The FUCK YOU, Cunt Clinton thread, will be here 10 yrs, at least
- Thread starter Busybody
- Start date
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Hillary Consults With Fellow Rich People On How To Talk ‘Income Inequality’ Without Alienating Them…
Why bother? She has a “D” next to her name so we all know liberals will give her a pass regardless.
Via Capitol City Project:
Hillary Clinton is actively seeking help on how to approach the ever-dividing talk of “income inequality” and asked one group of people in particular how to discuss the issue without alienating a major base with the means of providing massive funds: the 1 percent.
Hillary spent the month of August lavishly, as the New York Times reports, residing at the elite Hamptons and asking Wall Streeters and other extremely wealthy individuals how she could approach the subject without turning off those exact people with vast loads of money. During this month-long retreat, she mingled with rich liberal mega-donors, lobbyists, and businessmen.
“Among those who have held Hamptons events for Clinton is Susie Tompkins Buell, a long-time Clinton donor, who is a member of the secretive Democracy Alliance. Multiple members of the liberal donor club have already announced their support for Clinton,” the Washington Free Beacon reported.
Why bother? She has a “D” next to her name so we all know liberals will give her a pass regardless.
Via Capitol City Project:
Hillary Clinton is actively seeking help on how to approach the ever-dividing talk of “income inequality” and asked one group of people in particular how to discuss the issue without alienating a major base with the means of providing massive funds: the 1 percent.
Hillary spent the month of August lavishly, as the New York Times reports, residing at the elite Hamptons and asking Wall Streeters and other extremely wealthy individuals how she could approach the subject without turning off those exact people with vast loads of money. During this month-long retreat, she mingled with rich liberal mega-donors, lobbyists, and businessmen.
“Among those who have held Hamptons events for Clinton is Susie Tompkins Buell, a long-time Clinton donor, who is a member of the secretive Democracy Alliance. Multiple members of the liberal donor club have already announced their support for Clinton,” the Washington Free Beacon reported.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Name ONE accomplishment, PUSSY PELOSI
Pelosi: Pant Suits “One Of The Best Qualified People To Enter White House”…
Does being a life-long hack prepare you for the presidency? Pelosi seems to think so.
Via PJ Media:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she believes Hillary Clinton would be one of the best prepared candidates for the presidency, who “just happens to be a woman.” [...]
“First of all, we have to find out if Hillary is going to run. She seemed very ready in Iowa at the steak fry,” Pelosi told MSNBC today.
“If she decides to run, which I think she will, she would be one of the best qualified people to enter the White House,” she said. “Really, she has been a senator and she has seen firsthand as first lady what the job entails. She has been secretary of state. She really brings so much experience to it.”
Pelosi: Pant Suits “One Of The Best Qualified People To Enter White House”…
Does being a life-long hack prepare you for the presidency? Pelosi seems to think so.
Via PJ Media:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she believes Hillary Clinton would be one of the best prepared candidates for the presidency, who “just happens to be a woman.” [...]
“First of all, we have to find out if Hillary is going to run. She seemed very ready in Iowa at the steak fry,” Pelosi told MSNBC today.
“If she decides to run, which I think she will, she would be one of the best qualified people to enter the White House,” she said. “Really, she has been a senator and she has seen firsthand as first lady what the job entails. She has been secretary of state. She really brings so much experience to it.”
M
miles
Guest
Name ONE accomplishment, PUSSY PELOSI
Pelosi: Pant Suits “One Of The Best Qualified People To Enter White House”…
Does being a life-long hack prepare you for the presidency? Pelosi seems to think so.
Via PJ Media:
House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.) said she believes Hillary Clinton would be one of the best prepared candidates for the presidency, who “just happens to be a woman.” [...]
“First of all, we have to find out if Hillary is going to run. She seemed very ready in Iowa at the steak fry,” Pelosi told MSNBC today.
“If she decides to run, which I think she will, she would be one of the best qualified people to enter the White House,” she said. “Really, she has been a senator and she has seen firsthand as first lady what the job entails. She has been secretary of state. She really brings so much experience to it.”
More proof that liberalism is a mental disorder.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
BUSTED: Hillary Clinton poses with for picture with steak…people notice something weird
Hillary is obsessed with trying to make it seem like she is a “woman of the people”.
Remember how she said her and Bill were “dead broke” when they left the White House?
