Ten at the most

A young woman should, in her teens and 20s, have sex with 10 at the most.

  • Sounds about right

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Sounds about right, assuming some things do not count

    Votes: 6 26.1%
  • Sounds too high; even possibly slutty

    Votes: 7 30.4%
  • Sounds too low; just use condoms and 'who's counting?'

    Votes: 10 43.5%

  • Total voters
    23
  • Poll closed .

Pure

Fiel a Verdad
Joined
Dec 20, 2001
Posts
15,135
Casual Relationships, Yes. Casual Sex, Not Really.
By ALEX WILLIAMS

New York Times
Published: April 3, 2005


FOR the young and the single in New York dating has always been a numbers game, whether it is tabulating the guy-to-girl ratio at a bar or guessing at the bank balance of the quarry across the dance floor. Still, it is not every night that a group of unattached young women in low-slung jeans sit around pondering questions that might stump a mathematician at Caltech, questions like can one plus nine ever equal just nine?


"I know a lot of people who will go home with the same guy they have before just because it's not going to raise their number," explained Jennifer Babbit, 26, a publicist.

"A lot of my friends will say: 'I started having sex with this guy, but it only lasted a minute. I don't know if it counted,' " offered Beth Whiffen, a former associate editor at Cosmopolitan.

The number in question is the total number of men that a woman has slept with, and the question is on their minds because they were among two dozen or so young Manhattanites who dropped by One Little West 12, a restaurant and club in the meatpacking district of Manhattan, on Tuesday to discuss "The Hookup Handbook: A Single Girl's Guide to Living It Up" by Andrea Lavinthal and Jessica Rozler, published last month (Simon Spotlight Entertainment).

The book's title and many of its guidelines ("Getting a room isn't just polite, it's a necessity") suggest that a new sexual revolution is afoot among a fast-and-loose generation nurtured on the wisdom of "Sex and the City," who see boyfriends as passé, dating as dated and the idea of commitment laughable. But an evening spent in the company of Ms. Lavinthal, Ms. Rozler and their friends suggests that mating rituals of the much-celebrated hookup culture, at least as practiced by young professional women, seems to owe as much to Doris Day as to Samantha Jones.

Yes, they take pride in having thrown off the shackles of earlier generations of single women. They are not waiting on Friday night hoping "he" will call. They make the first move. They happily see two or three guys simultaneously. Spontaneity is crucial, but even more is a good clean exit strategy from any guy who turns out to be Mr. Not Exactly.

"It's not that people aren't dating," explained Ms. Rozler, an editorial assistant at Allworth Press when she is not practicing nightclub anthropology. "It's that there's this weird gray area. People still want to be in relationships, but they don't want to be settling."

But even as they raise pink drinks in the air and roll their eyes at the absurdity of commitment, these are not women embracing sexual abandon. The courtship rites of this generation of urban singles seem to borrow from the mores of their grandmothers in the 1950's (date lots of boys; smooch, spoon, nuzzle or neck to your heart's content, but hold out for that pledge pin from Mr. Right) as much as from those of their mothers' love-the-one-you're-with 70's.

"Most girls don't have one-night stands," Ms. Whiffen said. "They might have one or two in their life."

Take the number discussion, for example. Yes, there are conquests, but there should not be too many of them. So among this group of women with three-inch heels tipping out of their $200 jeans what is the right number, that is, the last number before you hit the wrong one? Few women would want to go over 20, or even 15, Ms. Babbit said, because they would "think of themselves as big sluts."

"Ten at the most," Caroline Homlish, 24, summarized in a tone that brooked no dissent.

"A lot of girls are not having casual sex," explained Ms. Lavinthal, an editor at Cosmopolitan, even as she conceded that the title of her book had racy overtones.

