The Dating Sim Game

[Primalex]

Welcome to the first Literotican Dating Sim Game!

The rules are simple:

You message me a question about yourself and three possible answers. If I get enough answers right, the heart icons above your head (only I can see) will increase and you will reward me. When there are sufficient heart icons, you will become my girlfriend and the rewards become even more daring. I can boost the heart icons by purchasing gifts, but need to balance my weekly income with sleep and food. If I run out of money or food, I lose. If I say something incredibly stupid or offensive, you will be angry and I have to wait a day for another try.

 

[gretchenmilliner]

Do I exist in a superposition of manifolds where overall all possibilities occur?

1) Shut up philosophising and get your knickers down slut!
2) Maybe.
3) That's not fair it's a trick question.

 

[Primalex]

Do I exist in a superposition of manifolds where overall all possibilities occur?

1) Shut up philosophising and get your knickers down slut!
2) Maybe.
3) That's not fair it's a trick question.

My real answer would be:
4) Yes, but nobody would know because you can only exist there while your photons are unobserved. But you didn't offer the correct answer. So let me think.


I don't think you like 2) as answer. Who wants to date a guy who is like "Well, maybe, who knows? It could be this or that or anything in between, I'm not sure and I don't have an opinion about anything that is more complex than steaks and blowjobs."?

3) is a bad choice, too. Even if it's a trick question, who wants to date someone who spoils the fun and whines about life being unfair? Life is not always fair. I believe in trying to do the best with whatever life deals to you. Shitty cards mean you have to up your ante, not whine.

Therefore - I will pick 1).
a) It's a complete sentence.
b) You are from the UK. Any answer containing the word "knickers" must give additional points.

 

[Apple_of_Eden]

I am posting on your thread primarily because I enjoyed reading and was intrigued by your:

a) Biography
b) Thread post and unique premise
c) The way you answered the previous post

 

[Primalex]

I am posting on your thread primarily because I enjoyed reading and was intrigued by your:

a) Biography
b) Thread post and unique premise
c) The way you answered the previous post

That's a tough one.

I've been around here quite some time with more interesting biographies in my profile, so I rule a) out.

You must have read the thread title and it made you click on it. So it is at least partially true. If you would have hated reading the previous answer, the premise wouldn't have convinced you to reply though. So the answer was either the deciding element or you hope for a better answer.

Hm. No, you are not the kind of girl sitting in a corner hoping for something good; at least not in the virtual world.

Therefore my answer is: c)