The crazed leftists want gun control and I bet this will cause the crazed leftists to go batshit crazy

[1984X2024]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1963632923724189828

 

[ll74]

So second amendment absolutists are cool with it then?

 

[Rightguide]

So second amendment absolutists are cool with it then?

Nobody I know has ever been cool with the insane having access to dangerous weapons. Question 11F on the 4473 Form addresses mental health and asks if one has been "adjudicated as a mental defective" or "been committed to a mental institution." So, it's plausible that Congress could dream up another category that implicates one's 2A rights, but would it be legal?

 

[ll74]

Nobody I know has ever been cool with the insane having access to dangerous weapons. Question 11F on the 4473 Form addresses mental health and asks if one has been "adjudicated as a mental defective" or "been committed to a mental institution." So, it's plausible that Congress could dream up another category that implicates one's 2A rights, but would it be legal?

So you're fine with guns being taken away from Americans.

Thanks for confirming.

 

[schism666]

Nobody I know has ever been cool with the insane having access to dangerous weapons. Question 11F on the 4473 Form addresses mental health and asks if one has been "adjudicated as a mental defective" or "been committed to a mental institution." So, it's plausible that Congress could dream up another category that implicates one's 2A rights, but would it be legal?

you're a poop fetishist with identity confusion, vetteman. no one here is more insane than you.

 

[Rebel5soul]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1963632923724189828

I will not support that.

 

[Rightguide]

So you're fine with guns being taken away from Americans.

Thanks for confirming.

Guns have always been prohibited to "some" Americans.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

Yes, those being shot at.
And everyone else with a functional brain.

 

[ll74]

Guns have always been prohibited to "some" Americans.

So you are fine with Americans having their guns taken away.

Thanks for confirming again.

 

[Wat_Tyler]

It’s a long road from “considering” to “enacted”

 

[Rightguide]

So you are fine with Americans having their guns taken away.

Thanks for confirming again.

Felons and crazy people have been prohibited from owning firearms since 1938.

 

[ll74]

Felons and crazy people have been prohibited from owning firearms since 1938.

And you support Americans having their guns taken away.

Go ahead and just say the words....quit discussing what the law says and just say that you agree with the law.

 

[1984X2024]

as I said

all want gun control

BUT

not gun control for crazed trannies

 

[ll74]

as I said

all want gun control

BUT

not gun control for crazed trannies

You want Americans to have their guns taken away.

 

[schism666]

as I said

all want gun control

BUT

not gun control for crazed trannies

are pervs who beg trannies for jerk material crazy?

 

[Meekly_Anna]

as I said

all want gun control

BUT

not gun control for crazed trannies

Listen here, pal, let's get one thing straight. The whole idea that transgender folk are somehow 'mentally ill' is pure nonsense, a load o' rubbish. Being transgender is about a person's gender identity—who they know themselves to be deep down inside—not lining up with the sex they were assigned at birth. It's a fundamental part of their being, no different than havin' blue eyes or a loud laugh. It's got nothing to do with their mental state.
Now, when you talk about rights, it's pretty simple, really. Every human being, no matter who they are, deserves the same dignity, respect, and rights as anyone else. This is all about equality. We're all built of the same stuff, we all breathe the same air, and we all deserve the chance to live our lives free from fear and discrimination. Denyin' rights to a person just because they're transgender is like sayin' someone doesn't deserve a job 'cause they've got freckles. It's daft and it's just plain wrong.
So, in short, transgender folk are mentally sound, their gender identity is a natural part of who they are, and they deserve the exact same rights as everybody else. It’s no' up for debate.

 

[ChloeTzang]

https://twitter.com/x/status/1963632923724189828

Absolutely not. Involuntary committal and treatment.

