The Obamagood Thread

No, but if we had elected McCain/Palin in 2008, we would have troops in Iran by now. And they would not be doing well there. And that would be the least of our troubles.

Just because he is better than Bush, McCain, or Romney is no reason to give him a pass on his failings. Let's be honest and not hypocritical.

He has barely a "C" grade as president.
 
obama will be on welfare for the rest of its life


does that troll, the angry bitch get welfare for life as well?
 
Just because he is better than Bush, McCain, or Romney is no reason to give him a pass on his failings. Let's be honest and not hypocritical.

He has barely a "C" grade as president.

He's at least a B all things considered. Assuming we're talking standard A-F.
 
This thread is filled with things. Frankly he's been better than Bush who was the textbook C president.

And every one that isn't dog and pony show fluff came with prices so fucking steep it tones the important things down to mediocrity at best.

And for all the good he's done there is the other bills he signs that is a total 1% dick sucking evil as all fuck bill. MAKE SURE AND IGNORE THOSE!! *wink wink*:rolleyes:

You've said it yourself...... the guy is a fucking republican.
 
And every one that isn't dog and pony show fluff came with prices so fucking steep it tones the important things down to mediocrity at best.

And for all the good he's done there is the other bills he signs that is a total 1% dick sucking evil as all fuck bill. MAKE SURE AND IGNORE THOSE!! *wink wink*:rolleyes:

You've said it yourself...... the guy is a fucking republican.

Not quite.

Obama is a moderate, the sort of Republican who couldn't get elected by today's GOP, who have ran so far to the right that they have alienated anything resembling moderates.

He would be called a RINO, just like Saint Ronnie would by today's "conservative" standard.
 
Not quite.

Obama is a moderate, the sort of Republican who couldn't get elected by today's GOP, who have ran so far to the right that they have alienated anything resembling moderates.

He would be called a RINO, just like Saint Ronnie would by today's "conservative" standard.

I can agree with that.

Still....for every positive environmental push there is a Monsanto protection act.

For every positive social safety net bill there is a 1% dick suck trade agreement that make it more lucrative and easier for mega corp to ship more jobs to 3rd world slave camps.

He may have pushed HC reform through and more folks are covered.....but he sold our cherry ass's out to the 1% in the HC industry for an 80 grit dry fucking in the process.

He patched a crashing economy and pulled it out of total disaster....but he hasn't taken steps to prevent it from happening again. Hopped right back on that 1% dick for a fun ride.

He's better than Bush among some others for certain. But I couldn't give him a B.....he's trying to hard to please everyone to the point of being 'ok' at best.
 
A thrice damned centrist is what I call him and what he is. A LITTLE left of center if we're juding by American politics but yes. But I don't call him that as insult so mcuh as a matter of fact and it annoys me when people are call him the most liberal this, super socialist that and it's like. . .seriously no amount of you screaming he's a crazy person makes him one. I do wish he was a lot more extreme on many issues but I also accept that of the things he did accomplish that are "liberal" he still had to fight damn hard and we don't have a king.
 

I accidentally clicked on this while trying to come to the GB. This picture has to be the funniest thing I've ever seen. Someone who clearly knows nothing about facts is using this to promote Obama? HAHAHAHA. Oh my god.

I don't even give a shit about this thread or whether people think he does a good or shitty job. But if you're going to post evidence about your point, you might want to post something that is GOOD. At least understand what you're posting.
 
I accidentally clicked on this while trying to come to the GB. This picture has to be the funniest thing I've ever seen. Someone who clearly knows nothing about facts is using this to promote Obama? HAHAHAHA. Oh my god.

I don't even give a shit about this thread or whether people think he does a good or shitty job. But if you're going to post evidence about your point, you might want to post something that is GOOD. At least understand what you're posting.

But, not only are you coming in super late, that graphic's royally out of date. :eek:

HAHAHAHAHA Oh my god. Accidentally continue not giving a shit about this thread when you know damn well how to get to the GB on a daily basis, Dr. Livingstone!

