LITEROTICA PODCAST
LIT CAMS (200 Free Tokens)ADULT TOYSVOD MOVIES

Swimsuits!

ck30101 said:
Yeah... zerogpt, isgen.ai, aiphotocheck, deepai.org, undetectable.ai, aiseo, isthisai.com, sightengine.com and isitai.com all have it as 96% or higher Ai.

The Metadata shows c2pa, which is an Ai signature. If the photo isnt Ai, then it has been edited by Ai.View attachment 2641906
Click to expand...
Don’t read the forum for one day and all hell breaks loose.


My two cents after downloading and looking at the files with no outside assistance.


Original posted Photo in question


It is a JPG File, 5 tags, No C2PA present, No GPT Present. This is a direct read of the meta data. The 5 tags are all simple housekeeping for Exif.


CK30101 Screen Shot of his test


His is a PNG File, 47 tags, C2PA Present, GPT shown. He had an app do the read, so he isn’t saying he directly read the meta data from the file. File may have been converted from JPG to PNG but given that he says this is the same file, picking up 42 tags and the gpt-image information is not normal. I can’t think of any way it happened except some software or SOMEONE added this information. Well, maybe these are not the same file. That would explain it.


Both are still posted and both can be compared so no point in beating a dead horse.


MCA-256 not matching. Impossible if CK30101 has the same file. Maybe he converted from JPG to PNG back to JPG, that would give a different fingerprint, but why?


This is not adding up.


The only explanation that makes sense is that someone is trying to win an argument by any means possible. Why else would you say there is meta data in a file that isn’t there, when anyone can open it up and look?
 
Last edited:
ck30101 said:
I have had multiple moderators thank me for what I do.
Click to expand...

Not saying that you’re lying, but name one. I’ll bet I can get your ass booted off here by showing the shit you pulled in this thread to the moderators. You are absolutely using a different file and I don’t think for a minute that is an accident. Did you not think anyone would notice the difference or you just think you can explain it all away?
 
ck30101 said:
Yeah... zerogpt, isgen.ai, aiphotocheck, deepai.org, undetectable.ai, aiseo, isthisai.com, sightengine.com and isitai.com all have it as 96% or higher Ai.
Click to expand...

I’ll just start and verify these one at a time this morning because your honesty is very much in question, I’d look outside to check if you told me the sun came up this morning.

Your first claim. ZeroGPt was the first of a long list of detectors you claim gave you a 96% or higher AI probability.

FACT: You are a liar. I just got back from zeroGPT and it is only capable of TEXT. No image identification whatsoever. I’ll be back after I check the next one. Why do I feel like I’m wasting my time?

Second Claim: Is gen identified as AI at 96% or higher.
Ding Ding Ding! You finally told the truth about something.

Undetectable. Damn you were doing so good. Another text only site. I’m going to tell you right now, 3 strikes and you are out. I’m just going to assume you wrote down a list of all the ai det ectors and thought no one would take the time to check behind you.

DeepAI I’ll give you this one to keep from striking out but you didn’t tell the whole truth about this. It dumps everything into one pile including photoshop manipulation.

Well, I’ll be damned. This wasn’t a total waste of time after all. I just found out how all of that meta data is getting put in there. You aren’t a fraud after all. Just an asshole. Let me work on this for a while. This isn’t going to be easy to explain, but it’s definatley there.

I need to contact one of the companies on your list because if I say something that turns out to be wrong the shit is going to hit the fan. My file has the meta deta in it now and it wasn’t there before. I have run a couple of tests with some snapshots and every one of them was changed with similar but different meta data.. It doesn’t make sense…I can’t even think of a way that it got there. All uploading, no downloading
 
Last edited:
This has taken a turn.

gettin to the stage its hardly worthwhile looking at pics and commenting as they may be fake?

Or now may not be fake?

Know nothing about AI but il keep an eye on this to see if i can learn something new to save me ditching this forum
 
KarenS1975 said:
I’ll just start and verify these one at a time this morning because your honesty is very much in question, I’d look outside to check if you told me the sun came up this morning.

Your first claim. ZeroGPt was the first of a long list of detectors you claim gave you a 96% or higher AI probability.

FACT: You are a liar. I just got back from zeroGPT and it is only capable of TEXT. No image identification whatsoever. I’ll be back after I check the next one. Why do I feel like I’m wasting my time?
Click to expand...
I do not know much about AI and how to create it or manipulate it.
But I do know how to use google and most websites with some basic menus and links.
So in your language:

FACT: You are a liar (or an idiot).
https://www.zerogpt.com/ai-image-detector
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Similar threads

pilotguy123
Bikini/swimsuit picks… let’s bring back the summer early
Replies
3
Views
617
pilotguy123
pilotguy123
Sue_Render
Hidden gems!
2 3
Replies
52
Views
3K
crashD
crashD
P
Little pic update thread....
Replies
6
Views
291
patrick_cf
P
ShelbiVigdis
Shelbi's Sanctuary
8 9 10
Replies
246
Views
21K
Olderwiserstillhorny
Olderwiserstillhorny
T
Neck and Shoulder appriciation thread
Replies
13
Views
1K
MarilynMonroeFan
MarilynMonroeFan
Back
Top