The ‘Psychology’ of Liberals

[SleepingWarrior]

I think you misspelled Liars in the title of this thread Injun... Didn't need the b,e, or the last L. Also the r and a should be switched around...just thought you would like to know.

 

[weed]

OMG...I'm so confused by the stereotriping

I guess I'm not really a liberal after all.

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

Quick test: Still think we did the wrong thing by invading Iraq?

 

[weed]

Quick test: Still think we did the wrong thing by invading Iraq?

I think we did it the wrong way.

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

Is there a right way to rape someone?

 

[SleepingWarrior]

Is there a right way to rape someone?

Ask nicely first?

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

Ask after the duct tape is in place...

 

[TWB]

Actually, I think the article is a good example of how a person with an opposing viewpoint to, in this case, a liberal position, take that position and simply attach a reasoning to it that does not exist as a way of attacking the position itself.

It is baseless propoganda, and as such was quite amusing to read.

 

[weed]

Is there a right way to rape someone?

Oh, that was rape?


I guess the US was just thinking with their dicks.

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

Rape, Pillage, and Plunder!

Hey, TWB, if it were a layperson instead of a shrink writing it, you'd have a great point!

 

[Le Jacquelope]

I'm pissed they didn't have a good go at California. The Greens got more votes thatn they did. Gary Coleman got more votes than they did. The Metro-sexual Bustamante got more votes than they did. Hell, was Mickey Mouse on the ticket, because even that little fawker would have gotten more votes than my party did!

All theory, no practice!

LOL Gary Coleman whupped the Libertarians in CA. Oh that's just too funny.

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

UncleBill shouldav' run at the very least!

 

[Daedalus77]

Quote

"effectively breaking the liberal welfare system that enslaved mostly black people from their seemingly unending fates of dependency and broken families, limited education and statistically premature death"

I thought the numbers say there are more white people on welfare than blacks. If that is true it makes the whole article suspect.

 

[SleepingWarrior]

Quote

"effectively breaking the liberal welfare system that enslaved mostly black people from their seemingly unending fates of dependency and broken families, limited education and statistically premature death"

I thought the numbers say there are more white people on welfare than blacks. If that is true it makes the whole article suspect.

Well statistically there are more whites in the US than blacks so I can see how more whites would be on it... now as for percentages of the populations of both groups it may show a higher percentage of blacks.

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

Quote

"effectively breaking the liberal welfare system that enslaved mostly black people from their seemingly unending fates of dependency and broken families, limited education and statistically premature death"

I thought the numbers say there are more white people on welfare than blacks. If that is true it makes the whole article suspect.

The point, one which is well known, is that the poor urban black family was torn assunder as women quickly learned that to be in the system, they HAD to be single...

 

[Hamletmaschine]

She's White, Kobe's Black: Case Closed!

Brother Harry Hardwick, Landover Baptist

The liberal media is at it again, my friends. I’m referring to all this nonsense concerning the fornication, nay adultery, of a basketball player from that devil-dominated country called “California” and the Colorado coal burner they refuse to identify because she’s embarrassed about being diddled by a black Japanese-looking person. All the articles in the secular (i.e., Satanic) media discuss all this silly stuff about rape, violence, extensive hoo-hoo injury, blood (and not from the Perfect Lamb) on FUBU clothing, lack of consent, blah, blah, blah. They never mention the only relevant point – she’s white and he’s just as colored as colored can be. They’re trying to focus our attention on a straw man argument so we don’t consider the Biblical implications of what is really going on. Yes, fellow Christians, believe it or not, even in this day and age, there are still sexual shenanigans occurring between Negroid men and normal women, who are apparently willing to endure an eternity in Hell for an afternoon joyriding on a sex organ of colossal size and stamina. (At least she had the good sense to make him take her from behind so she wouldn’t have to see the depravity.) Now, I suggest that any of you who brought your children with you today withdraw to the Gift Gallery (where you will be delighted to find that life-size busts of our President are now $400 off until Noon), because a subject such as this is too traumatizing for many Godly adults, much less for any youngster, who still believes in Santa and recognizes that people should know their place in life, to hear in public.

