The Dark Web

I imagine that it would be interesting and repulsing from a sociological perspective, but I'm just too lazy to bother. I don't think I'll be getting much further than the dimly lit web.
 
If you venture too deep into the dark web without using a complex proxy/vpn setup, then you can be sure to expect a very unfriendly visit by federal agents.
 
I imagine that it would be interesting and repulsing from a sociological perspective, but I'm just too lazy to bother. I don't think I'll be getting much further than the dimly lit web.

It's not like you can't bump up against the unseemly side of life on Literotica prior to an impending ban.
 
If you are truly intent on visiting the deep web, then you have to use the TOR browser.

I've never been there myself, but I've heard horror stories about it.

But do remember my warnings about that place, and don't blame anyone else if you get HORRIBLE viruses/malware or even a visit from FBI agents as a result.

The cybercrime division of the FBI frequently hacks the deep/dark web trying to track down people who run illegal websites on it.

These websites are dedicated to the following.

*Child pornography/pedophilia
*Snuff films
*Drug trafficking
*Human trafficking
*Arms trafficking
*Narcotics sales
*Black market
*Terrorism
*Black hat computer hacking
*Organized crime and terrorist recruitment
*Contract murder

And much, MUCH worse!!
 
Last edited:
Agreed, Mike. I only use it to offer my termination services; problem solving with extreme prejudice.

I would never use it for things that are much, much worse.
 
The *******s & cheap generic prescription meds from Canuckistan.

One of the things they have in common is the peeps that talk the most about them on this forum not only have never used them, they have ZERO clue about how they work, how to access them, or what's available.


P.S. neither are scary. But both have the ability to utterly fuck you up. Caveat emptor.
 
Another perfect, GB wannabe thread:

Massive participatory pontification...

...without any actual knowledge.
 
Another perfect, GB wannabe thread:

Massive participatory pontification...

...without any actual knowledge.

Fata asked a question about the Dark Web admittingly knowing she didn't know much about it. You righties really need to think before typing.
 
Don't forget sex trafficking....of minors.

A friend went on there once to show me. I happened to notice how easily he navigated it and what the first things were he wanted to show me.

I walked out and have never spoken to him since.

I don't get it.

I heard that this sort of stuff is semi-available online.

But why are they allowing it to stay on the worldwide web in the first place?
Surely with such modern online spying abilities that they have (see NSA) , they could take them down asap.
Or maybe they're leaving them online for a while on purpose, in order to catch the entire web of sex trafficking.


Now I'm not trying to push boundaries re Laurel's rule, so I'm hoping for either a general answer re sex trafficking overall (not related to an age group) or ignore.
 
Fata asked a question about the Dark Web admittingly knowing she didn't know much about it. You righties really need to think before typing.

That will NEVAR be the case so long as my dimunitive beta male bitch Queerbait draws breath. He absolutey, positively has to respond within 30 seconds. Type first, Edit later, Think last.

It's all about teh Post Count.
 
That will NEVAR be the case so long as my dimunitive beta male bitch Queerbait draws breath. He absolutey, positively has to respond within 30 seconds. Type first, Edit later, Think last.

It's all about teh Post Count.

WTF?

"Type first, Edit later, Think last."

Yep, bad idea
 
I kind of wonder if we all know the name of the "dark web" if it doesn't have a new name we don't know.

Maybe the Earl Spot?
 
Back
Top