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m79zbiuuzj1qka6b6o1_500.gif
 
This thread is filled with things. Frankly he's been better than Bush who was the textbook C president.

I asume you are talking about GHWB not "W".

GWB shouldn't be scored better than a F.

He was completely incompetent in stopping 9-11.

He started an unnecessary war in Iraq. Causing millions of casualties, costing a TRILLION dollars, not to mention the ~$24 billion the Pentagon misplaced before 9-11.

He was complicit in the perpetration of war crimes.

And last but not least, he allowed Wall Street to suck the Treasury down another Trillion bucks, and didn't even force the Banksters to, A, give up equity for the bailout, or B, face a court for fraud.

Giving "W" a C grade is ludicrous.:mad:
 
Last edited:
But, not only are you coming in super late, that graphic's royally out of date. :eek:

HAHAHAHAHA Oh my god. Accidentally continue not giving a shit about this thread when you know damn well how to get to the GB on a daily basis, Dr. Livingstone!

http://25.media.tumblr.com/tumblr_m79zbiuuzj1qka6b6o1_500.gif

Oh you dumb bastard! You can't tell that lower income, more people on food stamps and a higher poverty rate are bad things, yet you start a thread to post his awesome he is??? How do you expect to be taken seriously if you don't know that those things are bad? Who the fuck cares if it's out of date? The fact that it's there for all to see... Man that must suck. You just blindly follow your politician for nothing?

And of course I know how to get to the GB. But sometimes it's easy to click on the wrong thread from the main page.
 
I asume you are talking about GHWB not "W".

GWB shouldn't be scored better than a F.

He was completely incompetent in stopping 9-11.

He started an unnecessary war in Iraq. Causing millions of casualties, costing a TRILLION dollars, not to mention the ~$24 billion the Pentagon misplaced before 9-11.

He was complicit in the perpetration of war crimes.

And last but not least, he allowed Wall Street to suck the Treasury down another Trillion bucks, and didn't even force the Banksters to, A, give up equity for the bailout, or B, face a court for fraud.

Giving "W" a C grade is ludicrous.:mad:

G-Dub was no where near as bad as you're trying to make it out to be. First the country survived so an F just out the window. We'll know when we have an 'F' president because the day after we'll have 2 (or more) countries.

9-11 falls under shit happens.

The Iraq war caused thousands of causalties. I'm sorry but for all my bleeding heart liberalism I'm still an American ergo Iraqis are only people when I choose and they sure as fuck aren't people when we're shooting at them. 24 Billion :rolleyes: Have you seen our budget? Forgive my not carying that GW didn't remember to check all the couch cushions.

Obama's complicit in war crimes and if Clinton wasn't he just lucked into not having the opportunity to do so.

Which basically leaves us with the 1% won and he didn't have another play there and we all know it. If Obama had tried to punish them in any significant way we'd be balls deep in American Civil War II right now.
 
G-Dub was no where near as bad as you're trying to make it out to be. First the country survived so an F just out the window. We'll know when we have an 'F' president because the day after we'll have 2 (or more) countries.

9-11 falls under shit happens.(When you aren't paying attention)

The Iraq war caused thousands of causalties. I'm sorry but for all my bleeding heart liberalism I'm still an American ergo Iraqis are only people when I choose and they sure as fuck aren't people when we're shooting at them. 24 Billion :rolleyes: Have you seen our budget? Forgive my not carying that GW didn't remember to check all the couch cushions.
(Well $24 billion could make a big difference if it was in the Treasury and not floating in the wind.)

Obama's complicit in war crimes and if Clinton wasn't he just lucked into not having the opportunity to do so.
(This may be true (it is) but irrelevant to "W' piss poor performance.)

Which basically leaves us with the 1% won and he didn't have another play there and we all know it. If Obama had tried to punish them in any significant way we'd be balls deep in American Civil War II right now.

You seem to have little faith in the American justice system, but with our Supreme Court perhaps you're slightly correct.
 
Oh you dumb bastard! You can't tell that lower income, more people on food stamps and a higher poverty rate are bad things, yet you start a thread to post his awesome he is??? How do you expect to be taken seriously if you don't know that those things are bad? Who the fuck cares if it's out of date? The fact that it's there for all to see... Man that must suck. You just blindly follow your politician for nothing?

