The Obamagood Thread

[sr71plt]

Several Norwegians told me they did it to annoy you.

It seems to have worked a charm.

 

[RjThoughts]

Rj answer me one question, what has Obama done in the last eight years to get that Nobel prize he paid Norway for?

You question why "normal" people view his poor leadership and the fact that everything that has happened in the world in relations to his inept polices both internal and external have been a complete failure and have allowed two bit gangs of murders and slavers to spread their racists hate with both fear and loathing. Is it normal to kiss ass criminals like the ones who run Iran, N.K., Cuba, Russia and China to name a few? Is it normal to divide your country and attack its education, it religions, it freedoms, it economy and undermine it security and laws and to rule like a little mad sheikh? Normal people will say No.

As far as the terrorist friends of his and Clinton's. World War II showed us what it was like to fight people like these. Animals with no law, with no mercy to humankind. What we found out was that you don't allow THEM to make the rules of combat. You make them. And you don't fight with one hand tied behind you. War is war. It is not a polite political game where a bunch of turncoats tell our people you can't defend yourself or do anything that might hurt the enemies feelings. What you do is take what they do and do it worst to them. You make it so they don't want to hurt our feelings.

When the enemies of WWII crossed a border, the allies crossed it. When they bombed us, we bombed them worst. The choice then is the same we have now. Be free or be slaves. Remember what the dictator of Russia once said. We will destroy you from within. The followers of Obama and Clinton are the weapons he was describing. And those weapons are working for the dictators of the world.

Explain why you want a one world order, a one world police force and that neither will be responsible to the people? This is what the AG (who had no legal right to go to the UN, but then she is so corrupt and criminal and stupid she has no idea that J walking is against the law) and the VP, who is a yes man without any spine of his own, went to the U. N. and asked for. Even the communists turned him down. (They don't want Soros either).

Trace every person who has lost their home due to terrorists, every woman and child who has been sold into slavery, every man woman and child who has been murdered by terrorist (and I don't just mean the ones in the Middle East) and if you follow the blood trail you will see it leads to Obama, Clinton, and Kerry and their polices. Believe it or not, and most of his followers refuse to believe this, he is the President, not Bush, and has been for eight years. His eight years.

Before I answer, define normal. I am a college educated middle class part-white 50+ male. Am I not normal?

 

[sr71plt]

Seriously, you had to have some sense of the world at the time Obama was elected, but a large chuck of the world's population saw him as some sort of messiah that signaled a world-changing tone of hope, reason, and acceptance. It's not really his fault that racists and haters like the OP have done everything they can to negate what not just the United States but the world at large could have had in a change of attitude toward the more human and hopeful with his presidency. I agree that the reason they gave him the Nobel Peace prize was a false one, but they were intent on giving it to him because of the opportunity he gave us to be better people--and the haters and racists in the United States were having nothing of such a change. They even have their own presidential candidate now.

It isn't the first time that the prize has given to a symbol of hope regardless of what wasn't actually accomplished because of countering forces.

 

[underguy1]

The dude was a Wall St/War St pimp all along. Just a marketing campaign to fool the rubes so the oligarchs could continue their economic rape, war mongering and political repression.

And La Clinton will be worse. She's a compulsive war monger, an oligarch in her own right and an economic illiterate.

 

[IrezumiKiss]

https://pbs.twimg.com/media/Cnbtgd3XgAEG7O1.jpg

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

wow, had to quote this. you are one stupid welfare retard

I am none of the above, but someone who is all of the above is still smarter than you.

Keep quoting me, though, long as they let you keep posting here, so you can say your posts include intelligence or facts.

 

[Sean Renaud]

Rj answer me one question, what has Obama done in the last eight years to get that Nobel prize he paid Norway for?

