The Rich are waging a class war on the working class

Le Jacquelope

Loves Spam
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
76,445
http://www.alternet.org/economy/145...s_it_going_to_take_to_get_it_back?page=entire

The Richest 1% Have Captured America's Wealth -- What's It Going to Take to Get It Back?

By David DeGraw
February 17, 2010

The U.S. already had the highest inequality of wealth in the industrialized world prior to the financial crisis -- and it's gotten even worse.


This is Part II of David DeGraw's report, "The Economic Elite vs. People of the USA." Click here for Part I.

"The war against working people should be understood to be a real war.... Specifically in the U.S., which happens to have a highly class-conscious business class.... And they have long seen themselves as fighting a bitter class war, except they don't want anybody else to know about it." -- Noam Chomsky



As a record amount of U.S. citizens are struggling to get by, many of the largest corporations are experiencing record-breaking profits, and CEOs are receiving record-breaking bonuses. How could this be happening, how did we get to this point?

The Economic Elite have escalated their attack on U.S. workers over the past few years; however, this attack began to build intensity in the 1970s. In 1970, CEOs made $25 for every $1 the average worker made. Due to technological advancements, production and profit levels exploded from 1970 - 2000. With the lion's share of increased profits going to the CEO's, this pay ratio dramatically rose to $90 for CEOs to $1 for the average worker.

As ridiculous as that seems, an in-depth study in 2004 on the explosion of CEO pay revealed that, including stock options and other benefits, CEO pay is more accurately $500 to $1.

Paul Buchheit, from DePaul University, revealed, "From 1980 to 2006 the richest 1% of America tripled their after-tax percentage of our nation's total income, while the bottom 90% have seen their share drop over 20%." Robert Freeman added, "Between 2002 and 2006, it was even worse: an astounding three-quarters of all the economy's growth was captured by the top 1%."

Due to this, the United States already had the highest inequality of wealth in the industrialized world prior to the financial crisis. Since the crisis, which has hit the average worker much harder than CEOs, the gap between the top one percent and the remaining 99% of the US population has grown to a record high. The economic top one percent of the population now owns over 70% of all financial assets, an all time record.

As mentioned before, just look at the first full year of the crisis when workers lost an average of 25 percent off their 401k. During the same time period, the wealth of the 400 richest Americans increased by $30 billion, bringing their total combined wealth to $1.57 trillion, which is more than the combined net worth of 50% of the US population. Just to make this point clear, 400 people have more wealth than 155 million people combined.

Meanwhile, 2009 was a record-breaking year for Wall Street bonuses, as firms issued $150 billion to their executives. 100% of these bonuses are a direct result of our tax dollars, so if we used this money to create jobs, instead of giving them to a handful of top executives, we could have paid an annual salary of $30,000 to 5 million people.

So while US workers are now working more hours and have become dramatically more productive and profitable, our pay is actually declining and all the dramatic increases in wealth are going straight into the pockets of the Economic Elite.

If our income had kept pace with compensation distribution rates established in the early 1970s, we would all be making at least three times as much as we are currently making. How different would your life be if you were making $120,000 a year, instead of $40,000?

So it should come as no surprise to see that we now have the highest inequality of wealth in the industrialized world and the highest inequality of wealth in our nation's history. The backbone of America, a hard working middle class that has made our country a world leader, has been devastated.

Now that we have a better understanding of how our income has been suppressed over the past forty years, let's take a look at how the economy has been designed to take the limited money we receive and put it into the hands of the Economic Elite as well.

Costs of Living

Other than in the workplace, in almost all our costs of living the system is now blatantly rigged against us. Let's take a look at it, starting out with our tax system.

In total, the average US citizen is forced to give up approximately 30% of our income in taxes. This tax system is now strategically designed to flow straight into the hands of the Economic Elite. A huge percentage of our tax dollars ultimately end up in their pockets. The past decade proves that -- whether it's the Republicans or the Democrats running the government -- our tax money is not going into our community, it is going into the pockets of the billionaires who have bought off both parties - it is obscene.

For an example of how this system flows to the Economic Elite, just look at the Wall Street "bailout." The real size of the bailout is estimated to be $14 trillion - and could end up costing trillions more than that. By now you are probably also sick of hearing about the bailout, but stop and think about this for a momentÖ Do you comprehend how much $14 trillion is?