 

[Rightguide]

Listen here, pal, let's get one thing straight. The whole idea that transgender folk are somehow 'mentally ill' is pure nonsense, a load o' rubbish. Being transgender is about a person's gender identity—who they know themselves to be deep down inside—not lining up with the sex they were assigned at birth. It's a fundamental part of their being, no different than havin' blue eyes or a loud laugh. It's got nothing to do with their mental state.
Now, when you talk about rights, it's pretty simple, really. Every human being, no matter who they are, deserves the same dignity, respect, and rights as anyone else. This is all about equality. We're all built of the same stuff, we all breathe the same air, and we all deserve the chance to live our lives free from fear and discrimination. Denyin' rights to a person just because they're transgender is like sayin' someone doesn't deserve a job 'cause they've got freckles. It's daft and it's just plain wrong.
So, in short, transgender folk are mentally sound, their gender identity is a natural part of who they are, and they deserve the exact same rights as everybody else. It’s no' up for debate.

I agree fully that transgender people deserve respect and equal rights, but it’s intellectually lazy to pretend the subject is as simple as ‘freckles.’ The interactions between gender identity, mental health, medical care, and legal frameworks are complex. Ignoring that nuance doesn’t advance equality, it risks policies that fail the very people you claim to defend. In addition, a child is too young to give informed consent for life-altering medical decisions. It should be illegal for a parent to make permanent choices, such as transitioning a child, that could override the child’s future autonomy, effectively denying him the right to make his own informed decisions as an adult. Respecting a child’s rights means protecting their ability to choose for themselves when they are capable of understanding the consequences, as opposed to a mother's selfish notions that her son might look cute wearing a dress with his fingernails painted.

 

[Meekly_Anna]

I agree fully that transgender people deserve respect and equal rights, but it’s intellectually lazy to pretend the subject is as simple as ‘freckles.’ The interactions between gender identity, mental health, medical care, and legal frameworks are complex. Ignoring that nuance doesn’t advance equality, it risks policies that fail the very people you claim to defend. In addition, a child is too young to give informed consent for life-altering medical decisions. It should be illegal for a parent to make permanent choices, such as transitioning a child, that could override the child’s future autonomy, effectively denying him the right to make his own informed decisions as an adult. Respecting a child’s rights means protecting their ability to choose for themselves when they are capable of understanding the consequences, as opposed to a mother's selfish notions that her son might look cute wearing a dress with his fingernails painted.

You reduce a woman to a person with painted fingernails?
Are you accusing parents of being careless with their children's basic needs?
I will not write "interesting" because it's not my style and someone else's trademark.
I question the right to own a gun. No one needs that. The monopoly on the use of force lies with the state.

 

[Hel_Books]

You Americans are just weird. You're sending your kids to school with bullet-proof backpacks and watching news about mass shootings happening at the rate of more than one PER DAY and somehow can't see why every other country on the planet (except for failed states like Syria) doesn't suffer the same carnage!

 

[Meekly_Anna]

And just for the fun of it, I admit I started writing it before I posted above.

There's a guid few reasons why ye can't just hand a firearm tae any auld body that fancies one, and it all boils down to plain common sense and keeping folks safe.

A wee bit o' common sense, something you terribly lack.
First off, a firearm isn't a toy. It's a machine designed to fire a projectile at high speed. In the wrang hands, it can cause massive harm. We're talkin' life-changing injuries or worse. Giving someone a weapon without checking if they're sound in the head, or if they ken how to use it properly, is just asking for a disaster. Think o' it this way: ye wouldn't let a bairn drive a lorry, would ye? It's the same principle, but with much higher stakes.

Secondly, and this is a big one, ye cannae just pick up a gun and become a marksman. Folk need proper training. They need tae learn about gun safety, how to store the thing so it doesnae fall intae the wrang hands, and how tae handle it on a range. They need tae ken the difference between a loaded and an unloaded weapon and understand the rules of engagement. Without that training, a gun is a liability, not a tool. Ye could end up hurting yerself or, God forbid, someone else.

Lastly, there's the whole mental and physical health aspect. Owning a firearm is a massive responsibility. Authorities need to check that a person is mentally stable and not prone to angry outbursts or unpredictable behaviour. It’s also important tae make sure they're physically capable of handling a weapon safely. This isn't about judging folk, mind you, it's about making sure the whole community is protected. A weapon in the hands of someone who's a bit unwell or unstable is a recipe for tragedy.
So, in short, it's a matter of safety, responsibility, and ensuring that those who have the right tae own a firearm are capable and trustworthy. It's a daft idea tae just hand 'em out without a wee bit of scrutiny. We're no' daft here, are we?

