The "I don't want to talk about AI" thread, and the new topic is: something that rhymes with "clicks"

I cant stand most historical fiction for exactly this reason.

We spent SIX WEEKS on The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. In Honors English! It took sooo long and they analyzed all the enjoyment out of what should have been a really fun book.
Same with The Great Gatsby. It took my wife's love for the book to even get me to watch the movie, which got me back to the book. but when I gave it a chance without analyzing it to death, I enjoyed it.

Well, to be fair, they can't really justify their teaching salary if all they do is say "here, read this book. Hope you like it. See you next week."

So instead you get, "now, let's analyze this passage next and pretend we know what Mark Twain was really trying to say"

Especially in an AP English class where they are held to a higher standard.
 
I cant stand most historical fiction for exactly this reason.

We spent SIX WEEKS on The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. In Honors English! It took sooo long and they analyzed all the enjoyment out of what should have been a really fun book.
Same with The Great Gatsby. It took my wife's love for the book to even get me to watch the movie, which got me back to the book. but when I gave it a chance without analyzing it to death, I enjoyed it.
I luckily managed to read Gatsby myself before getting it in English class. English class also wasn't generally as bad as Danish, because some of the focus had to be on language and cultural differences.

I read extremely few books in Danish though. If it's in Danish and it's about somewhat normal people not in an extreme situation, my brain goes "Blech! Literature class!" and just turns off. Sometimes happens with English books too, but less.
----------------------------------------------------------------
Well, to be fair, they can't really justify their teaching salary if all they do is say "here, read this book. Hope you like it. See you next week."

So instead you get, "now, let's analyze this passage next and pretend we know what Mark Twain was really trying to say"

Especially in an AP English class where they are held to a higher standard.
There are a lot of ways to do that though. I had one year in high school with a Danish teacher who was brilliant. He actually found interesting material and was novel and adventurous about how to approach the texts. Not just the same schematic analysis, or minute inspection of a minor detail which the class has clearly been tired of since minute three. He kinda managed to save the concept of poetry for me.
 
I think it helps to see the conflict in the story as (at least in part) nature versus industry.
This precisely. Mordor with its smoking chimneys is partly based on what happened to Salford during Tolkien’s lifetime. Going from rural in his childhood to heavily industrialized. His experiences in the First World War are obviously another motivation.

Tolkien is far from the only author to feature long descriptive passages. But critics love to find something to cling on to.

I can sometimes find the royalty worship and the male-dominated world jarring. Then he was a man of his times. As someone who by his actions demonstrated a healthy disrespect for racism, I don’t find this as problematic in his writing.

He was a Catholic conservative and establishment member. But his conservatism was literal, he wanted to preserve what he believed was a superior status quo for the benefit of all (erroneously IMO).

You may not like LOTR, nothing says you have to, but Tolkien’s actual writing is elegant and often beautiful. I for one love the pictures of nature the suffuse his work.
 
I cant stand most historical fiction for exactly this reason.

We spent SIX WEEKS on The Adventures of Tom Sawyer. In Honors English! It took sooo long and they analyzed all the enjoyment out of what should have been a really fun book.
Same with The Great Gatsby. It took my wife's love for the book to even get me to watch the movie, which got me back to the book. but when I gave it a chance without analyzing it to death, I enjoyed it.
But once you understand *how* to analyse, you can apply that to other books. Often you'll start to recognise themes and symbolism without consciously thinking about them. And that can help you read the story on multiple different levels.

Ages ago, in the Fairy Tales Writing Exercise thread, I mentioned that Jack and the Beanstalk was a coming-of-age story: the beanstalk is Jack's (ahum) "changing body", the ogre who lives in the clouds is his father (because when you're small, your father is generally little more than a booming voice hidden behind a big beard that's high in the sky). And for Jack to find his independence as a man he has to stand up to his father and assert his own manhood.

Understanding stuff like that, even subconsciously, means that you get two stories for the price of one.
 
the royalty worship
This was definitely of his time, but - without having studied all the background material - I'd say this is closely tied to the "nature v. industry" theme.

