Swimsuits!

[KarenS1975]

Yeah... zerogpt, isgen.ai, aiphotocheck, deepai.org, undetectable.ai, aiseo, isthisai.com, sightengine.com and isitai.com all have it as 96% or higher Ai.

The Metadata shows c2pa, which is an Ai signature. If the photo isnt Ai, then it has been edited by Ai.View attachment 2641906

Don’t read the forum for one day and all hell breaks loose.


My two cents after downloading and looking at the files with no outside assistance.


Original posted Photo in question


It is a JPG File, 5 tags, No C2PA present, No GPT Present. This is a direct read of the meta data. The 5 tags are all simple housekeeping for Exif.


CK30101 Screen Shot of his test


His is a PNG File, 47 tags, C2PA Present, GPT shown. He had an app do the read, so he isn’t saying he directly read the meta data from the file. File may have been converted from JPG to PNG but given that he says this is the same file, picking up 42 tags and the gpt-image information is not normal. I can’t think of any way it happened except some software or SOMEONE added this information. Well, maybe these are not the same file. That would explain it.


Both are still posted and both can be compared so no point in beating a dead horse.


MCA-256 not matching. Impossible if CK30101 has the same file. Maybe he converted from JPG to PNG back to JPG, that would give a different fingerprint, but why?


This is not adding up.


The only explanation that makes sense is that someone is trying to win an argument by any means possible. Why else would you say there is meta data in a file that isn’t there, when anyone can open it up and look?

 

[Landshark48]

The wife’s

 

[KarenS1975]

I have had multiple moderators thank me for what I do.

Not saying that you’re lying, but name one. I’ll bet I can get your ass booted off here by showing the shit you pulled in this thread to the moderators. You are absolutely using a different file and I don’t think for a minute that is an accident. Did you not think anyone would notice the difference or you just think you can explain it all away?

 

[KarenS1975]

Yeah... zerogpt, isgen.ai, aiphotocheck, deepai.org, undetectable.ai, aiseo, isthisai.com, sightengine.com and isitai.com all have it as 96% or higher Ai.

I’ll just start and verify these one at a time this morning because your honesty is very much in question, I’d look outside to check if you told me the sun came up this morning.



…..erased quite a bit after discovering file change.

Well, I’ll be damned. This wasn’t a total waste of time after all. I just found out how all of that meta data is getting put in there. You aren’t a fraud after all. Just an asshole. Let me work on this for a while. This isn’t going to be easy to explain, but it’s definatley there. Maybe I didn’t discover how exactly but saw it happen in real time and I didn’t do it.

….

I need to contact one of the companies on your list because if I say something that turns out to be wrong the shit is going to hit the fan. My file has the meta deta in it now and it wasn’t there before. I have run a couple of tests with some snapshots and every one of them was changed with similar but different meta data. It doesn’t make sense…I can’t even think of a way that it got there. All uploading, no downloading. The file is different but no change in the time stamp. Weird.

 

[WeeDeek]

This has taken a turn.

gettin to the stage its hardly worthwhile looking at pics and commenting as they may be fake?

Or now may not be fake?

Know nothing about AI but il keep an eye on this to see if i can learn something new to save me ditching this forum

 

[NoelleSwallowsTheDrop]

I shall try to post an image that people will not have issues with for any reason!

my other new bikini time for a swim!

https://ibb.co/V0Zp8mtn

 

[hotoldrguy]

I shall try to post an image that people will not have issues with for any reason!

my other new bikini time for a swim!

https://ibb.co/V0Zp8mtn

Gorgeous!

 

[NoelleSwallowsTheDrop]

I’ll just start and verify these one at a time this morning because your honesty is very much in question, I’d look outside to check if you told me the sun came up this morning.

Your first claim. ZeroGPt was the first of a long list of detectors you claim gave you a 96% or higher AI probability.

FACT: You are a liar. I just got back from zeroGPT and it is only capable of TEXT. No image identification whatsoever. I’ll be back after I check the next one. Why do I feel like I’m wasting my time?

I do not know much about AI and how to create it or manipulate it.
But I do know how to use google and most websites with some basic menus and links.
So in your language:

FACT: You are a liar (or an idiot).
https://www.zerogpt.com/ai-image-detector

 

[NightOfPassion2]

I shall try to post an image that people will not have issues with for any reason!

my other new bikini time for a swim!

https://ibb.co/V0Zp8mtn

Beautiful . Thank you for making Friday that much better

 

[TalkToMeInSB]

I shall try to post an image that people will not have issues with for any reason!

my other new bikini time for a swim!

https://ibb.co/V0Zp8mtn

Fucking delicious! Mmmlummmm...

 

[KentBloke63]

I shall try to post an image that people will not have issues with for any reason!

my other new bikini time for a swim!

https://ibb.co/V0Zp8mtn

Noooo, I bet that never sees water

 

[MiaBabe23]

It is as real as the banter in here and as real as the stories published.

So you’re admitting it’s visual fiction. Creative on some level perhaps. But fiction

 

[ck30101]

Not saying that you’re lying, but name one. I’ll bet I can get your ass booted off here by showing the shit you pulled in this thread to the moderators. You are absolutely using a different file and I don’t think for a minute that is an accident. Did you not think anyone would notice the difference or you just think you can explain it all away?

First off, go fuck yourself. My whole purpose here is to expose the frauds. To even suggest that I faked any of this shit is ridiculous.

Second, you kind of showed your ass when you said zero didn't have image detection. Tried to sound smart and shit the bed there. Feel free to run the picture through any of those detectors and tell me if I'm wrong.

Third, @barefootgirl69 can vouch for me.

Fourth, look at the close up from her picture that i posted, or just zoom in on your own. Are you going to seriously tell me tbat isnt Ai?

Fifth, again go fuck yourself. I only do this shit to try to protect people on here. I know people that have been scammed here by the fake accounts. People like you that have 30 posts in 15 years giving me a hard time about this are the real problem.

 

[barefootgirl69]

Anyone, please share why AI imagery is considered corrupt or not acceptable forms of art, like the manufactured stories we have posted for others to enjoy?

It's not acceptable because the Literotica owners say it is not acceptable. Stories get kicked back if AI is detected. Blurring a tattoo for safety reasons, fixing a blemish - that isn't AI. Anything else just to enhance things is catfishing. This forum is for amateurs to post themselves.

Not saying that you’re lying, but name one. I’ll bet I can get your ass booted off here by showing the shit you pulled in this thread to the moderators. You are absolutely using a different file and I don’t think for a minute that is an accident. Did you not think anyone would notice the difference or you just think you can explain it all away?

Hi, Karen. I'm bfg. I'm one of those moderators who appreciate all the work he's done in pointing out fakes, catfish, and people who steal other's images. He's one of a few that we ask to check things regularly.

Just thought I'd introduce myself.