The Final Six

[zipman]

Oh, double the h8!

LOL, what hate oh paranoid one?

I simply asked a question in a nice manner that wasn't even directed at you.

Psst - your victimhood is showing.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Dedicated h8!

 

[zipman]

Dedicated h8!

Hypocritical namecaller.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

The Rich have decided to buy a team...

The [Clinton] foundation raised more in 2015’s first three quarters than it did during the comparable period in 2014 and had more donors, the group announced.



I guess that would be the Wellesley Globe Trotters...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I love the smell of outrageous H8 in the morning...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Magic H8 Ball™ sez Idoit Liberals.

 

[RobDownSouth]

The Rich have decided to buy a team...

The [Clinton] foundation raised more in 2015’s first three quarters than it did during the comparable period in 2014 and had more donors, the group announced.



I guess that would be the Wellesley Globe Trotters...

^^^Classic glibertarian wealth envy
*nods*

Don't worry though, your backup bro kbate has your back, at least until your off-board bro gets back from Walmart.

http://i1239.photobucket.com/albums/ff502/Soonyigump/kbate_gump_zpsf0d58444.jpg

 

[zipman]

I love the smell of outrageous H8 in the morning...

Umm, you can't smell through the internet.

That's your own stench you're smelling.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

"... Fundraising disclosures released this month and in July reveal that lobbyists for media companies are raising big money for establishment presidential candidates, particularly Hillary Clinton.

"The giant media companies that shape much of the coverage of the presidential campaign have a vested stake in the outcome. From campaign finance laws that govern how money is spent on advertising to the regulators who oversee consolidation rules, the media industry has a distinct policy agenda, and with it, a political team to influence the result."

Looks like the NCAA(P) has new management...


If The Donald was not in the race, he'd be betting on her with the FOundation bookies too!


https://theintercept.com/2015/10/29/media-fundraisers-presidential/

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I think the Clinton H8leaders are here...



They look so cute in those short skirts and pom-poms and Throb has a good-sized rack!

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

USA Today puts it as:

Kentucky, North Carolina, Maryland, Duke, Kansas, and Virginia

 

[OjosMojo]

It is irrelevant. Just look at or LitoCrats and see how they've already whitewashed the Hillary Clinton into a holy crusader for social justice.

They don't care what she's done that's illegal and will deny it to the end.

She is the ONE.

Just as Barack Obama was to be the First Black President of the United States,
So shall Hillary Clinton be elected the First Woman President of the United States.

And 16 years after George W. Bush has left office, he will still be blamed for every problem (sort of the same way that Republicans still blame Bill Clinton for everything wrong and credit Ronald Reagan with everything good).

It is already written. It was written when Benghazi made no difference and the IRS didn't act as a democratic party weapon and storing secrets on a personal email server became a Republican attack.

This presidential election goes to Hillary Clinton, 51% to 49% in popular vote, with the republican taking only, South Carolina, Georgia, Mississippi, Alabama, Tennessee, Texas, Alaska and Montana, an electoral landslide.

Nice reading you without the sexist/queer chip on your shoulder.

 

[DSpeeGal]

Nice reading you without the sexist/queer chip on your shoulder.

"she" used a ghostwriter

 

[DSpeeGal]

 

[kbate]

I'm curious, who do you like?

The only person who ran who was worthy of my vote was Jim Webb, and he had no chance because the democratic debate was designed to anoint Hillary and kill the rest of them off. Sanders practically handed the nomination to Hillary at the debate by excusing all of he shady behaviour.

I wouldn't vote for Hillary even if her opponent was Adolf Hitler. Not a single one of the republican candidates holds any interest, bad ideas on parade.

So, I will be voting for either a libertarian candidate or simply not voting.

 

[kbate]

Nice reading you without the sexist/queer chip on your shoulder.

You are a moron and sadly for you, I feel that I'm being unkind to generic morons by lumping you in with them.

 

[zipman]

The only person who ran who was worthy of my vote was Jim Webb, and he had no chance because the democratic debate was designed to anoint Hillary and kill the rest of them off. Sanders practically handed the nomination to Hillary at the debate by excusing all of he shady behaviour.

I wouldn't vote for Hillary even if her opponent was Adolf Hitler. Not a single one of the republican candidates holds any interest, bad ideas on parade.

So, I will be voting for either a libertarian candidate or simply not voting.