Well, she strikes again.
hillary grills fake burger
Here she is pretending to grill a steak that has already been pre-cooked for her. This wasn’t for a magazine cover or something, this was at a public even in front of thousands of people. So much fail, so little time from ol’ Hillary. Not a genuine bone in her entire body.
From NRO:
“While a crowd of several thousand Democrats waited on a sloping, grassy field below, Mrs Clinton, her husband and Senator Harkin staged a mini-grilling of steaks for the press at a single barbecue grill in a fenced-off enclosure, framed by a handsome tree and a picnic table filled with some patient Iowans. Mrs Clinton gamely posed, pretending to grill a steak that had been pre-cooked for her.”
Read more: http://youngcons.com/epic-fail-hill...end-that-shes-grilling-a-steak/#ixzz3DVbt5U67
Read more at http://youngcons.com/epic-fail-hill...at-shes-grilling-a-steak/#GTfcbPYk3x2KOJxZ.99
Hillary is obsessed with trying to make it seem like she is a “woman of the people”.
Remember how she said her and Bill were “dead broke” when they left the White House?
Well, she strikes again.
hillary grills fake burger
Here she is pretending to grill a steak that has already been pre-cooked for her. This wasn’t for a magazine cover or something, this was at a public even in front of thousands of people. So much fail, so little time from ol’ Hillary. Not a genuine bone in her entire body.
From NRO:
“While a crowd of several thousand Democrats waited on a sloping, grassy field below, Mrs Clinton, her husband and Senator Harkin staged a mini-grilling of steaks for the press at a single barbecue grill in a fenced-off enclosure, framed by a handsome tree and a picnic table filled with some patient Iowans. Mrs Clinton gamely posed, pretending to grill a steak that had been pre-cooked for her.”
Read more: http://youngcons.com/epic-fail-hill...end-that-shes-grilling-a-steak/#ixzz3DVbt5U67
Read more at http://youngcons.com/epic-fail-hill...at-shes-grilling-a-steak/#GTfcbPYk3x2KOJxZ.99
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
(IBD) Hillary's "Plumbers" Hid #Benghazi Documents In State Department Basement http://******/BxiVf
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
You're making the Palin haters look positively sane...
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Clinton ‘Correct the Record’ Site Lies About the Record on Benghazi
By Fred Fleitz
September 17, 2014 11:32 AM
We all know many politicians lie and play games with the truth. But when supporters of an American politician find it necessary to set up an elaborate website devoted to “correcting the record” on that politician’s statements and actions, we’re talking about a champion prevaricator. That is, we’re talking about a Clinton.
This site, CorrectRecord.org, is a slick operation run by American Bridge 21st Century, a group founded by David Brock that conducts opposition research for Democratic candidates. The site is aimed at promoting Hillary Clinton’s possible presidential run and particularly geared to defend her against the many growing controversies stemming from her tenure as secretary of state, especially how she handled the 2012 terrorist attacks on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi.
One of these controversies is whether Secretary Clinton and her staff engaged in a cover-up of the Obama administration’s statements and policies related to the Benghazi terrorist attacks. New life was breathed into this issue this week due to a report by journalist Sharyl Attkisson that Clinton confidants were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to a State Department Accountability Review Board formed to investigate the Benghazi attacks.
After a quick review of the Benghazi area of the Correct the Record site, I quickly found a false statement. In a box that begins with “COVER UP FALSE,” there is this language:
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence bipartisan report concluded there “were no efforts by the White House or any other Executive Branch entities” to cover-up facts or make alterations to talking points for political purposes. Former CIA Director David Petraeus confirmed the Benghazi talking points process was normal.
But the citation in this box is not from the bipartisan body of the January 2014 Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on the Benghazi attacks – it’s partisan language taken from pages 4 and 5 of an appendix containing the additional views of the committee’s Democratic members.
It’s fine for Correct the Record to cite this language, but it only reflects views of the Democratic members of the committee. Republican members held very different views.
In fact, six of the committee’s seven Republican members were harshly critical of the Obama administration’s truthfulness about the Benghazi attacks and said the following in their own additional views to the report:
Rather than provide Congress with the best intelligence and on-the-ground assessments, the Administration chose to try to frame the story in a way that minimized any connection to terrorism. Before the Benghazi attacks—in the lead-up to the 2012 presidential election, the administration continued to script the narrative that al-Qaeda had been decimated and on the run. The Benghazi terrorist attacks inconveniently, and overwhelmingly, interfered with this fictitious and false narrative.