You question why "normal" people view his poor leadership and the fact that everything that has happened in the world in relations to his inept polices both internal and external have been a complete failure and have allowed two bit gangs of murders and slavers to spread their racists hate with both fear and loathing. Is it normal to kiss ass criminals like the ones who run Iran, N.K., Cuba, Russia and China to name a few? Is it normal to divide your country and attack its education, it religions, it freedoms, it economy and undermine it security and laws and to rule like a little mad sheikh? Normal people will say No.

As far as the terrorist friends of his and Clinton's. World War II showed us what it was like to fight people like these. Animals with no law, with no mercy to humankind. What we found out was that you don't allow THEM to make the rules of combat. You make them. And you don't fight with one hand tied behind you. War is war. It is not a polite political game where a bunch of turncoats tell our people you can't defend yourself or do anything that might hurt the enemies feelings. What you do is take what they do and do it worst to them. You make it so they don't want to hurt our feelings.

When the enemies of WWII crossed a border, the allies crossed it. When they bombed us, we bombed them worst. The choice then is the same we have now. Be free or be slaves. Remember what the dictator of Russia once said. We will destroy you from within. The followers of Obama and Clinton are the weapons he was describing. And those weapons are working for the dictators of the world.

Explain why you want a one world order, a one world police force and that neither will be responsible to the people? This is what the AG (who had no legal right to go to the UN, but then she is so corrupt and criminal and stupid she has no idea that J walking is against the law) and the VP, who is a yes man without any spine of his own, went to the U. N. and asked for. Even the communists turned him down. (They don't want Soros either).

Trace every person who has lost their home due to terrorists, every woman and child who has been sold into slavery, every man woman and child who has been murdered by terrorist (and I don't just mean the ones in the Middle East) and if you follow the blood trail you will see it leads to Obama, Clinton, and Kerry and their polices. Believe it or not, and most of his followers refuse to believe this, he is the President, not Bush, and has been for eight years. His eight years.

Actually WWII is when we decided there were formal rules of war and before that there were lots of rules people wouldn't think of breaking.

Why would I want a one world government? The same reason I want any government. Social order must be upheld.

Any other ignorance?

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Why would I want a one world government? The same reason I want any government. Social order must be upheld.

Any other ignorance?

No... You provide plenty.

For instance, last I knew, ours was the only planet/world supporting intelligent life (& less so, such as you). Also, I agree orders & laws must be upheld, but one look at recent events in our so-called (but not honestly) "United" States proves people disagree on what that order(s) is/are, & which ones need to be upheld/followed more than others.

 

[BotanyBoy]

Actually WWII is when we decided there were formal rules of war and before that there were lots of rules people wouldn't think of breaking.

LOL yea hows that worked out? We decided there would be rules on how to fuckin' suck at waging war.

At least we learned how to make some money at it.

Why would I want a one world government? The same reason I want any government. Social order must be upheld.

Any other ignorance?

I know I want some Chinese billionaire writing California policy....and great chief Jumanji from the Congo making decisions for the USA. I'm sure they will have my best interest at heart

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

LOL yea hows that worked out? We decided there would be rules on how to fuckin' suck at waging war.

At least we learned how to make some money at it.

There are no rules on how to do that, as nobody intelligently attempts to do that... One BIG reason being the costs financially & in human life.

Just change your name to BSBoy.

 

[Sean Renaud]

LOL yea hows that worked out? We decided there would be rules on how to fuckin' suck at waging war.

At least we learned how to make some money at it.



I know I want some Chinese billionaire writing California policy....and great chief Jumanji from the Congo making decisions for the USA. I'm sure they will have my best interest at heart

PRetty damn well all things considered. No two developed nations have gone to war since. I like the results just fine.

Of course they will, and besides a OWG doesn't mean you wouldn't still have local government. We currently still have far too many governments that overlap where none is needed. Somehow I don't see Wal-Marts final consolidation becoming LESS efficient than things are already but possibly.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

PRetty damn well all things considered. No two developed nations have gone to war since. I like the results just fine.

Of course they will, and besides a OWG doesn't mean you wouldn't still have local government. We currently still have far too many governments that overlap where none is needed. Somehow I don't see Wal-Marts final consolidation becoming LESS efficient than things are already but possibly.