[Brief pause for dissemination of Gift Gallery coupons and mass exodus of parishioners]

Now, those of you who are still here are required to report every single word I say to your adult brothers and sisters in Christ who had to leave. It appears that a major figure in professional basketball who, needless to say, is the Negro, actually had sex with a little white girl in Colorado [gasps from the congregation]. Don’t you know that dear Sister-in-Christ Patsy Ramsey is thanking her lucky stars she had the foresight to kill little JonBenet – or it might be her daughter under the weight of that brutal colored man? Yes, friends, the perp, as anyone who has ever had his car broken into will have guessed, is dark-skinned. Yet, none of the unsaved reporters out there seem to give a hoot about this disgusting fact. Even though she admitted to kissing the colored boy [more gasps], the media have ignored the race issue altogether, instead focusing on whether she agreed to allow the boy to go any further. I know most of you know nothing about this incident because you’re True Christians™ and read only the church newsletter, your Bibles and the message boards at Free Republic Dot Com. But the heathen world has been inundated with stories about whether she, at some point, said “No,” as if that has anything at all to do with issue – or whether the Good Lord gives a tinker’s damn about the content of the conversation when miscegenates get nude and nasty. The bottom line is that Coby Bryant, the boy, is black as night, and the girl is as white as Rush Limbaugh’s inner thigh, so there can be no claim by either of them that they didn’t know what was what [grumbling in the congregation]. They met in a very expensive, well-lit hotel, not in a filthy alley, teeming with rats and winos, where this type of congress between people of different races normally occurs.

Needless to say, they’re both going to Hell. They will be in separate parts of Hell, of course, but both parts will be unpleasant, nonetheless. Now, I know I don’t need to cite all the Bible verses prohibiting race-mixing (or, to use the PC term today, “miscegenation”), but I will anyway. Take the pencils in front of you and write in the cover sheet of your Bibles the following verses: Deuteronomy 7:3; Numbers 36:3-9; First Kings 11:2; Nehemiah 13:25-27. Got those? Now, listen to this: God was furious when one of His chosen people (who used to be the Jews, before they murdered His only son) once brought a Mi-di-a-nite woman (some nondescript foreigner) back to his tent. Fortunately, one of the Jews wisely took a javelin and thrust it through both of them. God was so pleased that He released the eventual Christ-killers from the plague He had previously imposed on them (Numbers 25:6-8). What a shame some room service waiter hadn’t been summoned to the Bryant suite with a bottle of ripple and a shishkabob of chitlins so he could have thrust the skewer through both of them. It would have been like a scene from the new Quentin Tarantino movie, only inspired by the Word of God instead of by some skinny little Italian director’s diseased imagination.

Now, to this nebulous issue of so-called “rape.” The unsaved journalists seem to think that whether the boy raped her is dispositive of the matter – if he raped her, he should be punished; if not, everything is A-OK. Christians know better. If you are doing something that makes Jesus hold His Holy Nose, you aren’t going to get off the hook because you happened to be polite about it. Furthermore, we know that God has only limited animosity toward rape. The girl has admitted she said “No” only a couple of times, and in a timid voice, because she was afraid the boy would otherwise strangle her. The Bible makes clear that when a woman engaged to be married is raped, but fails to scream out, both she and the rapist must be stoned to death (Deuteronomy 22:23-24). But that is only the case if she fails to scream out in town, so we need to find out if this hotel was out in the country or not. To God, rape is like real estate: location, location, location! The situation here is also a bit quirky because it is unclear whether the chocolate-lover was engaged. If she was, and the hotel was in an urban area, both must be eliminated. If she wasn’t, then the boy is obligated to marry her (Deuteronomy 22:28-29). Now, this creates an unpleasant situation because the boy is already married. Since neither of them lives in Utah, has the surname “Osmond” or otherwise possesses the indicia of being a Mormon, the boy would have to divorce his wife, then marry the size-infatuated girl. Even though the boy’s ex-wife would never be permitted to remarry (Matthew 5:32), that is just one of the many inexplicable consequences of the Good Lord’s edicts.

Well, obviously, we can’t allow the Lord’s apparent oversight to create a marriage between two folks who would never be seated together in any decent restaurant, much less welcomed into a True Christian™ home. So, I think we must go back to the “go ahead and kill both of them” option that I mentioned earlier. You see how much wiser the Lord’s approach is to that of secular courts who mollycoddle miscreants with a malignant case of jungle fever? One glorious day – soon, oh, this I pray – all the courts in the land will adopt the Lord’s Bible as the only law of the land. When that blessed day arrives, nuisances like this case will be disposed of with little more than a free afternoon and a handful of stones. Glory!