Thanks for answering.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

The only person who ran who was worthy of my vote was Jim Webb, and he had no chance because the democratic debate was designed to anoint Hillary and kill the rest of them off. Sanders practically handed the nomination to Hillary at the debate by excusing all of he shady behaviour.

I wouldn't vote for Hillary even if her opponent was Adolf Hitler. Not a single one of the republican candidates holds any interest, bad ideas on parade.

So, I will be voting for either a libertarian candidate or simply not voting.

Your sentiments expose Hillary's peril: Folks staying home. She's not popular with most Democrats, especially the Left and Blacks.

You aint gonna get a Libertarian. Aint gonna happen. I think the GOP is so divided Trump wont cinch the nomination, and Wall Street will buy the delegates Bush needs to win.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Republicans stay home; individual choice.



Democrats turn out because it is a Mass Movement (Eric Hoffer). The True Believer supports his religion with participation and that gives him the validity and stature that his own miserable life does not afford him. No matter how much they detest her, she will get her turnout; it is a religious duty.

 

[DSpeeGal]

The only person who ran who was worthy of my vote was Jim Webb, and he had no chance because the democratic debate was designed to anoint Hillary and kill the rest of them off. Sanders practically handed the nomination to Hillary at the debate by excusing all of he shady behaviour.

I wouldn't vote for Hillary even if her opponent was Adolf Hitler. Not a single one of the republican candidates holds any interest, bad ideas on parade.

So, I will be voting for either a libertarian candidate or simply not voting.

I agree re Webb

I disagree with your take on Repoz

 

[Ishmael]

I wonder how many people are picking up on what's going on?

The tests are as follows;

Hillary has the democrat nomination baring any action by the FBI. And any lack of action by the FBI will prove that the upper echelons of that particular organization have been politically corrupted. If she is charged, as she should be, and then absolved by the administration her political career is over. So are her chances of being elected.

On the Republican side, if you're an insider, you're out. At least for the time being. (A year is a lifetime in politics.) Trump and Carson have captured the imagination and enthusiasm of the base. But neither Cruz nor Rubio can be counted out yet. Carly is hanging tough and is a viable VP candidate. Should Trump win the nomination it's going to be interesting to see his VP selection. A black, a Latino, or a woman?

I'm enjoying the whole process so far.

Ishmael

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I can hear Russell Crowe shouting at the mob, "Are you not entertained?"

 

[DSpeeGal]

DOJ and FBI are totally corrupt

They will do nothing

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Hillary and Obama are locked in a MAD scenario.

Neither one can tell the truth without taking down the other because it is a conspiracy.

 

[Mike712]

Forget the "final four", this is a two-man contest between Rubio and Cruz.

If the establishment Republicans prevail, Rubio gets the nod.
If the bomb-throwing nihilistic whackadoodle Republicans prevail, it will be Cruz.

Either candidate will get annihilated by Hillary Clinton in the general election.

Statistically speaking, it is very unlikely that the eventual Republican nominee will get "annihilated." Based on historical election data, candidates from the same party as the sitting president are three times less likely to win the presidential election (http://fortune.com/2015/10/15/computer-white-house-winner/). This effect is especially pronounced when the sitting president is at the end of his second term. Another reason that the Republican nominee won't get annihilated is that many of the Republican nominees are minorities. Cruz and Rubio are Hispanic, and Carson is black. If any of these candidates were to win the party's nomination, they would surely win votes from the minority voting block in the general election. These minorities normally vote Democratic, so the loss of their support would seriously hurt a Democrat's chance at winning the White House.
This also brings up an important point. Many liberals like to automatically designate Republicans as racists and bigots. In addition to the fact that Cruz and Rubio are Hispanics that have considerable support from the Republicans, the fact that the leading candidate in Iowa, Carson, is black, disproves this. Also, Fiorina is enjoying moderate success, which throws out the assertion that Republicans are misogynistic and would never vote for women. Ironically, while liberals complain about generalizations and stereotypes, it is often they who are guilty of them.
I hope that an establishment candidate prevails for the Republicans, because they are the more moderate, credible candidates (no offense to Carson, but he has no business as a neurosurgeon being in this race).
Also, many people love Bernie Sanders proposals, but he only makes his ridiculous statements because he knows he won't win. For example, he says he will make public colleges free, which besides being a bad thing for private schools and thus bad for our country, is completely unattainable. Proposals like this are impossible to achieve, but Sanders says them because he know he won't win and therefore will not have to stay true to his promises. Clinton on the other hand would be held accountable for what she says if she were to win, so she is more realistic and moderate in her promises.