It might come as a surprise that anyone under the age of 29 would need a definition for a term that has grown as ubiquitous in youth culture as customized ring tones. Still, the back cover of "The Hook-up Handbook" makes a stab at it: a hookup is "anything from making out to doing the nasty, generally with no commitment or plans for said commitment." But as Ms. Lavinthal and Ms. Rozler explain it, a hookup has less to do with what happens between people than with the surrounding circumstances: specifically, that the meeting is unplanned and even unexpected. "Nobody's waiting by the phone," Ms. Lavinthal said. "For one thing, you can take the phone with you."
 
Last edited:
What a bizarre number to be attaching importance to.

cantdog, shaking the head in amazement
 
Does it really matter? No matter how many opinions on the numbers of people a young woman should have sex with are formed, it won't change the ideals of those young women.
 
Another factoid:

Women with PhD's are twice as likely to be interested in a one night stand than those with Bachelor's Degrees.
 
as the article makes clear, the number 10 is proposed by (some of) the young women themselves. no outsider is asked to set the rules or judge.
 
And the proportion of stupid people in any given group is constant. In adolescents, in janitors, in Nobel laureates, always the same proportion.
 
Most girls don't have one night stands? One or two in their life?

I beg to differ. Having just spent two weeks with three 23 year old girls and two guys, and having heard the stories my sister tells (she's also 23) about the college and post-college scene, I am laughing hysterically at that quote.

Girls do have one night stands. Lots of them. Hooking up is very common, almost expected. It's like women's liberation has turned into, "Hi, I'm going to be a slut now".

Not that there's anything wrong with that - the girls know that the hook-ups are just that, which was not the case while I was in college.
 
For example, I was eating pussy today. I took off my glasses once they got between the thighs (it was kinda spontaneous) and now I find I am not wearing my fucking goddamn glasses. Great. Where the fuck are my fuckin glasses???
 
cantdog said:
For example, I was eating pussy today. I took off my glasses once they got between the thighs (it was kinda spontaneous) and now I find I am not wearing my fucking goddamn glasses. Great. Where the fuck are my fuckin glasses???

:D Forget about 'em. They're smeared anyway.
 
I haven't read this book, but here's my sister's take on it:

"Your comments about XX's friends hooking up made me laugh and made
me think of a book that I am reading. The book is called "Pledged: The
Secret Life of Sorority Girls," and it is so disturbing. It's written
by a woman who went undercover and shadowed a bunch of girls who
had just recently joined sororities, but the book is also based on her
research in hundreds of different schools around the country.

Everything about the whole thing is very disturbing and it is much
worse than even I thought it was. I talked to XX recently who goes
to ISU; two of her friends became sisters and then dropped out
because of all the promiscuity and the attitudes toward it. She basically
confirmed everything that I read in that book, it's so sad. Women's
liberation does not have to translate to being easy, especially when the
guys don't even appreciate what they're getting."
 
I read most of the article, but skimmed some as well. Not that it matters. Mostly, what I read was horseshit.

One or two one-night stands? It's not even something I can laugh at. I've heard the pre-planned, "You don't think I'm a slut do you? I mean, I almost never do things like this" about a million times, and they all say it with the same amount of practiced ease, because they've said it a million times.

I'm not knocking anyone, but to be honest, the numbers game is rediculous. Especially when it leads to the lies and deciet that being a slut and a womanizer really comes down to. I don't care how many guys, or whether or not she's promiscuous. That's just that: promiscuous.

Ten guys, twenty? Here're the questions: Are you clean? And if you decide you want something more, will you lie to me and fuck my friends?

That aside.... Hell, I'm not a virgin either.

Q_C
 
cantdog said:
For example, I was eating pussy today. I took off my glasses once they got between the thighs (it was kinda spontaneous) and now I find I am not wearing my fucking goddamn glasses. Great. Where the fuck are my fuckin glasses???

. :D .
 
Quiet_Cool said:
Ten guys, twenty? Here're the questions: Are you clean? And if you decide you want something more, will you lie to me and fuck my friends?

That aside.... Hell, I'm not a virgin either.

Q_C


Well said. It's terrible to have a number label and decide that once a woman passes that magic number, she is now a slut. Having sex with more than ten people doesn't make a woman a bad person or less worthy of a relationship or whatever.


SJ
 
I voted for the last one, especially the "who's counting?" part. I think it's great and I just regret that this female attitude wasn't more prevalent fifty years ago. It's too late now to do me any good.

I am very strongly in favor of equality, especially including gender equality. I believe women should get off their pedestals and throw them away. Men may have put them there generations ago but women have fought hard to stay on them, even though the reasons for them has long ago disappeared.

As I recall, there are several old threads where I was scorned for espousing such an opinion, and I even wrote an essay on the subject.
 
Unfortunately, if the number is high, I think less of the girl. I feel less inclined to be another notch, the more of them there are; and the only women I've known that could boast 10+ at 20 are very much skanky-ho-like.
 
I think having a set number is arbitrary, it isn't something that can be generalized. I'm 23 and I've only been with one man, I don't want to be judged by that number, or have someone view me as a statistic - people are worth more than that.
 
Joe Wordsworth said:
Unfortunately, if the number is high, I think less of the girl. I feel less inclined to be another notch, the more of them there are; and the only women I've known that could boast 10+ at 20 are very much skanky-ho-like.


Personally, I think that was a shitty thing to say, but you're entitled to your opinion. Curious though, what do you think of men who have slept with that many people?

SJ
 
sophia jane said:
Personally, I think that was a shitty thing to say, but you're entitled to your opinion. Curious though, what do you think of men who have slept with that many people?

SJ

Differently.
 
Count on the mofo to be comin up with another shitty thing to say. I think he's trolling you, laying out bait to see if you bite.
 
cantdog said:
Count on the mofo to be comin up with another shitty thing to say. I think he's trolling you, laying out bait to see if you bite.

Sadly it worked.

Going to walk away now before I get bitchy.

SJ
 
Joe Wordsworth said:
Unfortunately, if the number is high, I think less of the girl. I feel less inclined to be another notch, the more of them there are; and the only women I've known that could boast 10+ at 20 are very much skanky-ho-like.


um, why would you think less of someone for being promiscuous considering that you hang out on a porn board?

I'm hoping this was a joke but doubt it.

How's that Model T running?
 
sophia jane said:
Personally, I think that was a shitty thing to say, but you're entitled to your opinion. Curious though, what do you think of men who have slept with that many people?

SJ

Oh, but didn't you realise, sweets?? No matter what they say, for some men, there are still two different sets of rules and standards.

Prolific men can still 'sow their wild oats and learn to be a man'.
Prolific women will always be sluts.

*shrug*. I'm just disappointed that I'm surprised this attitude still exists - in the minds of some. :rolleyes:
 
cantdog said:
Count on the mofo to be comin up with another shitty thing to say. I think he's trolling you, laying out bait to see if you bite.
I wasn't trolling or "trying to come up with something shitty to say". For Heaven's sake, cant, get over yourself. On the table was "how do people feel about this", I answered how I felt about it. I didn't assert that I was necessarily right, that others should believe as I do, or that anyone is wrong for believing differently in any degree. I stated what I thought, and to be fair... I think its probably the most populous opinion--to give it some perspective. I'm hardly presenting something abhorrent and new. Grow up.

Belegon said:
um, why would you think less of someone for being promiscuous considering that you hang out on a porn board?

I'm hoping this was a joke but doubt it.

How's that Model T running?
Why would I? I don't really know, to be honest, I just do. It's probably a combination of how I was raised, living as part of this society, knowing really skanky-ho-like women who consider their greatest achievement the ability to bed skanky geeky lonely guys, etc. It's hardly the rightest view (if there is such a thing), but its mine and I can't really think myself out of it. I remember I dated a girl once who eventually told me she'd slept with five guys and I was dissappointed. I didn't choose to be disappointed, I just was.

And I don't see how my hanging out on a porn board means I can't think less of promiscuous women.
 
Back
Top