because all values are mutable
Well, I meant traditions, but...either way:

Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Like the Brits have any values anyway!I deny the existence of 'traditional' values because all values are mutable

Like the Brits have any values anyway!
Well, I meant traditions, but...either way:![]()
The weddings-as-big-business trend is really gross. I have a friend who is a wedding and event planner and I think it's gross, even though I like her.
However, i sometimes get wistful when I see pictures of my friends in beautiful white gowns, glowing, with their friends and family. And my picture is a crooked (my friend was a horrible photographer) blurry photo of my husband and I grinning under the christmas tree at the courthouse we were married at. Which is a sweet memory, but no gushing-love-blossoms-puppies-kitties-stuff. :-(
I deny the existence of 'traditional' values because all values are mutable
Official notice:
Don't traditions evolve anyway?
Horn? Human horn? Isn't that the nose?whtever. i'm just in need of horn
If anybody attacks you for that, they'll have to get through me. That's awesome.L and I got married by a JP. L wore a tropical shirt and shorts, I wore a flower printed dress...yes, I wore a dress. We were at a lake in the boonies. We let our friends take photos - no professional photog. Actually, we let our friends do pretty much everything, they even wrote our vows for us (we sprang that on them three hours before the ceremony, tee hee) - it was kind of a free for all. Completely nontraditional in every way, but oh so FUN!
Fuck the gushing love blossoms, it's the memories and the individuals that make it special.
*backs away, hides limbs*
I have not heard this term "grokking" before. How do you define it?
Is being vague one of them?I have a lot of values that could be traditional.
I deny the existence of 'traditional' values because all values are mutable
I didn't write this. Just humoring the crowd here is all.
Traditional Values are based upon biblical foundations and upon the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, the writings of the Founding Fathers, and upon the writings of great political and religious thinkers throughout the ages.
"Traditional values" is code. That's it.
I agree about the biblical part - when people talk about traditional values, that's usually at the heart of it, but the documents you mention were pretty fucking radical. Still are. I mean what's traditional about revolution?
I didn't write this. Just humoring the crowd here is all.
Traditional Values are based upon biblical foundations and upon the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, the writings of the Founding Fathers, and upon the writings of great political and religious thinkers throughout the ages.
President George Washington, in his Farewell Address in 1796, said that popular government cannot exist without morality—and morality based upon biblical principles. In effect, he defined traditional values in these words:
Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports….And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. – Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure—reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
In short, Bible-based traditional values are what created and what have preserved our nation. We will lose our freedoms if we reject these values.
That's because pictures or it didn't happen.35 percent of adult women worked in the 50's.
Americans substitute 50's TV for actual history.
History doesn't really teach the little people...and the eccentrics, are just eccentric. You have to teach yourself about them, I've found....That's because pictures or it didn't happen.
And those were all low-class women anyway. or Bohemians and rebels.

Is being vague one of them?![]()
That's because pictures or it didn't happen.
And those were all low-class women anyway. or Bohemians and rebels.
That's because pictures or it didn't happen.
And those were all low-class women anyway. or Bohemians and rebels.
Humoring, huh.I didn't write this. Just humoring the crowd here is all.
Traditional Values are based upon biblical foundations and upon the principles outlined in the Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, the writings of the Founding Fathers, and upon the writings of great political and religious thinkers throughout the ages.
President George Washington, in his Farewell Address in 1796, said that popular government cannot exist without morality—and morality based upon biblical principles. In effect, he defined traditional values in these words:
Of all the dispositions and habits, which lead to political prosperity, Religion and morality are indispensable supports….And let us with caution indulge the supposition, that morality can be maintained without religion. – Whatever may be conceded to the influence of refined education on minds of peculiar structure—reason and experience both forbid us to expect, that national morality can prevail in exclusion of religious principle.
In short, Bible-based traditional values are what created and what have preserved our nation. We will lose our freedoms if we reject these values.
If that's the gay agenda, I'll sign their petitions!!The TVC also makes assertions on its website about disproportionate homosexual pedophilia and attacks the idea that people are born gay and the claim that gays want the right to marry for the same reasons that heterosexuals do — the TVC suggests the real purpose of marriage equality is to destroy the concept of marriage and ultimately replace it altogether with group sex and polygamy.

Well for one thing I expect men to be fully accountable for whatever it is they do. Women however I allow much more freedom.
Why? Because I believe the whole point to a man is to be self sufficient, except those cute little feminine boys, they count as girls in my mind.
Women however can be dependent for all I care, and so things may not entirely be on her.
However I will say that my view towards women is more flexible than with men. If a woman dresses and acts girly, I give her every excuse in the world. However if a woman is professional, in charge, she better be on the ball.
I do typically generalize this across everyone. It's one of my schemas, how I make sense of the world.
I think think it's a good one too, and is probably fairly traditional.