What could be accomplished with this money is almost beyond common comprehension.

And this is just the tip of the iceberg that has hit us. On top of the trillions given to the Wall Street elite, we already have a record $12.3 trillion in national debt - and we now have to pay $500 billion in interest to the Economic Elite on this debt every year, yet another way they are milking us dry. When you add in unfunded liabilities owed, like social security payments, we actually owe a stunning $74 trillion. That adds up to a debt of $242,000 for every man, woman and child in America.

Trillions more, 25% of taxpayer dollars allocated to military spending goes unaccounted for every year, not to mention the billions spent on overcharging and outright fraud. During the War on Terror, the Economic Elite have used our tax money to build a private army that has more soldiers deployed than the US military - a congressional study revealed that 69% of the "US" fighting forces deployed throughout the world in our name are in fact private mercenaries, 80% of them are foreign nationals. Private contractors regularly get paid three to five times more than our soldiers, and have been repeatedly caught overcharging and committing fraud on a massive scale. A congressional investigation revealed this and strongly recommended that we seize wasting tax dollars on these private military contractors. However, under Obama, there has actually been a drastic increase in total tax dollars spent on them.

In 2009, just over $1 trillion tax dollars were spent on the military, it's safe to say that at least $350 billion of that was needlessly wasted.

When you research our tax system you see an unprecedented level of waste and fraud rampant throughout most expenditures. Our tax system is a national disaster of epic proportions. It is literally an organized criminal operation that continues to rob us in broad daylight, with zero accountability.

Politicians and mainstream "news" outlets will not tell you this, but most every serious economist knows that due to so much theft and debt created in the tax system, the only way to fix things, other than stopping the theft and seizing the trillions that have been stolen, will be for the government to cut important social funding and drastically raise our taxes. Other than the record national debt, many states are running record deficits and ìbarreling toward economic disaster, raising the likelihood of higher taxes, more government layoffs and deep cuts in services.î Our nation's biggest state economies, like California and New York, are the ones in most trouble.

To merely say that things will not be improving economically is to be a delusional optimist. The truth that you will not hear: we have been hit by an economic deathblow and the United States lay in ruins.

It's not just this criminal tax system; the theft is now built into all our costs of living.

Trillions more in our spending on food and fuel has been stolen due to fraudulent stock transactions and overcharging. Just ten years ago, in 2000, American families paid 7% of our income on food and fuel. We now pay 20%. This drastic increase is primarily driven by fraudulent market manipulation that drives up stock prices. Congress uncovered this in 2006, as part of the Enron investigation they found that companies manipulated the oil market to create major spikes in stock values, and then they didn't do anything about it - nothing to see here, just move on.

As mentioned before, we have the most expensive health care system in the world and we are forced to pay twice as much as other countries, and the overall care we get in return ranks 37th in the world. On average, US citizens are now paying a record high 8% of their income on medical care.

Part of the reason why foreclosure rates are so high is because the percentage of income Americans pay on their housing has risen to 34%.

So for these basic necessities - taxes, food, fuel, shelter and medical bills - we have already lost 92% of our limited income. Then factor in ever-increasing interest rates on credit cards, student loans, rising prices for cable, internet, phone, bank fees, etc., etc., etcÖ. We are being robbed and gouged in all costs of living, in every aspect of our life. No wonder bankruptcies are skyrocketing and the amount of people suffering from psychological depression has reached an epidemic level.

The American worker is screwed over every step of the way, and it all starts with the explosion in the cost of a college education. This is one of the Economic Elite's most devastating weapons. To have any chance of succeeding in this economy, it is commonly believed that you must attend the best college possible. With the rising costs involved, today's students are graduating with record levels of debt from student loans. At the same time, the unemployment rate among recent college graduates has risen higher than the national average, and those that do find work are making significantly less than they expected to make. This combination of extreme debt and reduced pay has crippled an entire generation right from the start and has put them in a vicious cycle of spiraling debt that they will struggle with for the rest of their lives. The most recent college graduates are now known as a "lost generation."

The American dream has turned into a nightmare. The economic system is a sophisticated prison cell; the indentured servant is now an indebted wage slave; whips and chains have evolved into debts.