No, but plenty of nations have gone to war without giving themselves time to develop, or developing in ways that are truly steps (if not leaps) backwards.

Also, the problem is not governments overlapping, but governments interfering. (Does anyone else see the simultaneous irony & problems the US had a Civil War, & still has people from this country killing each other, yet we rush to send people to fight &/or wars in innumerable other nations, claiming we're doing so to help them?)

 

[Sean Renaud]

No, but plenty of nations have gone to war without giving themselves time to develop, or developing in ways that are truly steps (if not leaps) backwards.

Also, the problem is not governments overlapping, but governments interfering. (Does anyone else see the simultaneous irony & problems the US had a Civil War, & still has people from this country killing each other, yet we rush to send people to fight &/or wars in innumerable other nations, claiming we're doing so to help them?)

Your first paragraph barely makes sense so I'm just going to state that countries have always gone to war. There is a difference however geopolitically (today) between France and Germany going at it and Iran and Iraq going at it.

Governments are going to interfere, but the additional freedom and safetly is going to offset that quite a bit. The irony that we had a civil war. . .I don't think you know what that word means. Perhaps you could rephrase?

The reason we send people is either the official story that we are helping them, and via helping them helping ourselves. Or it's the cynical reason and we simply like the power and influence. At the moment I'm not going to take a stand there.

 

[underguy1]

PRetty damn well all things considered. No two developed nations have gone to war since. I like the results just fine.

Of course they will, and besides a OWG doesn't mean you wouldn't still have local government. We currently still have far too many governments that overlap where none is needed. Somehow I don't see Wal-Marts final consolidation becoming LESS efficient than things are already but possibly.

Really?

 

[BotanyBoy]

There are no rules on how to do that, as nobody intelligently attempts to do that... One BIG reason being the costs financially & in human life.

Just change your name to BSBoy.

Yes there are and you're right no one attempts to do that....except they do.

Wars can't be politically correct, despite our attempts to make them so.

Just as soon as you change your name to L1tTlePeKKer

PRetty damn well all things considered. No two developed nations have gone to war since. I like the results just fine.

That doesn't have shit to do with idiot PC rules hamstringing our ability wage an effective/efficient war. That's why our hearts and minds campaign in Iraq resulted in the creation of ISIS and a huge bill. The modern liberal concept of hugs, ultra welfare and kumbyah style warfare is an epic failure because it's fucking retarded.


If you're not ready to kill everyone who says an unkind word in your direction, enslave the survivors and pillage their resources to pay the bill for having to come fuck them up then you had better stay home because you don't have the hate and grit to be starting any sort of war.

Of course they will,

LOL possibly the dumbest thing I've ever seen you post, they wouldn't give 2 pumps of rat jizz about your well being.

and besides a OWG doesn't mean you wouldn't still have local government.

It just runs rim shot over it.

Would you still be singing that tune when some uber conservatives from Japan/Korea can outlaw abortion in California and drop our min wage?

WOULDN'T THAT BE WONDERFUL!! DIVERSITY!!

We currently still have far too many governments that overlap where none is needed.

Yep. There is no need for mother fuckers in other countries or even really other states to dictate policy to California. It's simply not needed.

 

[urguyscott]

This is a fun topic, so many people willing to become slaves because it is better than being your own person and living under your own laws (laws that even the politicians must obey).

On why Obama was "given" the Nobel prize. "Several Norwegians told me they did it to annoy you. It seems to have worked a charm."

Note that this person didn't give any real reason nor anyone else. Like giving the last place team the World Series win because 'the press felt they were special and besides it would annoy all the real sports fans.' No mate, your answer is full of bull and you know it or you would have found a reason for someone gets such a high award for doing nothing. He has eight years to "win" it and hasn't.