Note: This is called The Obamagood Thread.

Now, since you're "new" to these here parts and may not be keen on the lay of the land, there is an Obamabad Thread that exists. Made for the opposite reason of the Obamagood Thread. Made at the same time, even. Done in the interest of providing parity and fair share of everyone's different strokes. Yet this thread consistently charts the Billboard top twenty while that one went triple lead.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/ec/c0/90/ecc0901278b1cf475d9e42abecb81eb0.jpg

Mistakes aside, there's no policing what people choose to post and where, but why motherfuckers can't follow simple directions is not my problem. I can only reason that them same motherfuckers are just pressed whenever there are positives and progressive topics to be said about President Obama. Some of which are seen subjectively of course, but objectively overall they have been good and we are in a far better place than we were when he started.

Now, if you have druthers to the contrary, there surely is nothing stopping people from using The Obamabad Thread for that same purpose, but...here we all are. What more can I say? People does whut people does, I guess.

But since you said don't care about this either way, that's neither here nor there, I suppose! :)

And of course I know how to get to the GB. But sometimes it's easy to click on the wrong thread from the main page.

Sure. If you say so, buddy.

Bathroom's to your left, down the stairs, then make a right at the end of the hallway and you'll see a red door. :D
 
Note: This is called The Obamagood Thread.

Now, since you're "new" to these here parts and may not be keen on the lay of the land, there is an Obamabad Thread that exists. Made for the opposite reason of the Obamagood Thread. Made at the same time, even. Done in the interest of providing parity and fair share of everyone's different strokes. Yet this thread consistently charts the Billboard top twenty while that one went triple lead.

https://s-media-cache-ak0.pinimg.com/originals/ec/c0/90/ecc0901278b1cf475d9e42abecb81eb0.jpg

Mistakes aside, there's no policing what people choose to post and where, but why motherfuckers can't follow simple directions is not my problem. I can only reason that them same motherfuckers are just pressed whenever there are positives and progressive topics to be said about President Obama. Some of which are seen subjectively of course, but objectively overall they have been good and we are in a far better place than we were when he started.

Now, if you have druthers to the contrary, there surely is nothing stopping people from using The Obamabad Thread for that same purpose, but...here we all are. What more can I say? People does whut people does, I guess.

But since you said don't care about this either way, that's neither here nor there, I suppose! :)



Sure. If you say so, buddy.

Bathroom's to your left, down the stairs, then make a right at the end of the hallway and you'll see a red door. :D

Yes. Then the post you made here should've gone in the Obamabad thread.

Is there a "Zumi is a fucking idiot and doesn't know that high unemployment is bad" thread?
 
You seem to have little faith in the American justice system, but with our Supreme Court perhaps you're slightly correct.

The American Justice system I have mixed feelings about and it really depends on what exactly I'm asked and when how much faith I do or don't have in it. The Supreme Court on the other hand I actually have quite a bit of confidence in. I'm annoyed they so commonly come down the middle since most of the questions presented to them are (in theory) legal questions with a correct and incorrect answer. I admit some are "subjective" like the recent Obamacare decision where the Court essentially said "Duh, we know what you meant. It's not what you clowns wrote but we know you didn't mean that people couldn't go on these exchanges." And while that decision was in my favor the reality is they probably should have said "hey dummies, this is what you wrote it's not my fault you're a moron."

However I do remember 2009-2010 rather distinctly and even with the TINY things he did do like negotiate a deal with GM that favored labor (kinda) that Conservatives were absolutely losing their shit. Same with Obamacare and how this was the beginning of the USSA. If he'd started throwing bankers in jail or fining them enough to matter the Tea Party, the guys who were LITERALLY said if we don't win this election vs Harry Ried it may be time to look into 2nd Amendment solutions quite possibly would have.
 
Yes. Then the post you made here should've gone in the Obamabad thread.

Is there a "Zumi is a fucking idiot and doesn't know that high unemployment is bad" thread?

