Netzach
>semiotics?
- Joined
- Mar 3, 2003
- Posts
- 21,732
PS. Why is this a heated argument? The subject was psychopathic subs, lol.
Because you think there's some difference between a psychopathic sub and a psychopath who isn't a sub that really REALLY matters.
And Netzach (and nobody else in the world, sure) disagrees with this train of thought, because all the safeguards, all the issues, all the red flags, all the questions are pretty much identical and it's fucking dangerous to intimate that a psychopath who has gone dangerous is less dangerous because he's a submissive, or somehow differently psychopathic, or somehow differently unable to maintain boundaries between self and world.
What exactly is the behavior in question? Since we defer to Wiki a hell of a lot, I will too.
"Although no psychiatric or psychological organization has sanctioned a diagnosis titled "psychopathy", assessments of psychopathic characteristics are widely used in criminal justice settings in some nations, and may have important consequences for individuals.[5] The term is also used by the general public, in popular press, and in fictional portrayals.[6]"
I'm not sure this is a particularly more meaningful diagnosis than "something about that guy was always a little off" after said guy is shown to be Andrew Cunanan.
(For the record, all male pronouns now refer to submissives, all Female pronouns now refer to Dominants, bear with Me.)
Last edited: