the george bush song

tassie

Really Experienced
Joined
Jul 15, 2002
Posts
295
The George Bush song

If you're happy and you know it, bomb Iraq
If you cannot find Osama, bomb Iraq.
If the terrorists are frisky, Pakistan is looking shifty, North Korea is too risky, Bomb Iraq.

It's "pre-emptive non-aggression", bomb Iraq.
Let's prevent this mass destruction, bomb Iraq.
They've got weapons we can't see,
And that's good enough for me 'Cos
it's all the proof I need, so Bomb Iraq.

If you never were elected, bomb Iraq.
If your mood is quite dejected, bomb Iraq.
If you think Saddam's gone mad, With the weapons that he had, (And he tried to kill your dad), then Bomb Iraq.

If your corporate fraud is growing, bomb Iraq.
If your ties to it are showing, bomb Iraq.
If your politics are sleazy, And hiding that ain't easy, And your manhood's getting queasy, Bomb Iraq.

If we have no allies with us, bomb Iraq.
If we think someone has 'dissed' us, bomb Iraq.
So to hell with the inspections, Let's look tough for the elections,
Close your mind and take directions, Bomb Iraq.

Fall in line and follow orders, bomb Iraq.
For our might knows not our borders, bomb Iraq.
Disagree? We'll call it treason, Let's make war not love this season,
Even if we have no reason, Bomb Iraq.

The message from George Bush, "Blame Iraq for all our problems!!"
 
I'd prefer to hear that song over the "a U.S. city just got nuked" song
 
so it's ok if people die as long as they aren't american?
 
In short — yes. I'd rather see Saddam Hussein and his willing minions killed than Americans. They'd rather see us dead than them (or, depending on their flavor, they can seem them and us dead at the same time) — why not turn it against them?

I realize some innocents will die, but sadly, it's an unavoidable consequence of even the most just war. But the difference between us and them is that we take great precaution not to include innocents — if they had their way, they'd take great precaution to include as many innocents as possible.

TB4p
 
Is it ok to have weapons of mass destruction and threaten other people with them if you dont agree with the way they live their lives then?
 
tassie said:
Is it ok to have weapons of mass destruction and threaten other people with them if you dont agree with the way they live their lives then?
That's an incredibly reductive and absolutely wrong assessment of the problem at hand.

We don't like the way a lot of countries live their lives; but we don't consider them dangerous threats to us.

And we're also not "threatening" anybody with WMD's, unless they strike first with them. Again, another difference; we'll only use those weapons in defense.

TB4p
 
surely going over to iraq and bombing them is Offensive rather than Defensive?

I'm annoyed for two reasons

1) Because it seems that Bush has decided that we're going in whatever Blix says

and 2) He's made me agree with a fucking psycho like Saddam.

Hanns, thanks for the support babe :kiss:
 
Hehe I loved the song and rather true unfortunately.

Mind you, I like North Korea's commentthe other day that they too would consider a "pre-emptive strike in self defence".

No i don't expect them to actually do it and pray to god they don't, but I hope it made a few people think.

/wave
QD
 
tassie said:


1) Because it seems that Bush has decided that we're going in whatever Blix says

2) He's made me agree with a fucking psycho like Saddam.


Hmmm. Blix is saying that the Franco-German plan just won't work because the issue is not the number of inspectors, it's Iraq's lack of cooperation.

How are you agreeing with Saddam?
 
tassie said:
surely going over to iraq and bombing them is Offensive rather than Defensive?

I'm annoyed for two reasons

1) Because it seems that Bush has decided that we're going in whatever Blix says

and 2) He's made me agree with a fucking psycho like Saddam.

Hanns, thanks for the support babe :kiss:

How many years have they been violating UN resolutions? They've proven they don't care about living up to them. The UN has proven that it doesn't care about enforcing them.

Somebody's gotta do something.
Even Clinton realized that when he signed the Iraq Liberation Act. Signing into law the objective of regime change in Iraq. He just choose to do it by funding rebels(or terrorists depending on your point of view)

I prefer Bush's straightforward approach to Clinton's pussyfooting. But then that's what made Clinton so popular. Could dance around any issue without fully committing to anything.
 
Not Blix, Bush.

I think we shouldn't bomb iraq, and so does Saddam. therefore, we agree with each other.

which means im with the french and germans too. bugger.
 
I don't think Saddam would mind being bombed too much.

He'd just have his human shields out there at gunpoint soaking up civilian casualties and rally more countries to his "side".
 
The appeasers will kill civilians..

The song is cute, the accuracy is false. The more we are stalled on the Iraq engagement, the more time Sodamn Insane can move cilvilians into target areas. Not only will the "peace/anti-bush/america" movement cause more civilian deaths, but more coalition forces will be killed because of having to take more care to not kill civilians, thanks a fucking lot, losers!

"In violation of the Geneva Conventions, Saddam Hussein is positioning military forces within civilian populations in order to shield his military and blame coalition forces for civilian casualties that he has caused," Bush told in a speech.

"Saddam Hussein regards the Iraqi people as human shields, entirely expendable, when their suffering serves his purposes," Bush said.

Washington is threatening to lead an attack on Iraq unless Baghdad declares and dismantles its suspected chemical, biological and nuclear arms programs.

Traditional U.S. allies are divided over whether to go to war or use more diplomacy and more time. France, Germany and Belgium on Monday blocked a NATO plan to strengthen Turkish defenses against Iraq in readiness for hostilities.

If the United States wages war against Iraq, Bush said, "we will try in every way we can to spare innocent life. The people of Iraq are not our enemies."
 
On War

Sorry for the long cut and paste, but I find this appropriate. Keep in mind that the original comment was made just after Gulf War Part 1

By George Carlin

I'd like to talk a little about that "war" we had in the Persian Gulf. Remember that? The big war in the Persian Gulf? Lemme tell you what's goin' on.

Naturally, you can forget that entertaining fiction about having to defend the model democracy those lucky Kuwaitis get to live under. And for the moment you can also put aside the very real, periodic need Americans have for testing their new weapons on human flesh. And also, just for the fun of it, let's ignore George Bush's obligation to protect the oil interests of his family and friends. There was another, much more important, consideration at work. Here's what really happened.

The simple fact is that America was long overdue to drop high explosive on helpless civilians; people who have no argument with us whatsoever. After all, had been a while, and the hunger gnaws. Remember that's our specialty: picking on countries that have marginally effective air forces. Yugoslavia is another, more recent, example.

But all that aside, let me tell you what I liked about the Gulf War: it was the first war that appeared on every television channel, including cable. And even though the TV show consisted largely of Pentagon war criminals displaying maps and charts, it got very good ratings. And that makes sense, because we like war. We're warlike people. We can't stand not to be fucking with someone. We couldn't wait for the Cold War to end so we could climb into the big Arab sandbox and play with our nice new toys. We enjoy war.

And one reason we enjoy it is that we're good at it. You know why we're good at it? Because we get a lot of practice. This country is only 200 years old, and already we've had ten major wars. We average a major war every twenty years. So we're good at it.

We can bomb the shit outta your country! Especially of you country is full of brown people. Oh, we like that, don't we? That's our hobby now. But it's also our new job in the world: bombing brown people. Iraq, Panama, Grenada, Libya. You got some brown people in your country? Tell 'em to watch the fuck out, or we'll goddamn bomb them!

Well, who were the last white people you can remember that we bombed? In fact, can you remember any white people we ever bombed? The Germans! That's it! Those are the only ones. And that was only because they were trying to cut in on our action. They wanted to dominate the world. Bullshit! That's our job. That's our fucking job.

But the Germans are ancient history. These days, we only bomb brown people. And not because they're cutting in on our action; we do it because they are brown. Even those Serbs we bombed in Yugoslavia aren't really white, are they? Naaaah! They're sort of down near the swarthy end of the white spectrum. Just brown enough to bomb.

And you notice that I don't feel about that war the way I've been instructed to feel. There's this real moron thing I do; it's called "thinking." I'm not a good American because I form my own opinions, I won't roll over when I'm told. I also look at war itself a little differently from most. I see it largely as an exercise in dick-waving. That's really all it is: a lot of men standing around a field waving their dicks at one another. Men, insecure about the size of their penises, choose to kill one another.

That's also what all that moron athlete bullshit is about, and what that macho, male posturing and strutting around in bars and locker rooms represents. It's called "dick fear." Men are terrified that their dicks are inadequate, and so they have to "compete" in order to feel better about themselves. And since war is the ultimate competition, essentially men are killing one another in order to improve their genital self-esteem.

You needn't be a historian or a political scientist to see the Bigger Dick Foreign Policy Theory at work. It goes like this: "What? They have bigger dicks? Bomb them!" And of course, the bombs, the rockets, and the bullets are all shaped like penises. Phallic weapons. There is an unconscious need to project the national penis into the affairs of others. It's called "fucking with people."

So, as far as I'm concerned, that whole thing in the Persian Gulf was nothing more than one big dick-waving cockfight. In this particular case, Saddam Hussein questioned the size of George Bush's dick. And George Bush had been called a wimp (and remember "wimp" rhymes with "limp") for so long, he apparently felt the need to act out his manhood fantasies by sending America's white children to kill other people's brown children. Clearly the worst kind of wimp.

Even his name, "Bush," as slang, is related to the genitals without actually being the genitals. A bush is sort of a passive, secondary sex characteristic. It's even used as a slang term for women: "Hey, pal, how's the bush around here?" I can't help thinking, if this president's name had been George Boner... well, he might have felt a little better about himself, and he wouldn't have had to kill all those people.

Actually, when you think of it, this country has had a manhood problem for some time. You can tell by the language we use; language always gives us away. What did we do wrong in Vietnam? We "pulled out"! Not a very manly thing to do. No. When you're fucking people, you're supposed to stay with it and fuck them good; fuck them to death; hang in there and keep fucking them until they're all fucking dead.

But in Vietnam what happened was by accident we left a few women and children alive, and we haven't felt good about ourselves since. That's why in the Persian Gulf, George Bush had to say, "This will not be another Vietnam." He actually said, "this time we are going all the way." Imagine. An American president using the sexual slang of a thirteen year old to describe his foreign policy.

And, of course, when we got right down to it, he didn't "go all the way." Faced with going into Baghdad he punked out. No balls. Just Bush. Instead he applied sanctions, so he'd be sure that an extra half a million brown children would die. And so his oil buddies could continue to fill their pockets.

If you want to know what happened in the Persian Gulf, just remember the first names of the two men who ran the war: Dick Chenney and Colin Powell. Dick and colon. Someone got fucked in the ass. And those brown people better make sure they keep their pants on, because Dick and Colin have come back for an encore.
 
Last edited:
It's funny 'cause it's true . . .

Dennis Miller
"The Tonight Show With Jay Leno"
January 29, 2003

"Sean Penn, for instance, is urging restraint. What could we possibly say to Sean to get him on board? If only Saddam Hussein was a paparazzi . . .

"I don't need to see any smoking guns except the one that just killed Saddam Hussein, quite frankly . . .

"The French are in the ballbuster business . . . why do you think the only French Americans know is 'Au contraire'? . . . The only way the French are going in is if we tell them we found truffles in Iraq . . . The French are always reticent to surrender to the wishes of their friends and always more than willing to surrender to the wishes of their enemies . . .

"The only thing the Germans ever give blesses to is their sneezes . . .

"I think we should make our entire Air Force those unmanned drones . . . I got a 12 yr old, if you gave him a Barca-Lounger, a bag of Doritos and a toggle switch, he could fly one of those right up Saddam Hussein's ass . . .

"North Korea is the real reason we're fighting Iraq . . . When we're done turning Iraq to glass, we turn to North Korea and say 'You wanna piece of this, motherfucker?' . . . "


TB4p
 
Back
Top