Texas judge rules Lesbian couple can't shack up

[eyer]

Why not, you ask?

Learn for yourself @ http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0521/Lesbian-couple-can-t-cohabitate-Why-not

 

[mercury14]

Why not, you ask?

Learn for yourself @ http://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Latest-News-Wires/2013/0521/Lesbian-couple-can-t-cohabitate-Why-not

This is why unequal marriage laws are discriminatory. It's not the judge's fault, his ruling appears to be the right one - it's the legislature's fault.

 

[kbate]

I feel a large rush of gratitude that the Children in Texas are safe from immorality by only being forced to witness sexual contact within holy matrimony.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

It doesn't have one damned ting to do with their sexual orientation.


kbate read before knee-jerking.

 

[kbate]

It doesn't have one damned ting to do with their sexual orientation. kbate read before knee-jerking.

Morality legislation is idiotic is the moral of the story.

 

[Busybody]

Morality legislation is idiotic is the moral of the story.

Depends on how Juan defines

Morality.

No?

Yes!

 

[JAMESBJOHNSON]

Faggots need their own state, say Hawaii or Puerto Rico or Massachusetts.

After I'm elected President I intend to confine all the Niggaz and Faggots and Islams to New England, and build forts along the west side of the Hudson River. Liberals I plan to confine to the part of America north of US Hiway 50.

 

[kbate]

Depends on how Juan defines

Morality.

No?

Yes!

You believe children are damaged when a bedroom door closes and the occupants are unmarried?

 

[SgtSpiderMan]

Enroll at UT and apply for campus housing.

 

[Busybody]

You believe children are damaged when a bedroom door closes and the occupants are unmarried?

No!

Did I say that?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Depends on how Juan defines

Morality.

No?

Yes!

We are not allowed to define morality, that is white Christian. Only the aberrant are allowed to define morality, only they have the right to judge. The people who signed the divorce decree should have opted out of the language, but they did not and now we're to blame for their fucking stupidity and kbate has take, once again, the whole gambit, hook, line and sinker instead of relying upon strict Libertarianism and the necessity of contracts and understanding that the onus is on the individual to know what they are signing, not for society to bend over backwards because some damned fools are too freaking stupid to breath.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

No!

Did I say that?

*chuckle*


And sigh accuses me of telling her what she thinks... lol ...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

Faggots need their own state, say Hawaii or Puerto Rico or Massachusetts.

After I'm elected President I intend to confine all the Niggaz and Faggots and Islams to New England, and build forts along the west side of the Hudson River. Liberals I plan to confine to the part of America north of US Hiway 50.

Hollywood is already their sanctuary city...

 

[kbate]

No!

Did I say that?

No, I asked you that, and in a miraculous display of good sense, you answered.

See how that works.

 

[kbate]

*chuckle*


And sigh accuses me of telling her what she thinks... lol ...

so asking a question is now telling what someone thinks?

You must have had a difficult time in school.

Teacher: "AJ, why how did you get 2+4= Liberal Bias"?

AJ: "stop telling me what I think!"

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

You know I'm right so you gravitated towards the ridiculous and trivial...

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

We all know the intent of the question.



It was of the, when did you stop beating your lesbian life partner type...

 

[Busybody]

No, I asked you that, and in a miraculous display of good sense, you answered.

See how that works.

I always answer, always


However, most answers are unacceptable to the (less)not mortality police

 

[sigh]

It doesn't have one damned ting to do with their sexual orientation.


kbate read before knee-jerking.

It does in the sense that if they were a heterosexual couple, they could simply be married and sidestep the law. As a homosexual couple, that option is off the table.

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

It does in the sense that if they were a heterosexual couple, they could simply be married and sidestep the law. As a homosexual couple, that option is off the table.

So now society is to blame because she signed a contract she didn't read or understand.


Boo-fucking-hoo!

 

[Busybody]

Can someone post the story?

 

[Busybody]

So now society is to blame because she signed a contract she didn't read or understand.


Boo-fucking-hoo!

I remember the divorce of D Trump and I Trump

He said they had a pre nup and they should bide by it


She said she didn't understand the pre nup when she signed it


But

Deserves half the estate cause she was smart enough to have helped him make his money


Huh


This sort of bs works with the protected class

 

[kbate]

So now society is to blame because she signed a contract she didn't read or understand.


Boo-fucking-hoo!

Strange. . . I didn't read that in Sigh's post. You wouldn't be 'putting the ridiculous' or 'telling her what she thinks' - would you?

 

[4est_4est_Gump]

I remember the divorce of D Trump and I Trump

He said they had a pre nup and they should bide by it


She said she didn't understand the pre nup when she signed it


But

Deserves half the estate cause she was smart enough to have helped him make his money


Huh


This sort of bs works with the protected class

By protected class, do you mean rich, lesbian or blonde?

 

[Busybody]

Strange. . . I didn't read that in Sigh's post. You wouldn't be 'putting the ridiculous' or 'telling her what she thinks' - would you?

Can u post the story, please