The additional views by the six Republicans also rejected the charge that the CIA was at fault for erroneous language in the Benghazi talking points, noting that e-mails reluctantly released to the committee clearly show the White House was asked to coordinate on the talking points from the earliest moments and had the final say in approving them. The six Republican members noted that this does not comport with what Acting CIA Director Morell told the intelligence committees in November 2012.
. . . in spite of his [CIA Director Petraeus] own misgivings, the final content of the talking points was the ‘[National Security Staff’s] call, to be sure.’ In contrast, the Acting Director’s testimony perpetuated the myth that the White House played no part in the drafting or editing of the talking points.
So a pro-Clinton group is trying to discredit allegations that Hillary Clinton was involved in a cover-up of how the Obama administration handled the terrorist attacks on the Benghazi consulate by falsely claiming a bipartisan Senate report exonerates her.
How Clintonian.
— Fred Fleitz is a former CIA analyst and senior staff member with the House Intelligence Committee. He is currently a senior fellow with the Center for Security Policy and chief analyst with LIGNET.com.
By Fred Fleitz
September 17, 2014 11:32 AM
We all know many politicians lie and play games with the truth. But when supporters of an American politician find it necessary to set up an elaborate website devoted to “correcting the record” on that politician’s statements and actions, we’re talking about a champion prevaricator. That is, we’re talking about a Clinton.
This site, CorrectRecord.org, is a slick operation run by American Bridge 21st Century, a group founded by David Brock that conducts opposition research for Democratic candidates. The site is aimed at promoting Hillary Clinton’s possible presidential run and particularly geared to defend her against the many growing controversies stemming from her tenure as secretary of state, especially how she handled the 2012 terrorist attacks on the U.S. diplomatic facility in Benghazi.
One of these controversies is whether Secretary Clinton and her staff engaged in a cover-up of the Obama administration’s statements and policies related to the Benghazi terrorist attacks. New life was breathed into this issue this week due to a report by journalist Sharyl Attkisson that Clinton confidants were part of an operation to “separate” damaging documents before they were turned over to a State Department Accountability Review Board formed to investigate the Benghazi attacks.
After a quick review of the Benghazi area of the Correct the Record site, I quickly found a false statement. In a box that begins with “COVER UP FALSE,” there is this language:
The Senate Select Committee on Intelligence bipartisan report concluded there “were no efforts by the White House or any other Executive Branch entities” to cover-up facts or make alterations to talking points for political purposes. Former CIA Director David Petraeus confirmed the Benghazi talking points process was normal.
But the citation in this box is not from the bipartisan body of the January 2014 Senate Select Committee on Intelligence report on the Benghazi attacks – it’s partisan language taken from pages 4 and 5 of an appendix containing the additional views of the committee’s Democratic members.
It’s fine for Correct the Record to cite this language, but it only reflects views of the Democratic members of the committee. Republican members held very different views.
In fact, six of the committee’s seven Republican members were harshly critical of the Obama administration’s truthfulness about the Benghazi attacks and said the following in their own additional views to the report:
Rather than provide Congress with the best intelligence and on-the-ground assessments, the Administration chose to try to frame the story in a way that minimized any connection to terrorism. Before the Benghazi attacks—in the lead-up to the 2012 presidential election, the administration continued to script the narrative that al-Qaeda had been decimated and on the run. The Benghazi terrorist attacks inconveniently, and overwhelmingly, interfered with this fictitious and false narrative.
The additional views by the six Republicans also rejected the charge that the CIA was at fault for erroneous language in the Benghazi talking points, noting that e-mails reluctantly released to the committee clearly show the White House was asked to coordinate on the talking points from the earliest moments and had the final say in approving them. The six Republican members noted that this does not comport with what Acting CIA Director Morell told the intelligence committees in November 2012.
. . . in spite of his [CIA Director Petraeus] own misgivings, the final content of the talking points was the ‘[National Security Staff’s] call, to be sure.’ In contrast, the Acting Director’s testimony perpetuated the myth that the White House played no part in the drafting or editing of the talking points.
So a pro-Clinton group is trying to discredit allegations that Hillary Clinton was involved in a cover-up of how the Obama administration handled the terrorist attacks on the Benghazi consulate by falsely claiming a bipartisan Senate report exonerates her.
How Clintonian.
— Fred Fleitz is a former CIA analyst and senior staff member with the House Intelligence Committee. He is currently a senior fellow with the Center for Security Policy and chief analyst with LIGNET.com.
