scbolder
Experienced
- Joined
- May 10, 2020
- Posts
- 43
If you don't want to read another post about AI rejection then move on. However, I think this adds to the conversation based on everything I have read on here. Warning, it is quite long when you include the four versions of my story intro (explained below).
I know many are dismissive about the importance of having conversations with people who have been rejected for using AI. Getting a story blocked from publishing on Lit might not be a huge deal, but as this article (https://www.fastcompany.com/91074029/can-using-grammarly-set-off-ai-detection-software_) shows, there are real consequences for getting it wrong.
I have my personal story (below), but at the very least, I think Literotica needs a clear and straightforward AI policy. If using Grammarly or others to edit spelling and grammar will trigger the AI detection, SAY THAT, don't pretend that it is okay, and then accuse writers of largely composing their stories using AI.
I cannot speak for anyone but myself, and I know many will not believe what I say here or find reasons to pick at my story, but I think it is important to share how I found myself getting rejected for "using" AI.
I started publishing on Lit in 2020 and have been reading stories here for almost as long as it has existed. My first stories were rough, with me struggling to self-edit (as many do). I quickly sought out volunteer editors, but after using four of them, long waits, ghosting, and unsatisfactory results discouraged me from continuing to use VE's. I turned to Grammarly, which, at the time, no one seemed to have any issue with on Lit.
Was it perfect? Of course not, but I was happier with the results of my work when I used it. I re-edited many of my stories using it and published an unfinished nine-part series under a different pen name using it and several stories under this one. I was happy, my readers seemed happy, and there were no problems getting anything published when I stopped publishing on Lit in late 2022. I recently returned to Lit and published two stories with no issues using the same editing process.
To be clear, my use of Grammarly has not changed over the years. I tend to write my first draft in Pages with spelling and grammar check turned off. I write faster this way and can get into a good flow. However, I make a lot of typos, misuse homophones, leave out entire words, and my comma usage becomes erratic at best. Needless to say, it is not publishable at this point.
I then turn on the crappy spelling and grammar check in Pages and do a read-through, correcting what I see and what is marked (that I agree with) by the program. This draft is usually better, but only slightly, because I truly do suck at proofreading my own work without it being pointed out.
My next step is to load it into the free web version of Grammarly and correct or ignore everything with a red underline. I will then give a final read-through, taking note of the yellow "premium suggestions" as areas to focus on. Now, for those that don't know, these are only marked on the free version, and there are no suggestions for fixing the issue, only that there might be an issue. What this does for me is let me focus on those spots for further examination and determine if I want to change them myself. For me, most of these are a result of passive voice or comma usage. I fix the ones I want and leave the others.
This is usually when I am happy enough to publish. At most, I will give another read-through to make sure.
Please note, that at no point in the process have I selected the "Generative AI" function or used any suggestions from Grammarly other than things like "peek not peak," "self-edit not self-edit," "inset comma," "remove comma," and run of the mill spelling that slipped through Pages inadequate spell check.
So, it is no surprise that I am confused when I see this message in my rejected story:
"Are you using Grammarly, ProWritingAid, Quillbot or similar software? Many modern writing packages incorporate AI. If you are using a grammar check program sparingly (as a spellcheck, to fix punctuation, review grammar, and/or occasionally as a thesaurus), that should be fine. If you are allowing a grammar check program to “rewrite” your words, that may cross the line into AI generated text/stories. Please see this FAQ for more information: https://literotica.com/faq/publishing/publishing-ai"
I read through the FAQ and came to the conclusion that I am not violating the AI terms. Especially since I have not changed my editing habits since before Grammarly introduced the new "AI" features. I promptly read through my story to see if anything stood out and resubmitted it with a few edits and a note:
"I am resubmitting this story because it was rejected for suspected use of AI. I have made some minor edits, as I decided to reread to see if anything stood out, but I can assure you that while I use the free version of Grammarly for spelling, punctuation, and other grammatical issues, I do not and have never used the generative AI function to create text for me. I have had the same editing process since at least my Late Night Truth or Dare series, including my two recent submissions. Thank you."
I should also point out that the story that was rejected, was the first part of the series I had previously published in 2022 under a different pen name and since removed.