"Before I answer, define normal. I am a college educated middle class part-white 50+ male. Am I not normal?" A poor education is still a poor education. I don't care what race or sex or religion or age you are, but I see it matters to you. There is a term for people who think your way. And still you do not defend your belief in Obama only attack those who speak out against his faults and failures and corruption.

"I agree that the reason they gave him the Nobel Peace prize was a false one, but they were intent on giving it to him because of the opportunity he gave us to be better people--and the haters and racists in the United States were having nothing of such a change. "

Opportunity? So it is OK to cheat and lie and not perform, but to give an award because some fool thinks he may have "opportunity"? So if someone lies to you it is all right if his skin is a certain color? Doesn't that make you the racists? And the fact that someone questions why a person would be awarded a prize money and award that only those who HAVE given something to the world deserve makes those people who question his being chosen "haters"? It seems that you fill the definition more than those who want an honest answer and an honest precipitant to be awarded such a prize. You like the other person do not give an answer. A normal person would want such an answer.

"Why would I want a one world government? The same reason I want any government. Social order must be upheld. "

True. Hitler and Stalin and Mao and the presidents friends in the Middle East want the same thing as you do. World Order. One Rule. A Great Police State. I see your point. A king who rules by divine right.

I understand all your answers and I realize that people who don't want to be slaves are the ones who are not normal. So crazy is now the normal.

 

[Sean Renaud]

On no, Stalin, Hitler, Mao oh my. Why do people think that Hitler did it is a valid argument?

 

[sr71plt]

Note that this person didn't give any real reason nor anyone else.

I most certainly gave a real reason. In post #1504. You just didn't want anyone to give a real reason that would upset your little hateful mind-set. The Nobel Academy has routinely given the peace prize to leaders they want to influence to lean away from belligerence. You just don't have much of a clue on the history of the award.

I didn't read any further into your post because you're just an ignorant dipshit.

 

[RjThoughts]

I most certainly gave a real reason. In post #1504. You just didn't want anyone to give a real reason that would upset your little hateful mind-set. The Nobel Academy has routinely given the peace prize to leaders they want to influence to lean away from belligerence. You just don't have much of a clue on the history of the award.

I didn't read any further into your post because you're just an ignorant dipshit.

I asked for his definition of normal and he obfuscated like a Fox News analyst or Trump and Pence on 60 Minutes.

Slaves, yeah.

 

[RjThoughts]

On no, Stalin, Hitler, Mao oh my. Why do people think that Hitler did it is a valid argument?

I'm guessing his foil hat leader Alex Jones put out his answer when I asked him a simple question.

 

[urguyscott]

I most certainly gave a real reason. In post #1504. You just didn't want anyone to give a real reason that would upset your little hateful mind-set. The Nobel Academy has routinely given the peace prize to leaders they want to influence to lean away from belligerence. You just don't have much of a clue on the history of the award.

I didn't read any further into your post because you're just an ignorant dipshit.

Like I said you have no reason for him to win the award. If you go by your definition than everyone in the world deserves the award for things they never did. And I am not hateful. Only Obama's people use that word over and over towards anyone who questions our great leader. And most people can spell dip shit correctly. LOL

When they gave the award to that young girl who had been nearly killed by the terrorist that Obama/Clinton polices have let lose on the word she had done and was doing things to influence and lean the world away from belligerence. Name anything that Obama has done to stop dictators. Kiss their butts, yes, but stop them no.

Your blind loyalty and the others on here like the one who stated "On no, Stalin, Hitler, Mao oh my. Why do people think that Hitler did it is a valid argument?" don't seem to see beyond their nose. Hitler and Stalin were not a dime difference in wanting a one world rule and what is the difference between the Soro or Terrorist desires now? Just the names change. People who do not look beyond their nose and check out the people who they back, (who backs them, where do they get their money, what is their agenda, what is their record, are they honest, are they believers in the Constitution, do they sell their influence to anyone who will pay them, do they try to divide the country, are they racists or hateful in any way, etc.)

