RoryN
You're screwed.
- Joined
- Apr 8, 2003
- Posts
- 61,367
New administrations sometimes make mistakes.
If Obama had made the same mistake:
Hang him!!!
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
New administrations sometimes make mistakes.
Hang him!!!
Nope! not at all, but if a mistake was inevitable that was the one to make.So you're fine with that incompetence
Got it
He took responsibility for adding a journalist to a chat about national security.Nope! not at all, but if a mistake was inevitable that was the one to make.
Obama has his share.If Obama had made the same mistake:
![]()
Does your butt still hurt from mention of his name?Obama has his share.
Your semantic word game are fun.He took responsibility for adding a journalist to a chat about national security.
Oopsie!
Your excuses are fun to see.
No word games.Your semantic word game are fun.
They didn't fix the problem.No excuses. They fixed the problem.
Nope not at all.Does your butt still hurt from mention of his name?
Lol ..of course.Nope not at all.
You've been predicting that for ages, with various silly claims coming after the "after". Funny how it never materializes, isn't it?Black people are turning away from the Democrat Party after...
Which has nothing to do with what I was saying.Why is it irrelevant. He's simply saying racist will always exist around the globe.
No it doesn't. It sends a clear signal that the rest of us aren't going to grin and bear it. That's a good thing, for everyone but the racists.Calling people racist only exacerbates racism.
Yes, I do. But that's got nothing to do with my comments that he responded to.Racism exist in every culture, it's human nature. You do concede to the fact that Blacks are just as racist as other races.
Which has nothing to do with what I was saying.
No it doesn't. It sends a clear signal that the rest of us aren't going to grin and bear it. That's a good thing, for everyone but the racists.
Yes, I do. But that's got nothing to do with my comments that he responded to.
I agree. Icanthelpit in particular has a long and consistent history of accusing anyone who acknowledges that systemic racism still exists of "divisiveness". It's his go-to explanation for why he quit what he calls "the Democrat Party". Good riddance!I’m fairly convinced the MAGAts (like ineedhelp1) made / are making a conscious, concerted effort to INTERNATIONALLY NOT get the point that decent, intelligent individuals are making when it comes to the long overdue honest conversation specifically focused on the legacy effects (GENERAL disparities between black and white Americans in all areas of life) of historical institutional (public AND private institutions) racism.
I agree. Icanthelpit in particular has a long and consistent history of accusing anyone who acknowledges that systemic racism still exists of "divisiveness". It's his go-to explanation for why he quit what he calls "the Democrat Party". Good riddance!
What do you think I think it means?That statement doesn't mean what you think it means.
1. Signal is encrypted at the level of hiding your porn habit from your wife. It is not secure against determined hackers, as has been proved. Whilst extrajudicial military action against Yemen could have been anticipated, the exact time/location is always going to be secret otherwise they would have discussed it on Twitter. It wasn't the fault of the town drunk Hegseth who was only there for his glorification. Nor was it Just Dumb Vance (likewise) or Stephen Miller.New administrations sometimes make mistakes. Top secret is a stretch. You could use a biplane with a sign trailing behind telling the Houthis what was coming, it would've made no difference. The important lesson learned was any weaknesses in security protocol were found and corrected.
Van Jones is a far-left Democrat who will tell the truth about Charlie Kirk. Jones knows he was no racist.Why did you post this to this thread?
LolVan Jones is a far-left Democrat who will tell the truth about Charlie Kirk. Jones knows he was no racist.
Yes, if you're a political coalition, it's very useful to have a lock on most channels of public communication. You can shape the political battlespace. You can tell the most egregious lies about your political opponents and have them go largely unchallenged.With broad enough control, you can even turn a country's political conversation into a giant preference-falsification bubble. You can make each individual member of your political opposition feel like they're alone. Make them fear ostracism if they ever speak up. You can neutralize an opposing majority - make it feel like a fringe minority. But there's a hidden cost too, and it's one I've been contemplating lately as I observed the Democratic and left-wing reaction to the public outcry following the murders of Iryna Zarutska and Charlie Kirk.You can start believing your own propaganda. You can forget that the caricatures of your political opposition that live in your head aren't reality. You can fall further and further out of touch with what most people on the street actually think and feel and believe.
stop being a racist vile animal
Yeah, Charlie Kirk WAS (past tense) lying / gaslighting. (Not. Any. More.)
See also: This administration is the perfect example of rewarding sycophancy & slavish loyalty (and some weird FOX news nepotism) over MERIT… And almost ALL of the meritless hires have been white - which Charlie Kirk DID NOT (past tense) object to or rail against.
Hope that ^ helps.
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
does anyone like you."Smart people don't like me." The cult Supreme Leader.