I had two more stories in the queue, both of which were also rejected, as well as my resubmission of the first rejection, this time with a comment in response to my note of:
"Hello! We appreciate the effort you put into your work. In recent months, Grammarly has added generative AI to its product - so while previous works may have been not affected, any works you processed through Grammarly post-AI may introduce generative AI with its rephrasing features. We've checked this work several times and it is still coming back as being composed largely of AI-generated prose. Please see this FAQ for more information: https://literotica.com/faq/publishing/publishing-ai"
This is when I became angry. Not only were my assertions being dismissed, it was being blatantly stated that my work was "composed largely of AI-generated prose," by the AI that is reviewing for AI. I could understand if Literotica is taking a zero-tolerance approach and blocking anything that passed through Grammarly (which they are not saying), but to accuse me of using work generated by an AI, not just edited, makes me feel like I am being dismissed and tossed aside without being heard. I write my own stories.
It should be noted that a week prior to this second rejection of my story, I messaged @Laurel explaining my situation and providing the first 2500 characters of my new story in three different edits. I hadn't edited it before getting the rejection and reaching out allowing me to do this (I have deleted the first drafts of my other stories).
For those of you who doubt my story or think it is a matter of my "style." Please, read the four versions (I added one more than I sent to Laurel) of my intro below (unedited, edited in Pages, Only the red underlines in Grammarly, final Grammarly edit as described above). I know I am no great author, but I hope you can see that this can't be AI, if only because of the copious mistakes in the first draft and the lack of major changes in the last. Be honest, and think about whether this should be banned or not. I have not submitted it yet, but it is 100% representative of what I have done in writing and editing three banned stories and numerous published ones before those.
I have taken to time and risk to expose my writing process, showing the flaws of my early drafts, and if you choose to read them, I hope you take the time to think about the impact of the Literotica AI policies as they currently stand.
I have no influence on the workings of Lit, and I don't know if any of you do, but what I know is that when I read the threads about AI rejections I see many dismissive or downright mean comments towards people who are frustrated by being excluded from a system that has been so welcoming for so long. Is everyone telling the truth about their AI usage? I have no idea, but I am, and I am willing to bet most people are. There really is no reason to lie. In all honesty, there is no reason to try and publish AI-generated writing on Lit in my opinion (although I don't doubt it is being done). We are not making money and most of us simply want an audience and feedback. I am happy that people (mostly) like my stories, and I wouldn't get the same feeling if I had not written them myself.
I honestly don't know if I will respond to or even read the responses to this. I am tired, have other issues going on in my life, and just want to write as an escape. Literotica is no longer a happy place for me. I just wanted to say my piece and give the doubters of those struggling to figure out what's going on something more to think about. I think we deserve that.
For context, this is the start of Chapter 8 of a previously abandoned series of mine. The graduation being referred to is college, not high school, and of course, everyone is over eighteen, not that there is any sex in this part.
I know many are dismissive about the importance of having conversations with people who have been rejected for using AI. Getting a story blocked from publishing on Lit might not be a huge deal, but as this article (https://www.fastcompany.com/91074029/can-using-grammarly-set-off-ai-detection-software_) shows, there are real consequences for getting it wrong.
I have my personal story (below), but at the very least, I think Literotica needs a clear and straightforward AI policy. If using Grammarly or others to edit spelling and grammar will trigger the AI detection, SAY THAT, don't pretend that it is okay, and then accuse writers of largely composing their stories using AI.
I cannot speak for anyone but myself, and I know many will not believe what I say here or find reasons to pick at my story, but I think it is important to share how I found myself getting rejected for "using" AI.
I started publishing on Lit in 2020 and have been reading stories here for almost as long as it has existed. My first stories were rough, with me struggling to self-edit (as many do). I quickly sought out volunteer editors, but after using four of them, long waits, ghosting, and unsatisfactory results discouraged me from continuing to use VE's. I turned to Grammarly, which, at the time, no one seemed to have any issue with on Lit.
Was it perfect? Of course not, but I was happier with the results of my work when I used it. I re-edited many of my stories using it and published an unfinished nine-part series under a different pen name using it and several stories under this one. I was happy, my readers seemed happy, and there were no problems getting anything published when I stopped publishing on Lit in late 2022. I recently returned to Lit and published two stories with no issues using the same editing process.
To be clear, my use of Grammarly has not changed over the years. I tend to write my first draft in Pages with spelling and grammar check turned off. I write faster this way and can get into a good flow. However, I make a lot of typos, misuse homophones, leave out entire words, and my comma usage becomes erratic at best. Needless to say, it is not publishable at this point.
I then turn on the crappy spelling and grammar check in Pages and do a read-through, correcting what I see and what is marked (that I agree with) by the program. This draft is usually better, but only slightly, because I truly do suck at proofreading my own work without it being pointed out.
My next step is to load it into the free web version of Grammarly and correct or ignore everything with a red underline. I will then give a final read-through, taking note of the yellow "premium suggestions" as areas to focus on. Now, for those that don't know, these are only marked on the free version, and there are no suggestions for fixing the issue, only that there might be an issue. What this does for me is let me focus on those spots for further examination and determine if I want to change them myself. For me, most of these are a result of passive voice or comma usage. I fix the ones I want and leave the others.