 

[Daedalus77]

The point, one which is well known, is that the poor urban black family was torn assunder as women quickly learned that to be in the system, they HAD to be single...

You are correct that welfare breaks up families but I was questioning that the author said that it was mainly a black problem.

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

I hear the crowd orgasmed with his every move in a sold-out pre-season game...

Even if he raped her though, they both need to sit down in counseling and discuss his need to rape her so that they can heal. If he didn't rape her then they both need to sit down in counseling and discuss her need to be raped. Even give the guy another crack at it. Just to beginthe healing process.

Right?

Btw, you didn't recognize yourself by any chance now?

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

She wasn't implying it was not a white problem either.

She is pointing out that a lot of the disconnect with blacks is a direct result of failed Liberal Social Policies. I am sure the same argument is equally valid for a lot of white trash, too.

 

[Daedalus77]

She wasn't implying it was not a white problem either.

She is pointing out that a lot of the disconnect with blacks is a direct result of failed Liberal Social Policies. I am sure the same argument is equally valid for a lot of white trash, too.

I agree that welfare has destroyed the traditional family.

But.

When the author says "mostly black people" I think it does imply that they think it is mostly a black problem. When an author puts a spin like that on a problem, given the fact there are more white people on welfare, I have to be more suspect of every thing else in the article.

 

[sigh]

You know, Injun, I know dozens of liberals (I'm related to most of them), but I don't know a single one that fits the profile described in the piece you posted.

Not one. Not even close.

It's a load of shit.

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

That's funny because several people here came to mind, which, is why I bothered to post it at all.

Hamletsmachine is a contender, ding, ding, ding, which is why he posted in the manner he did.

I don't think teachers should be fawkin' students and he does. One real big difference between liberals and those of us slightly more conservative...



When you have power over others, using that power to gain sex, is a bad thing in theory to Liberals, but perfectly okay in practice, unless you are a conservative, in which case, you are a hypocrit.



I know the party line. And part of the reason I posted the article was that I saw me, the way I used to be. Maybe I'm shallow, maybe I should have had stronger faith in my Liberal Convictions, but they just weren't working out for me in the world I live in.

I could be soooooooo getting laid in my life, if I so desired.

 

[crysede]

Re: The ?Psychology? of Liberals

When crossed, narcissists become virulently angry and lash out with personal attacks on anyone who disagrees with their opinions. But because they crave adulation, they can become irresistibly charming in the very next minute, almost defying their audience to give them some slack. Sound familiar?

The second mental malady that characterizes liberals is borderline personality disorder, in which the afflicted are totally unable to tolerate the gray complexion of either life or of politics, always casting those who disagree with them in stark shades of black and white and often resorting to defamatory 'scorched earth' strategies. These are people who struggle to hide the fact that they have no consciences, no remorse and no feelings. In fact, they appear disconcertingly similar, and at times identical, to sociopaths. Sound familiar?

Naturally both of these sound very familiar. However, I'm a little shocked to learn that all politicians, lobbyists, and political commentators are liberals.

But anyways, you know I only vilify you because I care

 

[Fawkin'Injun]

Look. Some of them people on the GOP side are there because Gawd told them to do it...

You can't paint them with the same brush, in the same stroke, not unless you have some magic paint.

 

[Hamletmaschine]

That's funny because several people here came to mind, which, is why I bothered to post it at all.

Hamletsmachine is a contender, ding, ding, ding, which is why he posted in the manner he did.

I don't think teachers should be fawkin' students and he does. One real big difference between liberals and those of us slightly more conservative...



When you have power over others, using that power to gain sex, is a bad thing in theory to Liberals, but perfectly okay in practice, unless you are a conservative, in which case, you are a hypocrit.



I know the party line. And part of the reason I posted the article was that I saw me, the way I used to be. Maybe I'm shallow, maybe I should have had stronger faith in my Liberal Convictions, but they just weren't working out for me in the world I live in.

I could be soooooooo getting laid in my life, if I so desired.

You have to get out more, dude. I know lots of people fantasize about me, but yours are way outta control.