Teasing a guy until he prematurely orgasms

Not into blue jeans huh? hehe, but they're so much fun to wiggle n dry hump in. :devil: hehe

So true :)

**Smiles wide, swaying her pale curves in her jeans** Well, glad you like them. I'd better not hijack the thread again, lol. This is about premature ejaculation, not li'l ole me.:rolleyes:

Right, let's stay focused!

I bet cum stains were an even bigger problem back in olden times because of all the satin and lace. It also must have taken women A LOT longer to get undressed back then.

Poor guys ... I bet a lot of them couldn't wait :devil: :D

http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/15200000/Katherine-katherine-pierce-and-elena-gilbert-15226798-500-333.jpg
 
So true :)



Right, let's stay focused!

I bet cum stains were an even bigger problem back in olden times because of all the satin and lace. It also must have taken women A LOT longer to get undressed back then.

Poor guys ... I bet a lot of them couldn't wait :devil: :D

http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/15200000/Katherine-katherine-pierce-and-elena-gilbert-15226798-500-333.jpg

I couldn't imagine wearing all that.

**Grinning, returns the black halo to her head, attempting oh-so-hard, to behave herself**
 
Clothes?

I couldn't imagine wearing all that.

**Grinning, returns the black halo to her head, attempting oh-so-hard, to behave herself**

NOT important. Whats important is to take her to a hi class store, give her a few hundred to blow, and see what she does next.


https://imgur.com/a/rMxDN

However, I do refuse to take her to opera. Puts me to sleep.
 
So true :)



Right, let's stay focused!

I bet cum stains were an even bigger problem back in olden times because of all the satin and lace. It also must have taken women A LOT longer to get undressed back then.

Poor guys ... I bet a lot of them couldn't wait :devil: :D

http://images4.fanpop.com/image/photos/15200000/Katherine-katherine-pierce-and-elena-gilbert-15226798-500-333.jpg

Back then I believe it would have been even more embarrassing for the gentlemen in question, as ideas about sex were more rigid. Probably would cause a lot of gossip.
 
Back then I believe it would have been even more embarrassing for the gentlemen in question, as ideas about sex were more rigid. Probably would cause a lot of gossip.

Maybe some of them did not want her to undress. It could also be the other way round :)


Well yes, but remember too that I'm talking about back in the day when the old saying "men have needs" was accepted as general fact. Women probably walked around with pretty (usually pearl white) handkerchiefs not because they had allergies. I bet many fine ladies were quite adept at giving quick handies under the table and on those long "proper" walks.

Plus, don't forget all the horseback riding. No one will ever convince me that women always rode side-saddle because to be totally honest, it just feels too darn good not to straddle! A guy could probably get them to agree to just about anything after a two or three mile full gallop ride! :devil:
 
Well yes, but remember too that I'm talking about back in the day when the old saying "men have needs" was accepted as general fact. Women probably walked around with pretty (usually pearl white) handkerchiefs not because they had allergies. I bet many fine ladies were quite adept at giving quick handies under the table and on those long "proper" walks.

Plus, don't forget all the horseback riding. No one will ever convince me that women always rode side-saddle because to be totally honest, it just feels too darn good not to straddle! A guy could probably get them to agree to just about anything after a two or three mile full gallop ride! :devil:


As usual, you have some insight Id not considered.

And yes, re: the horses.
 
Splitting hairs...

What counts is her intent, and his reload time factor. Can U imagine a dame making him blow so it wouldnt get up enough to do its duty??? Now, thats wicked....

https://i.imgur.com/LSzqtHl.gifv

But if she gets that boy ready for action, mmmmmmmmmm.
 
No, that's full on enticing it unless he comes as soon as you touch him there.

Yeah, I agree. As confessed previously, I do that to my husband in movie theaters sometimes. I wouldn't consider it premature ejaculation either, especially since he's usually trying not to juice his pants.

Although, now that I think about it, it certainly didn't take as long to get him off during Wonder Woman this past summer as it did Fast & Furious! :D
 
Grrrrrr....

Yeah, I agree. As confessed previously, I do that to my husband in movie theaters sometimes. I wouldn't consider it premature ejaculation either, especially since he's usually trying not to juice his pants.

Although, now that I think about it, it certainly didn't take as long to get him off during Wonder Woman this past summer as it did Fast & Furious! :D

Read the reviews. I am prolly gonna watch it alone on Netflix, pretend its porn, and its really ME she wants. What a doll!!!
 
Yeah, I agree. As confessed previously, I do that to my husband in movie theaters sometimes. I wouldn't consider it premature ejaculation either, especially since he's usually trying not to juice his pants.

Although, now that I think about it, it certainly didn't take as long to get him off during Wonder Woman this past summer as it did Fast & Furious! :D

Ah, the theater, one of my favorite places. I suppose you can't blame him for that LizVegas.
 
Back
Top