This is usually when I am happy enough to publish. At most, I will give another read-through to make sure.
Please note, that at no point in the process have I selected the "Generative AI" function or used any suggestions from Grammarly other than things like "peek not peak," "self-edit not self-edit," "inset comma," "remove comma," and run of the mill spelling that slipped through Pages inadequate spell check.
So, it is no surprise that I am confused when I see this message in my rejected story:
"Are you using Grammarly, ProWritingAid, Quillbot or similar software? Many modern writing packages incorporate AI. If you are using a grammar check program sparingly (as a spellcheck, to fix punctuation, review grammar, and/or occasionally as a thesaurus), that should be fine. If you are allowing a grammar check program to “rewrite” your words, that may cross the line into AI generated text/stories. Please see this FAQ for more information: https://literotica.com/faq/publishing/publishing-ai"
I read through the FAQ and came to the conclusion that I am not violating the AI terms. Especially since I have not changed my editing habits since before Grammarly introduced the new "AI" features. I promptly read through my story to see if anything stood out and resubmitted it with a few edits and a note:
"I am resubmitting this story because it was rejected for suspected use of AI. I have made some minor edits, as I decided to reread to see if anything stood out, but I can assure you that while I use the free version of Grammarly for spelling, punctuation, and other grammatical issues, I do not and have never used the generative AI function to create text for me. I have had the same editing process since at least my Late Night Truth or Dare series, including my two recent submissions. Thank you."
I should also point out that the story that was rejected, was the first part of the series I had previously published in 2022 under a different pen name and since removed.
I had two more stories in the queue, both of which were also rejected, as well as my resubmission of the first rejection, this time with a comment in response to my note of:
"Hello! We appreciate the effort you put into your work. In recent months, Grammarly has added generative AI to its product - so while previous works may have been not affected, any works you processed through Grammarly post-AI may introduce generative AI with its rephrasing features. We've checked this work several times and it is still coming back as being composed largely of AI-generated prose. Please see this FAQ for more information: https://literotica.com/faq/publishing/publishing-ai"
This is when I became angry. Not only were my assertions being dismissed, it was being blatantly stated that my work was "composed largely of AI-generated prose," by the AI that is reviewing for AI. I could understand if Literotica is taking a zero-tolerance approach and blocking anything that passed through Grammarly (which they are not saying), but to accuse me of using work generated by an AI, not just edited, makes me feel like I am being dismissed and tossed aside without being heard. I write my own stories.
It should be noted that a week prior to this second rejection of my story, I messaged @Laurel explaining my situation and providing the first 2500 characters of my new story in three different edits. I hadn't edited it before getting the rejection and reaching out allowing me to do this (I have deleted the first drafts of my other stories).
For those of you who doubt my story or think it is a matter of my "style." Please, read the four versions (I added one more than I sent to Laurel) of my intro below (unedited, edited in Pages, Only the red underlines in Grammarly, final Grammarly edit as described above). I know I am no great author, but I hope you can see that this can't be AI, if only because of the copious mistakes in the first draft and the lack of major changes in the last. Be honest, and think about whether this should be banned or not. I have not submitted it yet, but it is 100% representative of what I have done in writing and editing three banned stories and numerous published ones before those.
I have taken to time and risk to expose my writing process, showing the flaws of my early drafts, and if you choose to read them, I hope you take the time to think about the impact of the Literotica AI policies as they currently stand.
I have no influence on the workings of Lit, and I don't know if any of you do, but what I know is that when I read the threads about AI rejections I see many dismissive or downright mean comments towards people who are frustrated by being excluded from a system that has been so welcoming for so long. Is everyone telling the truth about their AI usage? I have no idea, but I am, and I am willing to bet most people are. There really is no reason to lie. In all honesty, there is no reason to try and publish AI-generated writing on Lit in my opinion (although I don't doubt it is being done). We are not making money and most of us simply want an audience and feedback. I am happy that people (mostly) like my stories, and I wouldn't get the same feeling if I had not written them myself.
I honestly don't know if I will respond to or even read the responses to this. I am tired, have other issues going on in my life, and just want to write as an escape. Literotica is no longer a happy place for me. I just wanted to say my piece and give the doubters of those struggling to figure out what's going on something more to think about. I think we deserve that.
For context, this is the start of Chapter 8 of a previously abandoned series of mine. The graduation being referred to is college, not high school, and of course, everyone is over eighteen, not that there is any sex in this part.