Rebel5soul
Literotica Guru
- Joined
- Aug 22, 2024
- Posts
- 6,378
Understood, but you aren't the only one reading this thread.I already mentioned those people in the post your originally responded to.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Understood, but you aren't the only one reading this thread.I already mentioned those people in the post your originally responded to.
How much was the prop network settlement again? I thought there were more digits there.WASHINGTON, DC: You’d think that after ABC coughed up a hefty $16 million in a defamation lawsuit to President Donald Trump, anchor George Stephanopoulos might choose his words a little more carefully.
Ok, no idea what the fuck you're.on about. I already called out the people you say I shouldn't forget. And you responded to the post that I did so.Understood, but you aren't the only one reading this thread.
Yes, I know the people personally who are part of the first responders in my community. There is a guy who's been a local firefighter for 20 years who lives around the corner.
A friend I went to high school with ended up becoming fire chief where I grew up.
And that's not including paramedics and cops that are friends of mine.
Politicians don't go into rescue mode, they leave it to the experts. I didn't see Hakeem out there in his alligator shoes helping out. On the other hand there are people behind the scenes doing an after action report and I'm sure there will be remedies forwarded.
That's not the kind of work I'm talking about, traitor. Fuck off.Politicians don't go into rescue mode, they leave it to the experts. I didn't see Hakeem out there in his alligator shoes helping out. On the other hand there are people behind the scenes doing an after action report and I'm sure there will be remedies forwarded.
People can pray and work at the same time.
Duplicate.No word yet on whether ICE showed up to deport them
Firefighters from Mexico join response efforts to catastrophic Texas floods
No, the federal and state government couldn't have done more. Perhaps the locals could have done more, time will tell.
Says you? Lol.No, the federal and state government couldn't have done more. Perhaps the locals could have done more, time will tell.
No, the federal and state government couldn't have done more. Perhaps the locals could have done more, time will tell.
They had meetings with local government at 11pm. Sent watch out at 5pm, warnings out at 130, 530 and 730
Racist5soul should (if they’re capable) read & comprehend the content of this report:
In April, Paul Yura, THE WARNING COORDINATION METEOROLOGIST for the NWS Austin/San Antonio office, retired early after 32 years in the field. According to NOAA, this role is second only to the meteorologist-in-charge and is critical for translating forecasts into community alerts, managing spotter networks, and coordinating with local emergency teams. The position remains unfilled due to a hiring freeze caused by federal cuts to NOAA under the Trump administration.
Around the same time, the Houston NWS office lost its meteorologist-in-charge and now has a 44% vacancy rate. These cutstriggered a wave of early retirements and left local offices scrambling to maintain coverage—often relying on virtual support or temporarily reassigned staff. That’s a real loss of local expertise and institutional memory.
And here’s the thing: even the best weather models don’t matter if the warnings don’t reach people or don’t convey urgency. That depends on communication infrastructure and relationships on the ground—which in turn depend on staffing and experience.
I’ve seen a lot of comments saying “the NWS did their job,” and that they did issue a flood watch. But if the information didn’t get to the right people in time—or in a way that made the risk clear enough to act on—then something broke down. I also understand there were cell service issues in the area, which only underscores how urgent it is to improve how we reach people quickly and reliably in rural or high-risk zones during emergencies. That breakdown might not be one person’s fault, and maybe this disaster could not have been prevented at all—only time and investigation will tell. But it’s still worth asking whether federal staffing decisions weakened the very systems meant to support local emergency managers, especially in high-risk regions like the Texas Hill Country.
![]()
![]()
DonOld & the MAGAt republicans (local, state, AND FEDERAL) directly contributed to the magnitude of the tragedy (number of deaths); full stop.
Hope that ^ helps.
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
They were adequately staffed and they provided sufficient warnings when needed.
"Some people" are OBVIOUSLY too stupid and myopic to comprehend the full implicate the information provided.
The indictable acts related to DonOld and the MAGAt republicans (local, state, AND FEDERAL) is in the report I provided; full stop:
In April, Paul Yura, THE WARNING COORDINATION METEOROLOGIST for the NWS Austin/San Antonio office, retired early after 32 years in the field. According to NOAA, this role is second only to the meteorologist-in-charge and is critical for translating forecasts into community alerts, managing spotter networks, and coordinating with local emergency teams. The position remains unfilled due to a hiring freeze caused by federal cuts to NOAA under the Trump administration.
Around the same time, the Houston NWS office lost its meteorologist-in-charge and now has a 44% vacancy rate. These cutstriggered a wave of early retirements and left local offices scrambling to maintain coverage—often relying on virtual support or temporarily reassigned staff. That’s a real loss of local expertise and institutional memory.
And here’s the thing: even the best weather models don’t matter if the warnings don’t reach people or don’t convey urgency. That depends on communication infrastructure and relationships on the ground—which in turn depend on staffing and experience.