It was a common theme in medieval literature for the health of the land to be tied to the health of the ruler. Above I mentioned being wounded in the thigh as a symbol of castration. This is a key to understanding the Percival stories: when Percival finds his grandfather the Fisher King, it turns out that a "wound in the thigh" prevents him from hunting (so he has to fish), and as a result the lands are fallow. (There's also a big thing about nature's cycles, and sun gods.) The land can only be healed if Percival becomes the king, because he's "whole".

The same thing happens in LotR. Elendil's broken sword signifies the power of the kings being in decline and the lands turning slowly to ruin. Aragorn, with the cock sword reforged, has the same power and stature as Elendil, which none of his other ancestors had. So his kingship is about making the lands whole again, because finally there's a "whole" king on the throne.

To a lesser extent this happens with Rohan as well: while Theoden is weak, so is Rohan. But when Gandalf heals him, the country and the Riders regain their vigour and start winning battles.
 
But once you understand *how* to analyse, you can apply that to other books. Often you'll start to recognise themes and symbolism without consciously thinking about them. And that can help you read the story on multiple different levels.
Problem isn't the idea of teaching analysis. It's the way it's taught, and probably also that (at least here) they start doing it at an age where extremely few students really have the capacity. This means that by the time you get to a point where you maybe could actually apply some of this in a non-destructive way to something you actually want to read, you're conditioned to despise that entire way of thinking. Sometimes to despise entire branches of literature (that's where I'm at), or just reading in general.

I get that it's not easy to find a way to make elementary/middle school students both learn methods and enjoy reading at the same time. Often repetition is needed to some degree to get things to stick, especially with children. My argument would be that maybe it's a better idea to just not, until they're older. If schools destroy people's enjoyment of literature as a whole, they're never going to use those methods anyway.

Sorry, I'll stop now. We just happened to hit a subject I feel pretty strongly about on a personal level. :)
 
Tolkien's so-called long-windedness is overblown. The Lord of the Rings as a whole is a little over 1000 pages. And it's far more epic in scope than dozens of fantasy series published since, which are many times longer (if they get finished at all).

Maybe it's time to change the thread title to "Who needs school and books? Watch the movie instead!" Fun take for a group of writers.
 
This was definitely of his time, but - without having studied all the background material - I'd say this is closely tied to the "nature v. industry" theme.

It was a common theme in medieval literature for the health of the land to be tied to the health of the ruler. Above I mentioned being wounded in the thigh as a symbol of castration. This is a key to understanding the Percival stories: when Percival finds his grandfather the Fisher King, it turns out that a "wound in the thigh" prevents him from hunting (so he has to fish), and as a result the lands are fallow. (There's also a big thing about nature's cycles, and sun gods.) The land can only be healed if Percival becomes the king, because he's "whole".

The same thing happens in LotR. Elendil's broken sword signifies the power of the kings being in decline and the lands turning slowly to ruin. Aragorn, with the cock sword reforged, has the same power and stature as Elendil, which none of his other ancestors had. So his kingship is about making the lands whole again, because finally there's a "whole" king on the throne.

To a lesser extent this happens with Rohan as well: while Theoden is weak, so is Rohan. But when Gandalf heals him, the country and the Riders regain their vigour and start winning battles.
I agree entirely (though I haven’t read the other works you mention). Tolkien seems to have bought into the medieval view that rulers were ordained by God and therefore godlike and different to the rest of us. And the linkage between the health / presence of Kings and the well-being of a land is very obvious.
 
I get that it's not easy to find a way to make elementary/middle school students both learn methods and enjoy reading at the same time.
From what I hear from friends and relatives with kids, there does seem to be a sense in which the joy of reading is sometimes suppressed by technical aspects of Language Arts. And many say that they start literary criticism way too early.
 