U
unregistered
Guest
U
unregistered
Guest
M
miles
Guest
Sounds just like The Fraud.
LadyFunkenstein
Photoshopped
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2005
- Posts
- 33,342
She isn't going to win. I am a staunch Democrat and will vote for any Republican over her.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
something to consider
and Im sure it wont be TALKED about cause
it will be called SEXIST
despite what CUNT CLINTON and IDIOT Kerry say, the greatest issue ISNT GLOWBULL WARMING
the biggest issue is ISLAMIC TERROR.....and a woman will never ever be feared nor respected by ISLAMIC TERRORISTS.....and it would be a catastrophe to have CUNT CLINTON in power.....she is no Maggie T!
and Im sure it wont be TALKED about cause
it will be called SEXIST
despite what CUNT CLINTON and IDIOT Kerry say, the greatest issue ISNT GLOWBULL WARMING
the biggest issue is ISLAMIC TERROR.....and a woman will never ever be feared nor respected by ISLAMIC TERRORISTS.....and it would be a catastrophe to have CUNT CLINTON in power.....she is no Maggie T!
LadyFunkenstein
Photoshopped
- Joined
- Jun 29, 2005
- Posts
- 33,342
she will
she is worse then HUSSEIN oh!bama
I bet you one dollar that I am right!
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
U
unregistered
Guest
4est_4est_Gump
Run Forrest! RUN!
- Joined
- Sep 19, 2011
- Posts
- 89,007
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
Playing the CUNT CARD already
Well, we are PISSED that as SoS you didn't do anything for weemen worldwide, so STFU
Hillary Clinton At Feminist Conference Says She’s “Embarrassed” By America For Not Signing Radical UN Treaty…
Hillary Rodham Clinton
The feeling is mutual, Pant Suits.
Via Breitbart:
Last Friday, to a packed hall at the modernist Ford Foundation building not far from the UN, former Sec. of State and presumptive presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she was embarrassed that the United States has never ratified the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. “It’s embarrassing. I mean, really, it’s embarrassing,” she said.
Clinton was speaking to a conference called “Women and Girls Rising” that was a look back at rosier days for the feminist agenda during the mid-90s and the great global UN conferences at Cairo on population and Beijing on the rights of women. Long-time Clinton adviser John Podesta also spoke and he, too, complained, “…many think the U.S. can’t ratify anything these days.”
There are a whole host of UN treaties most of the world has ratified that have either never been signed by the president or never given consent by the Senate, including the women’s rights treaty, but also one on children’s rights, and a more recent treaty on persons with disabilities.
Well, we are PISSED that as SoS you didn't do anything for weemen worldwide, so STFU
Hillary Clinton At Feminist Conference Says She’s “Embarrassed” By America For Not Signing Radical UN Treaty…
Hillary Rodham Clinton
The feeling is mutual, Pant Suits.
Via Breitbart:
Last Friday, to a packed hall at the modernist Ford Foundation building not far from the UN, former Sec. of State and presumptive presidential candidate Hillary Clinton said she was embarrassed that the United States has never ratified the UN Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Discrimination Against Women. “It’s embarrassing. I mean, really, it’s embarrassing,” she said.
Clinton was speaking to a conference called “Women and Girls Rising” that was a look back at rosier days for the feminist agenda during the mid-90s and the great global UN conferences at Cairo on population and Beijing on the rights of women. Long-time Clinton adviser John Podesta also spoke and he, too, complained, “…many think the U.S. can’t ratify anything these days.”
There are a whole host of UN treaties most of the world has ratified that have either never been signed by the president or never given consent by the Senate, including the women’s rights treaty, but also one on children’s rights, and a more recent treaty on persons with disabilities.
Busybody
We are ALL BUSYBODY!
- Joined
- Jan 23, 2011
- Posts
- 55,323
HUSSEIN oh!bama played the RACE card well
CUNT CLINTON will play the CUNT CARD and AGEIST and SEXIST card well
Is this the treaty that outlawed FGM, burkas, and demanded the right of all woman to vote, and drive a car?
I haven't heard her say a peep about the women and children used as slaves by ISIS.
CUNT CLINTON will play the CUNT CARD and AGEIST and SEXIST card well
Is this the treaty that outlawed FGM, burkas, and demanded the right of all woman to vote, and drive a car?
I haven't heard her say a peep about the women and children used as slaves by ISIS.