I’ve seen a lot of comments saying “the NWS did their job,” and that they did issue a flood watch. But if the information didn’t get to the right people in time—or in a way that made the risk clear enough to act on—then something broke down. I also understand there were cell service issues in the area, which only underscores how urgent it is to improve how we reach people quickly and reliably in rural or high-risk zones during emergencies. That breakdown might not be one person’s fault, and maybe this disaster could not have been prevented at all—only time and investigation will tell. But it’s still worth asking whether federal staffing decisions weakened the very systems meant to support local emergency managers, especially in high-risk regions like the Texas Hill Country.
![]()
![]()
"Some people" should try reading and comprehending the provided information AGAIN.
Hope that ^ helps.
We. Told. Them. So.y
![]()
You keep posting copy pasta from a website and argue that others can't be non-repetitve... Lol
“Some people” can’t seem to formulate a persuasive, (and non-repetitive) “refuttal” to the damning evidence pointing to DonOld & the MAGAts republicans’ (local, state, AND FEDERAL) culpability for the magnitude of the tragedy (number of deaths) that was provided in this report:
In April, Paul Yura, THE WARNING COORDINATION METEOROLOGIST for the NWS Austin/San Antonio office, retired early after 32 years in the field. According to NOAA, this role is second only to the meteorologist-in-charge and is critical for translating forecasts into community alerts, managing spotter networks, and coordinating with local emergency teams. The position remains unfilled due to a hiring freeze caused by federal cuts to NOAA under the Trump administration.
Around the same time, the Houston NWS office lost its meteorologist-in-charge and now has a 44% vacancy rate. These cutstriggered a wave of early retirements and left local offices scrambling to maintain coverage—often relying on virtual support or temporarily reassigned staff. That’s a real loss of local expertise and institutional memory.
And here’s the thing: even the best weather models don’t matter if the warnings don’t reach people or don’t convey urgency. That depends on communication infrastructure and relationships on the ground—which in turn depend on staffing and experience.
I’ve seen a lot of comments saying “the NWS did their job,” and that they did issue a flood watch. But if the information didn’t get to the right people in time—or in a way that made the risk clear enough to act on—then something broke down. I also understand there were cell service issues in the area, which only underscores how urgent it is to improve how we reach people quickly and reliably in rural or high-risk zones during emergencies. That breakdown might not be one person’s fault, and maybe this disaster could not have been prevented at all—only time and investigation will tell. But it’s still worth asking whether federal staffing decisions weakened the very systems meant to support local emergency managers, especially in high-risk regions like the Texas Hill Country.
![]()
![]()
"Some people" seem to think repeatedly posting “NUH-UHHHH” qualifies as a “refuttal”.
"Some people"
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
Also, since your plagiarized your post, I thought I'd properly cite it for you
“Some people” can’t seem to formulate a persuasive, (and non-repetitive) “refuttal” to the damning evidence pointing to DonOld & the MAGAts republicans’ (local, state, AND FEDERAL) culpability for the magnitude of the tragedy (number of deaths) that was provided in this report:
In April, Paul Yura, THE WARNING COORDINATION METEOROLOGIST for the NWS Austin/San Antonio office, retired early after 32 years in the field. According to NOAA, this role is second only to the meteorologist-in-charge and is critical for translating forecasts into community alerts, managing spotter networks, and coordinating with local emergency teams. The position remains unfilled due to a hiring freeze caused by federal cuts to NOAA under the Trump administration.
Around the same time, the Houston NWS office lost its meteorologist-in-charge and now has a 44% vacancy rate. These cutstriggered a wave of early retirements and left local offices scrambling to maintain coverage—often relying on virtual support or temporarily reassigned staff. That’s a real loss of local expertise and institutional memory.
And here’s the thing: even the best weather models don’t matter if the warnings don’t reach people or don’t convey urgency. That depends on communication infrastructure and relationships on the ground—which in turn depend on staffing and experience.
I’ve seen a lot of comments saying “the NWS did their job,” and that they did issue a flood watch. But if the information didn’t get to the right people in time—or in a way that made the risk clear enough to act on—then something broke down. I also understand there were cell service issues in the area, which only underscores how urgent it is to improve how we reach people quickly and reliably in rural or high-risk zones during emergencies. That breakdown might not be one person’s fault, and maybe this disaster could not have been prevented at all—only time and investigation will tell. But it’s still worth asking whether federal staffing decisions weakened the very systems meant to support local emergency managers, especially in high-risk regions like the Texas Hill Country.
![]()
![]()
"Some people" seem to think repeatedly posting “NUH-UHHHH” qualifies as a “refuttal”.
"Some people"
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
Look at all this " non repetitive " arguing here"Some people" OBVIOUSLY FAILED to recognize that the original source WAS cited earlier in the thread (See: POSTS #52 & #57).
"Some people" also OBVIOUSLY FAIL to recognize their own hypocrisy / idiocy when it comes to repetitiveness AND the satirization of that repetitiveness by their betters.
Hope that ^ helps.
"Some people"
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()
Non repetitive arguments.....brought to you by Lax.
"Some people" should better inform themselves before making unfounded accusations.
And there would be zero need to repeat relevant information if myopic imbeciles could / would read & comprehend that information THE FIRST TIME.
Also:
The most repetitive “last word spaz” on the PB (II74) has zero room to talk…
"Some People" (II74)
We. Told. Them. So.
![]()