Please read the report at;
http://www.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/children/09/26/teaching.sex/index.html
Teaching young adults about sex: Parents want them to be abstinent.
Laughing, then think how absurd, seems like a classic case of;
Do as I say, not as I do (or did).
In this study regarding sex education in schools it stated that;
" skill-based instruction -- such as how to deal with the pressures and emotional consequences of sexual activity, how to talk to partners or parents about sexual health issues and where to get medical help -- is not taught as frequently or consistently."
Is the school the best place to teach this topic and should this be the job of the school system? I am ambivalent about the idea. The mechanics can be taught but the love and tenderness, I do not think so. Any instruction is good, but on the other hand this is an important topic that seems to be missed at home. Are parents foisting this on the school system because they themselves do not feel comfortable about discussing the topic?
The report title tells us something;
Sex education: Parents want kids better informed
I suggest a mentoring process would be far more effect for young adults. I was amazed to see that abstinence was also a prime topic. This I believe is a slightly hypocritical towards young adults. With regards to the parents; Is it a case of do as I say, or do as I do. Here the parents had early sex and then turn around and tell the teachers to instruct abstinence. Well people it is not working. Read some of the reports of young people abusing their sexuality in mass. Let's be pragmatic about this; young adults want and crave sex and love, and they do personate what they see in adults. Advertising promoted this non-stop -- our society is filled with messages stating sex is good. Let's not forget that sex is natural and normal. It is intrinsic to our life forms and programmed by genetics and enabled by hormones to start in action at puberty. I suggest we face the topic straight on and not try and teach abstinence (unnatural state), but instead instruct on the beauty and emotions involved and to be respectful to themselves when participating. Although I agree all options should be presented including abstinence. Also is it not important to teach that love and sex go hand and hand and are the only way to truly understand both? My feelings are; the school system is not the place to have this intimate instruction undertaken… how could it be?
My last point here is; why leave young adults to teach each other about sex. Is this not a case of the blind leading the blind? I think so, and once again point you back to the 'Virginity Lost' topic, I posted about six months ago.
Or if that does not convince you look at this CNN report;
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9910/21/suburban.syphilis.01/
Please post your comments, ideas, and opinions on this topic.
As Kipling pointed out: words are the most powerful drug for humans.
Jane smiles; Literotica… the natural replacement for Viagra?
http://www.cnn.com/2000/HEALTH/children/09/26/teaching.sex/index.html
Teaching young adults about sex: Parents want them to be abstinent.
Laughing, then think how absurd, seems like a classic case of;
Do as I say, not as I do (or did).
In this study regarding sex education in schools it stated that;
" skill-based instruction -- such as how to deal with the pressures and emotional consequences of sexual activity, how to talk to partners or parents about sexual health issues and where to get medical help -- is not taught as frequently or consistently."
Is the school the best place to teach this topic and should this be the job of the school system? I am ambivalent about the idea. The mechanics can be taught but the love and tenderness, I do not think so. Any instruction is good, but on the other hand this is an important topic that seems to be missed at home. Are parents foisting this on the school system because they themselves do not feel comfortable about discussing the topic?
The report title tells us something;
Sex education: Parents want kids better informed
I suggest a mentoring process would be far more effect for young adults. I was amazed to see that abstinence was also a prime topic. This I believe is a slightly hypocritical towards young adults. With regards to the parents; Is it a case of do as I say, or do as I do. Here the parents had early sex and then turn around and tell the teachers to instruct abstinence. Well people it is not working. Read some of the reports of young people abusing their sexuality in mass. Let's be pragmatic about this; young adults want and crave sex and love, and they do personate what they see in adults. Advertising promoted this non-stop -- our society is filled with messages stating sex is good. Let's not forget that sex is natural and normal. It is intrinsic to our life forms and programmed by genetics and enabled by hormones to start in action at puberty. I suggest we face the topic straight on and not try and teach abstinence (unnatural state), but instead instruct on the beauty and emotions involved and to be respectful to themselves when participating. Although I agree all options should be presented including abstinence. Also is it not important to teach that love and sex go hand and hand and are the only way to truly understand both? My feelings are; the school system is not the place to have this intimate instruction undertaken… how could it be?
My last point here is; why leave young adults to teach each other about sex. Is this not a case of the blind leading the blind? I think so, and once again point you back to the 'Virginity Lost' topic, I posted about six months ago.
Or if that does not convince you look at this CNN report;
http://www.cnn.com/HEALTH/9910/21/suburban.syphilis.01/
Please post your comments, ideas, and opinions on this topic.
As Kipling pointed out: words are the most powerful drug for humans.
Jane smiles; Literotica… the natural replacement for Viagra?