No one has given a reason for Obama to have won the Nobel Prize. No one has given anything that will mark Obama's Administration as a good one. Like Pres. Clinton he leaves office without anything but problems behind him and nothing of merit to be remembered by. (Unless you think opening girls rest rooms and showers to perverts is something good. You know he would never allow his girls to take showers with sexual pervert.)

I know I am talking to the wall here. To be "normal" you have to keep an open mind and look at all the facts and explore the story behind the story and willing to question those who you pick to lead you. To make them responsible for their actions. I get a good laugh out of Obama's excusers by still saying it is "Bush's fault". The man hasn't been in office for eight years. And if you go by that "Bush's fault" excuse then you have to go before Bush to Clinton and before him all the way back to Washington. Over 40 of the past presidents you can be assured of would say when they were president they were the president. Obama and Clinton would be the rule difference.

So still waiting for a reason for the Nobel Prize and for Obama's legacy.

 

[phrodeau]

Like I said you have no reason for him to win the award. If you go by your definition than everyone in the world deserves the award for things they never did. And I am not hateful. Only Obama's people use that word over and over towards anyone who questions our great leader. And most people can spell dip shit correctly. LOL

When they gave the award to that young girl who had been nearly killed by the terrorist that Obama/Clinton polices have let lose on the word she had done and was doing things to influence and lean the world away from belligerence. Name anything that Obama has done to stop dictators. Kiss their butts, yes, but stop them no.

Your blind loyalty and the others on here like the one who stated "On no, Stalin, Hitler, Mao oh my. Why do people think that Hitler did it is a valid argument?" don't seem to see beyond their nose. Hitler and Stalin were not a dime difference in wanting a one world rule and what is the difference between the Soro or Terrorist desires now? Just the names change. People who do not look beyond their nose and check out the people who they back, (who backs them, where do they get their money, what is their agenda, what is their record, are they honest, are they believers in the Constitution, do they sell their influence to anyone who will pay them, do they try to divide the country, are they racists or hateful in any way, etc.)

No one has given a reason for Obama to have won the Nobel Prize. No one has given anything that will mark Obama's Administration as a good one. Like Pres. Clinton he leaves office without anything but problems behind him and nothing of merit to be remembered by. (Unless you think opening girls rest rooms and showers to perverts is something good. You know he would never allow his girls to take showers with sexual pervert.)

I know I am talking to the wall here. To be "normal" you have to keep an open mind and look at all the facts and explore the story behind the story and willing to question those who you pick to lead you. To make them responsible for their actions. I get a good laugh out of Obama's excusers by still saying it is "Bush's fault". The man hasn't been in office for eight years. And if you go by that "Bush's fault" excuse then you have to go before Bush to Clinton and before him all the way back to Washington. Over 40 of the past presidents you can be assured of would say when they were president they were the president. Obama and Clinton would be the rule difference.

So still waiting for a reason for the Nobel Prize and for Obama's legacy.

Having trouble internetting? The Nobel committee publishes their reasons for every award on their website.

https://www.nobelprize.org/nobel_prizes/peace/laureates/2009/obama-facts.html

Among the reasons it gave, the Nobel Committee lauded Obama for his "extraordinary efforts to strengthen international diplomacy and cooperation between peoples". Emphasis was also given to his support - in word and deed - for the vision of a world free from nuclear weapons.

 

[L1tTleD1fferent]

Like I said you have no reason for him to win the award.

So still waiting for a reason for the Nobel Prize and for Obama's legacy.

You have no reason to post (like many in this thread, including those claiming I am wrong), but you do so.

Why Obama's legacy? Because he is better than his predecessor, who many might call the legacy of his father (who was also a better man & President than his son/Obama's predecessor).

Why the Nobel? He earned that! Perhaps not, but as much as so many earn participation trophies, & millions of those are given out all the time!

 

[JackLuis]

How Corruption works in the NWO!

Repub's decry the TBTF Banksters! And does Hillary say they are right or..?

 

[NeverEndingMe]

history will show that obama is a fuck up