U
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
It's in keeping. I always thought the marines considered themselves and each other to be tough SOB's, but Vet doesn't want gays in the military because he's afraid some straight marines will get made fun of and their feelings will be hurt.I did not accuse anything. It was framed as a question. You claim to be a Marine yet you react like a little sissy.
Nice sidestep of the response to the salient part of your question...which you obviously asked in order to not answer mine.Obviously it's superior in your mind if you're going to defend it against the lawfully enacted consequences of the law.
Either you're ignoring for convenience sake, or don't understand, that that doesn't mean all laws should be voted on.You thinking a government of the people, by the people, and for the people, amounts to mob rule....
Does you wife know that if she was raped and murdered by a known repeat offender that you would defend his right to live as superior to hers?
We should send all the people on death row to your house merc.
No, we should lock them up without a chance for parole, unless they are exonerated by further investigation, like the person in the OP who was murdered by the state in a case of false identity.
Shit happens. Look at Fast & Furious. Federal killings.
I agree, so far as your post goes, but the fact is there's no need for the state o execute criminals. It accomplishes nothing. There's never been any proof of deterrence value and the cost is more than life in prison, as has been shown a million times. It's revenge, pure and simple, not even an effective punishment, since the condemned doesn't feel it. It just makes no sense at all. Put 'em in a cell, feed 'em enough to stay alive, let 'em stew about what they did. Much worse punishment than killing them, and it effectively eliminates the threat of repeat offense.
I see Moon Barker values the right to life of murderers higher than he does that of the victim.
No, we should lock them up without a chance for parole, unless they are exonerated by further investigation, like the person in the OP who was murdered by the state in a case of false identity.
I see Moon Barker values the right to life of murderers higher than he does that of the victim.
Oh common perg....that would save shit loads of tax payer money, save the CRJ system time and resources as well as making sure you don't execute any innocent people. A ridiculous idea...party pooper
![]()
If you want to talk to me, then talk to me you fucking coward.
I keep trying to stop making sense so I too can be one of the cowards on here like Vette. I just can't help myself.
Internet hero, good job merc.![]()
(His term for a Hispanic man.)koalabear said:Chihuahua busted!
koalabear said:[Black women who are into white men are] the ones that want a Father to stick around for the kids.
Internet hero, good job merc.![]()
I keep trying to stop making sense so I too can be one of the cowards on here like Vette. I just can't help myself.
I'll give vette one thing....he's right. It is the voters, they want to pay for it and live with arbitrary executions on their conscience....democracy is a bitch too.
The whole "right's for criminals" is bullshit though imo.
Lock them in a box and toss the key...slip them a bowl of gruel each day and a glass of water. Tax payers shouldn't be buying criminals college educations, health care, cable TV and internet either.
Is there a more cowardly act on a forum like this than putting someone on ignore and then continuing to argue with them? He's afraid of being proved wrong, like miles. Absolute cowardice. What else can you call it?
I only talk to you because I have all the other shared accounts on iggy.![]()