Hey, you're very welcome to start one if your search comes up bubkes. :)

However, doing so would show you to actually give a shit when you said you didn't care either way, especially if it's not screamingly apparent at this point in time...and may cause your peers here to create a thread called "Pmann is a fucking fake-assed liar."

https://i.warosu.org/data/g/img/0511/27/1446401461292.gif
 
A thrice damned centrist is what I call him and what he is. A LITTLE left of center if we're juding by American politics but yes. But I don't call him that as insult so mcuh as a matter of fact and it annoys me when people are call him the most liberal this, super socialist that and it's like. . .seriously no amount of you screaming he's a crazy person makes him one. I do wish he was a lot more extreme on many issues but I also accept that of the things he did accomplish that are "liberal" he still had to fight damn hard and we don't have a king.


I don't think he's socialist at all....he loves his 1%'s just as much as Bush and Clinton.....he's a run of the mill establishment democrat which is really only different from an establishment republican in what plutocrats the represent and the lies the peddle to the slaves in order to keep them happy with the ass fucking being delivered.

He didn't fight SHIT....he made a bunch of campaign promises, talked all that good shit, got in office and did a fuckin 180....not horrible...but pretty typical/average.

He may not be king but you can't tell me the son of bitch doesn't know what the fuck a veto is. He'll sign damn near ANYTHING the Republicans toss in front of him. When he should tell them to go eat a dick because he PROMISED the American people he wasn't going to just let that kind of shit happen without a fight.

No he's not some terrible communist Kenyan ninja nazi like the RW wishes and likes to pretend he is, but he sure as fuck isn't good either.....just more of the same ol' shit.
 
Last edited:
obama, the first non American to be POTUS

what a pile of pig shit, the obama's are


I accidentally clicked on this while trying to come to the GB. This picture has to be the funniest thing I've ever seen. Someone who clearly knows nothing about facts is using this to promote Obama? HAHAHAHA. Oh my god.

I don't even give a shit about this thread or whether people think he does a good or shitty job. But if you're going to post evidence about your point, you might want to post something that is GOOD. At least understand what you're posting.
 
https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CSz_HeuUwAAyPua.jpg

Obama To Announce Landmark Efforts To Help Ex-Inmates

Obama will announce landmark efforts to help ex-inmates readjust to life after incarceration.


http://img.huffingtonpost.com/asset/scalefit_630_noupscale/5637441614000093013c9a2c.jpeg

WASHINGTON, Nov 2 (Reuters) - President Barack Obama, who has made criminal justice reform a top priority of his last years in office, will announce actions on Monday to help formerly incarcerated people reintegrate into society.

The White House said the steps, to be unveiled by Obama at an appearance in Newark, New Jersey, would include up to $8 million in federal education grants over three years for former inmates as well as new guidance on the use of arrest records in determining eligibility for public and federally assisted housing.

Obama is also directing the Office of Personnel Management to take steps where possible to modify its rules in order to delay inquiries into criminal backgrounds until later in the hiring process.

"While most agencies already have taken this step, this action will better ensure that applicants from all segments of society, including those with prior criminal histories, receive a fair opportunity to compete for federal employment," the White House said in a statement.

It added that Obama was encouraged that Congress was considering a measure to "ban the box" for criminal histories for hiring by federal agencies and contractors, following the lead of some cities, states and private companies.

Noting that more than 600,000 people were released every year from state and federal prisons, the White House said: "Advancing policies and programs that enable these men and women to put their lives back on track and earn their second chance promotes not only justice and fairness, but also public safety."

Obama in July became the first sitting president to visit a federal prison. He has called on Congress to pass sentencing reform to help reduce the number of people serving long sentences for non-violent drug crimes.

With only 5 percent of the world's population, the United States accounts for about 25 percent of the world's prison population, according to the American Civil Liberties Union.


http://www.huffingtonpost.com/entry/obama-criminal-justice-reform-inmates_5637432ee4b0c66bae5ce11c?ncid=tweetlnkushpmg00000016&section=politics
 
Back
Top