Translation into less proper English:
If you demand to own a gun or insist that you have the right to own one, you are a nutter. And a nutter should never have a gun.

 

[ChloeTzang]

You Americans are just weird. You're sending your kids to school with bullet-proof backpacks and watching news about mass shootings happening at the rate of more than one PER DAY and somehow can't see why every other country on the planet (except for failed states like Syria) doesn't suffer the same carnage!

Totally agree. We should be giving all our kids guns to carry to school too like we did in the old days. The resulting carnage will weed out the criminals and the bad shots, the gene pool will improve and society will be the better for it.

 

[ChloeTzang]

And just for the fun of it, I admit I started writing it before I posted above.

There's a guid few reasons why ye can't just hand a firearm tae any auld body that fancies one, and it all boils down to plain common sense and keeping folks safe.

A wee bit o' common sense, something you terribly lack.
First off, a firearm isn't a toy. It's a machine designed to fire a projectile at high speed. In the wrang hands, it can cause massive harm. We're talkin' life-changing injuries or worse. Giving someone a weapon without checking if they're sound in the head, or if they ken how to use it properly, is just asking for a disaster. Think o' it this way: ye wouldn't let a bairn drive a lorry, would ye? It's the same principle, but with much higher stakes.

Secondly, and this is a big one, ye cannae just pick up a gun and become a marksman. Folk need proper training. They need tae learn about gun safety, how to store the thing so it doesnae fall intae the wrang hands, and how tae handle it on a range. They need tae ken the difference between a loaded and an unloaded weapon and understand the rules of engagement. Without that training, a gun is a liability, not a tool. Ye could end up hurting yerself or, God forbid, someone else.

Lastly, there's the whole mental and physical health aspect. Owning a firearm is a massive responsibility. Authorities need to check that a person is mentally stable and not prone to angry outbursts or unpredictable behaviour. It’s also important tae make sure they're physically capable of handling a weapon safely. This isn't about judging folk, mind you, it's about making sure the whole community is protected. A weapon in the hands of someone who's a bit unwell or unstable is a recipe for tragedy.
So, in short, it's a matter of safety, responsibility, and ensuring that those who have the right tae own a firearm are capable and trustworthy. It's a daft idea tae just hand 'em out without a wee bit of scrutiny. We're no' daft here, a
re we?

Translation into less proper English:
If you demand to own a gun or insist that you have the right to own one, you are a nutter. And a nutter should never have a gun.

The 2nd Amendment is NOT intended to keep people safe. It's intended to make people feel decidely UNSAFE, particulary if they annoy enough people.

Unlike you Brits, we can resolve issues with our government. Largely by shooting them if we really really want to. YOU slaves can keep your opinions on guns to yourselves - your govenment has already taken all yours away and now you can be locked up for mean tweets and jokes that are not approved. So sad, too bad.

The end result is the UK will have a civil war that will make Yugoslavia look like a teddy bears picnic. Enjoy it.

We on the other hand will settle our differences the way we usually do, by yelling and screaming and using deleted epithets on each other, rigging and rerigging elections, gerrymandering until we get the desired outcomes and generally fucking each other off by playing by the more or less rules because we have more guns here than the rst of the world combined and we know what will happen if we REALLY piss each other off. LOL. I'd rather have a few school shootings than experience what you Brits are going to experience.

Good luck and don't be too meek. Because the meek don't inherit the earth.

They get raped, massacred and turned into Muslims.

But you guys voted for that and the only way you'll be able to undo it now is with....guns. Lots and lots of guns.

 

[HisArpy]

Good luck and don't be too meek. Because the meek don't inherit the earth.

They get raped, massacred and turned into Muslim EUNUCHs.

All fixed.

 

[Hel_Books]

Hel_Books said:
You Americans are just weird. You're sending your kids to school with bullet-proof backpacks and watching news about mass shootings happening at the rate of more than one PER DAY and somehow can't see why every other country on the planet (except for failed states like Syria) doesn't suffer the same carnage!

Totally agree. We should be giving all our kids guns to carry to school too like we did in the old days. The resulting carnage will weed out the criminals and the bad shots, the gene pool will improve and society will be the better for it.

Just like it is in Syria?