"There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is by sword. The other is by debt." -- John Adams

Concealing National Wealth

"Liberty in the concrete signifies release from the impact of particular oppressive forces; emancipation from something once taken as a normal part of human life but now experienced as bondage... Today, it signifies liberation from material insecurity and from the coercions and repressions that prevent multitudes from participation in the vast cultural resources that are at hand."-- John Dewey

When you take the time to research and analyze the wealth that has gone to the economic top one percent, you begin to realize just how much we have been robbed. Trillions upon trillions of dollars that could make the lives of all hard working Americans much easier have been strategically funneled into the coffers of the Economic Elite. The denial of wealth is the key to the Economic Elite's power. An entire generation of massive wealth creation has been strategically withheld from 99% of the US population.

The US public doesn't have any understanding of how much wealth has been generated and concentrated into the hands of the Economic Elite over the past 40 years; there is no historical frame of reference. This withholding of wealth is truly the greatest crime against humanity in the history of civilization.

What could be done with all the money that has been hoarded by the Economic Elite is extraordinary!

Let's consider what we could do with the money that has been stolen from us? On top of what should be our average six-figure yearly income, we could have:

* Free health care for every American,
* A free 4 bedroom home for every American family,
* 5% tax rate for 99% of Americans,
* Drastically improved public education and free college for all,
* Significantly improved public transportation and infrastructure,

The list goes on...

This is not some far-fetched fantasy. These are all things that Franklin D. Roosevelt talked about doing in the 1940's, long before the explosion of wealth creation in our technologically advanced global economy. The money for all this is already there, stashed into the claws of the Economic Elite. The denial of wealth to the masses is the key to the Economic Elite's power. Outside of outdated and obsolete economic models and theories -- and incredibly short-sighted greed -- there is no reason why all this money should be kept in the hands of a few, at the immense suffering and expense of the many.

If Americans could just understand how much wealth is being withheld from us, we would have a massive uprising and the Economic Elite would be swept away, into the history books alongside the evil despots of the past.

This is Part II of David DeGraw's report, "The Economic Elite vs. People of the USA."
 
lol....our poor people are richer than the poor people anywhere else in the world (in fact, our poor people have an average living space equal to that of middle class people in Europe) and we have many more rich people too. Sounds like a good deal to me.

Largely, it's due to the open and free markets we have (at least we used to have), the many hours our people work on average, our creativity and industriousness. We also have a society where a poor person with a good idea can become very wealthy quickly and a rich person can become poor quickly (even without the IRS after them). This dynamic and the great flexibility of our people is a great strength, but the price of that freedom and flexibility is an element of risk and worry.

If you want a dynamic environment, you have to have the ability to restructure quickly. We're not a country that protects buggy whip makers from the ravages of creativity. In our country, buggy whip manufacturers go out of business quickly (and those displaced workers end up at the train manufacturers or some other new and growing enterprise. The democrats are now trying to halt this dynamic and "control" it which is a large part of what's leading to our economic doldrums right now. They are trying to artificially hold prices up and are retarding the natural economic change.

Many countries will try to protect and shield the buggy whip makers from displacement and by doing so, constrain their economies and their growth potential. Its not by accident that firms like Apple, Microsoft, Dell and HP thrive here....we adapt and grow despite the perception that LT has there's no more innovation and creativity left in our hearts
 
Last edited:
lol....our poor people are richer than the poor people anywhere else in the world and we have many more rich people too. Sounds like a good deal to me.

LT would like a world where everyone was poor except for him.
Boy, you are ignorant. I run a business that thrives when everyone is rich and has assets they want to protect. It's literally more profitable for me when people have money.

Our poor aren't better off than the people in Europe. They certainly have a shorter lifespan.

At least in England your child won't be denied coverage for a liver transplant or cancer treatments like they have been denied here.

You're factually wrong on this one, dude.
 
lol....our poor people are richer than the poor people anywhere else in the world and we have many more rich people too. Sounds like a good deal to me.

LT would like a world where everyone was poor except for him.

Are you saying that poor people in the United States face greater poverty than poor people in Scandinavia? Are you really that stupid and ignorant? :confused:
 
It's all in my sig.

See also Kim Phillips-Fein Invisible Hands...the real story of the undeclared war on America's working people.
 
The roots of the war against working people go back to the New Deal. The DuPont Brothers, the FEE, Mont Pelerin Society, Liberty League, Leonard Read, Jasper Crane, National Association of Manufacturers, William J. Baroody (founder of AEI), J. Howard Pew, Clarence Manion, Lemuel Boulware, Robert Welch, the Kohler Strike....nobody knows these names.