Maybe it's time to change the thread title to "Who needs school and books? Watch the movie instead!" Fun take for a group of writers.
Yes yes, the fact that I have a different take on a book we both enjoy and that I had shitty teachers clearly makes me a lesser writer than you, I bow my head in shame at your greatness. :ROFLMAO:

Edit: I will admit to probably being a lesser writer, but not for those reasons. 😉
 
I agree entirely (though I haven’t read the other works you mention). Tolkien seems to have bought into the medieval view that rulers were ordained by God and therefore godlike and different to the rest of us. And the linkage between the health / presence of Kings and the well-being of a land is very obvious.
I don't know whether he personally bought into it - I suspect he might have been left quite disillusioned by his WWI experiences, but again, I've never bothered with all the background books - but it's definitely a deliberate theme in Middle Earth.
 
Luckily for me, I had the world's best librarian in my city. I was in a weekly book club from the 5th through the 10th grade, going through on average 3 novels a week. It was a Newbery Award fan club. We attempted as a group to read every book published that year in the US for the Newbery Award age group. And we generally succeeded!

Theresa had us read different books and come together once a week to defend the ones we thought were good and maybe explain why we strongly disliked something popular.

We were kept to a 2 minute timer and had to explore why a title was "good literature" rather than just something we enjoyed reading. We got to debate the actual merits of the books we read.

Theresa always facilitated conversation, never shut down anyone's interpretation- but she wouldn't accept just "I liked it." Or "it was fun." She'd make you explain more, dig deeper. But it was still YOUR analysis and it felt amazing to realize you had made it!

So I learned how to read for comprehension and analysis AND joy, all at once.

Thank God for children's librarians.
 
I did some research and now I'm convinced it's just dicks all the way down

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." - definitely talking about his dick
"The sky above the port was grey, the color of a television tuned to a dead channel"- talking about his dick and it's gross
"Call me Ishmael" - the name of the book is Moby Dick, and it's basically a dick pic in novel form
"With a gun in your mouth, you only speak in vowels" - Chuck Palaniuk wasn't even trying to hide it
 
I don't know whether he personally bought into it - I suspect he might have been left quite disillusioned by his WWI experiences, but again, I've never bothered with all the background books - but it's definitely a deliberate theme in Middle Earth.
Yes - and Tolkien is a great example of where he was explicitly looking to create something that echoed The Elder Edda. A mythology for England as he said. And of course he embodied many of the earlier themes.

While a study of the man informs his writing, of course he wrote some things that were purely authorial choices, like we all do.
 
Yes yes, the fact that I have a different take on a book we both enjoy and that I had shitty teachers clearly makes me a lesser writer than you, I bow my head in shame at your greatness. :ROFLMAO:

Edit: I will admit to probably being a lesser writer, but not for those reasons. 😉

Maybe this thread is getting too serious. It's gone off the rails of fun and descended into a discussion about the craft!

I didn't intend to attack or insult anyone.

Just a little surprised to come into a thread on an Authors' forum to see people saying Yeah, we should stop teaching literature in schools.

Anyway. Star Wars: am I right?
 
I did some research and now I'm convinced it's just dicks all the way down

"It was the best of times, it was the worst of times." - definitely talking about his dick
"The sky above the port was grey, the color of a television tuned to a dead channel"- talking about his dick and it's gross
"Call me Ishmael" - the name of the book is Moby Dick, and it's basically a dick pic in novel form
"With a gun in your mouth, you only speak in vowels" - Chuck Palaniuk wasn't even trying to hide it

Fahrenheit 451 "It was a pleasure to burn."
Clearly he had an STD and enjoyed it, the freak.

Catch-22: "It was love at first sight."
She saw his penis

Pride and Prejudice "It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good fortune must be in want of a wife."
Well, duh
 
This was definitely of his time, but - without having studied all the background material - I'd say this is closely tied to the "nature v. industry" theme.
Tolkien specifically was writing English mythology in an Anglo-Saxon tradition. And while the story is filled with great kings and their doings, the idealized state of the English people is a cooperative democracy. Yeah, they have a king... who leaves them well alone and is largely ceremonial. Civil authority is in the hands of an elected mayor, but that's also reasonably nominal, and is mostly devolved to respected burghers.
 
Back
Top