Bramblethorn
Sleep-deprived
- Joined
- Feb 16, 2012
- Posts
- 18,892
Agreed.There are adverbs and adverbs. These are obviously okay, even necessary:
Walked quickly
Coughed quietly
That's part of it - when done in a limited-perspective narrative, it can feel like a soft kind of head-hopping, unless the narrator knows the emoter well enough to be confident in interpreting their emotes.I think the argument here is about whether the reader can have privileged access to people's inner state (which is also fine, if you're writing omniscient, which I never do).
So:
"I disagree," she said bravely (as I mentioned in another thread, JK Rowling does this a lot) - I avoid this, preferring e.g.
"I disagree", she said, meeting my gaze.
But even in omniscient I'd encourage authors to think about whether there are better ways to convey this kind of thing. @iwatchus mentioned show-vs.-tell above; well, when I write "angrily" I'm telling that character's mental state, just as much as if I'd written "he was angry". While I don't espouse show-don't-tell as an absolute rule it's often a good idea for key scenes and there are several ways I could show the character's anger here.
- I could write something like "His face reddened and he sprayed flecks of spittle as he shouted at me".
- Or I could write "His eyes hardened and he spoke in a cold monotone." Still conveying anger, but a different kind of anger.
- I could convey anger through his dialogue, by the words he uses.
- Or, if I've done a good enough job establishing how much this guy loves his rose garden, and the damage I inadvertently did while backing my car over it, the reader may already know that he's going to be furious before he ever opens his mouth.
(OTOH, sometimes pacing calls for getting through a scene in a hurry, and at times like that a brief "tell" might be preferable to a more detailed "show".)