It's not in the interest of the business special interests that control the country for these names to be known.
 
The poor in America are very well off compared to almost anywhere else in the world. Also, being poor in American is a very transient state because most people are only poor for 18 months at a time, though there is a group of about 2% who are chronically poor (census data). Being poor is mostly a result of broken homes and abandoned fathers, something that could be rectified if more of those fathers took responsibility.

Executive Summary: How Poor Are America's Poor? Examining the "Plague" of Poverty in America
by Robert Rector

Each year, the U.S. Census Bureau counts the number of "poor" persons in the U.S. In 2005, the Bureau found 37 million "poor" Americans. Presi¬dential candidate John Edwards claims that these 37 million Americans currently "struggle with incredible poverty."[1] Edwards asserts that America's poor, who number "one in eight of us…do not have enough money for the food, shelter, and clothing they need," and are forced to live in "terrible" cir¬cumstances.[2] However, an examination of the living standards of the 37 million persons, whom the government defines as "poor," reveals that what Edwards calls "the plague"[3] of American poverty might not be as "terrible" or "incredible" as candi-date Edwards contends.

But, if poverty means (as Edwards asserts) a lack of nutritious food, adequate warm housing, and clothing for a family, then very few of the 37 million people identified as living "in poverty" by the Cen-sus Bureau would, in fact, be characterized as poor. Clearly, material hardship does exist in the United States, but it is quite restricted in scope and severity.

The average "poor" person, as defined by the government, has a living standard far higher than the public imagines. The following are facts about persons defined as "poor" by the Census Bureau, taken from various government reports:

  • Forty-three percent of all poor households actu¬ally own their own homes. The average home owned by persons classified as poor by the Cen¬sus Bureau is a three-bedroom house with one-and-a-half baths, a garage, and a porch or patio.
  • Eighty percent of poor households have air conditioning. By contrast, in 1970, only 36 percent of the entire U.S. population enjoyed air conditioning.
  • Only 6 percent of poor households are over¬crowded; two-thirds have more than two rooms per person.
  • The typical poor American has more living space than the average individual living in Paris, Lon¬don, Vienna, Athens, and other cities throughout Europe. (These comparisons are to the averagecitizens in foreign countries, not to those classi¬fied as poor.)
  • Nearly three-quarters of poor households own a car; 31 percent own two or more cars.
  • Ninety-seven percent of poor households have a color television; over half own two or more color televisions.
  • Seventy-eight percent have a VCR or DVD player; 62 percent have cable or satellite TV reception.
  • Eighty-nine percent own microwave ovens, more than half have a stereo, and a more than a third have an automatic dishwasher.

Overall, the typical American defined as poor by the government has a car, air conditioning, a refrig-erator, a stove, a clothes washer and dryer, and a microwave. He has two color televisions, cable or satellite TV reception, a VCR or DVD player, and a stereo. He is able to obtain medical care. His home is in good repair and is not overcrowded. By his own report, his family is not hungry, and he had suf-ficient funds in the past year to meet his family's essential needs. While this individual's life is not opulent, it is equally far from the popular images of dire poverty conveyed by the press, liberal activists, and politicians.

Of course, the living conditions of the average poor American should not be taken as representing all of the nation's poor: There is a wide range of liv¬ing conditions among the poor. A third of "poor" households have both cell and landline telephones. A third also have telephone answering machines. At the other extreme, approximately one-tenth of fam¬ilies in poverty have no telephone at all. Similarly, while the majority of poor households do not expe¬rience significant material problems, roughly a third do experience at least one problem such as over¬crowding, temporary hunger, or difficulty getting medical care.

Much poverty that does exist in the United States can be reduced, particularly among children. There are two main reasons that American children are poor: Their parents don't work much, and their fathers are absent from the home.

In both good and bad economic environments, the typical American poor family with children is supported by only 800 hours of work during a year—the equivalent of 16 hours of work per week. If work in each family were raised to 2,000 hours per year—the equivalent of one adult working 40 hours per week throughout the year—nearly 75 percent of poor children would be lifted out of official poverty.

As noted above, father absence is another major cause of child poverty. Nearly two-thirds of poor children reside in single-parent homes; each year, an additional 1.5 million children are born out of wedlock. If poor mothers married the fathers of their children, nearly three-quarters of the nation's impoverished youth would immediately be lifted out of poverty.
 
You would have us destroy this system that's created unprecedented levels of wealth for our whole society because why....it frustrates you that some creative individual like Bill Gates came up with a more productive way for us to work and you don't like that he got rich doing it? Boo-hoo..he has too much.

Follow these democrat plans and we'll all be poor, poorer than the poor listed on the post above for sure. The democrat way is the way to ruin. Let LT praise the USSR all he wants, but it was a disaster from every perspective.
 
The roots of the war against working people go back to the New Deal. The DuPont Brothers, the FEE, Mont Pelerin Society, Liberty League, Leonard Read, Jasper Crane, National Association of Manufacturers, William J. Baroody (founder of AEI), J. Howard Pew, Clarence Manion, Lemuel Boulware, Robert Welch, the Kohler Strike....nobody knows these names.

It's not in the interest of the business special interests that control the country for these names to be known.

A lot of working people in the US have 2 or 3 cars, live in a house of 1600-2500square feet, own their own house, take vacations every year, can put their kids in college one way or another and many of them even have freakin' yachts. You don't see that much in Europe do you?
 
A lot of working people in the US have 2 or 3 cars, live in a house of 1600-2500square feet, own their own house, take vacations every year, can put their kids in college one way or another and many of them even have freakin' yachts. You don't see that much in Europe do you?
To the extent this is true, it's 100% due to the unions, which I'm sure you'd be happy to be rid of.
 
To the extent this is true, it's 100% due to the unions, which I'm sure you'd be happy to be rid of.

No, private market unions only represent 7, 8, or 9% (can't remember which). As I recall, GM and Chysler are on the ropes (Union) while BMW, Mercedes, Nissan and Honda (non union) are doing well. Wages are a little lower in the non-union shops, but not too much. The lack of animosity and the restrictive rules, I think, are the biggest differences.
 
...The Volker Fund, Roger Miliken, W.C. Mullendore, Henry Hazlitt, Spiritual Mobilization, Manion Forum of Opinion, J. William Middendorf, The Powell Memorandum, Joseph Coors.

Big Business has been waging a war on working people for more than 80 years, but they don't want you to know the details of that war. Only students of labor know the names.

For propaganda purposes they act scornful of the power of working people. The truth is somewhat different. Try organizing a union at a Wal-mart (largest employer in the USA). They'll have a union-busting strike team flown from Bentonville overnight, no matter how slender the provocation.

That's how seriously they take working people. They have whole corporate offices dedicated to spying out union efforts.

They act scornful but they fear working people like the devil fears holy water.
 
...The Volker Fund, Roger Miliken, W.C. Mullendore, Henry Hazlitt, Spiritual Mobilization, Manion Forum of Opinion, J. William Middendorf, The Powell Memorandum, Joseph Coors.

Big Business has been waging a war on working people for more than 80 years, but they don't want you to know the details of that war. Only students of labor know the names.

For propaganda purposes they act scornful of the power of working people. The truth is somewhat different. Try organizing a union at a Wal-mart (largest employer in the USA). They'll have a union-busting strike team flown from Bentonville overnight, no matter how slender the provocation.

That's how seriously they take working people. They have whole corporate offices dedicated to spying out union efforts.

They act scornful but they fear working people like the devil fears holy water.


Look, its simple. if you want better pay, then go create something of value that people will voluntarily pay for or find a job field that has high demand or find a situation where you can work your ass off and earn it. Trying to raise wage prices above what the market will bear on the threat of strike is bad for everyone in the long run and doesn't provide that elusive "job security" you so desire.
 
Look, its simple. if you want better pay, then go create something of value that people will voluntarily pay for or find a job field that has high demand or find a situation where you can work your ass of and earn it. Trying to raise wage prices above what the market will bear on the threat of strike is bad for everyone in the long run and doesn't provide that elusive "job security" you so desire.

Hence $0.50 a day in some third world country.
 
Look, its simple. if you want better pay, then go create something of value that people will voluntarily pay for or find a job field that has high demand or find a situation where you can work your ass off and earn it. Trying to raise wage prices above what the market will bear on the threat of strike is bad for everyone in the long run and doesn't provide that elusive "job security" you so desire.
Look out...unions coming for you...Boo!

Just kidding.
 
Back
Top