Suspended Student May Be Expelled for Rest of the Year for Playing With Toy Gun

Grades 1 through 12.

Thank you.

Eleven years of military experience. Knowing the real differences between men and women doesn't make a sexist, don't make yourself out to be a fool by claiming otherwise.

Look, I have no idea about who the person is that was picked as the new leader of the Air Force Academy (and I'm too lazy to research just to.... ) but to be dismissive of someone for their gender doesn't seem right to me.

I have to assume that there is certain criteria (years of service, distinction during your career etc) that needs to be met before one can even be considered for a leadership role. I am assuming that the people who pick the leaders have had military careers themselves.

Speaking for my experience with Indian Armed Forces... some of the most sexist assholes I've ever seen. The female officers are twice as tough and twice as smart as their peers, they need to constantly prove their mettle. And I've argued with the good folks there about the unfairness of it all and their response. Well, it's a matter of our nation's security you can't take chances.
 
It probably will, unless she is post-menopausal. It is commonly accepted that PMS is a valid mitigation of criminal activities. As for being mean and nasty during her periods, that is not a plus in a head of a university. It might be an advantage in combat, but not in instruction.

Yes, but you see in PeePee's world the head of the academy is leading the Air Force during battle times and dropping petals. :rolleyes:
 
Yes, but you see in PeePee's world the head of the academy is leading the Air Force during battle times and dropping petals. :rolleyes:

Yes

AIR FARCE will drop ROSE PETALS

If she is really pissed

Will drop

LETTERS OF ADMONITION:mad:
 
It's all part of the feminization of American male children. Little boys are not allowed to be little boys, and they are not allowed to defend themselves in any realm where the school system can influence. Boys have been suspended for doodling pictures of fighter aircraft in my town. Walk into any elementary school room and see if there is anything on the walls that would appeal to a little boy, it all has the kind of flavor that appeals to little girls and the women behind the desks.
You're absolutely right. Assault weapons and fighter aircraft are only suitable for little boys to play with. Adults who value such things aren't fully mature.
 
Yes, you have no idea but what seems right by your standard, instead of those proven by thousands upon thousands of military conflicts beginning in antiquity, are the right way to go. Anyone who says different is a sexist.

The criteria is, push women into roles of leadership at all cost, with an end game of integrating them in combat roles and commands, through a process of re-defined standards that diminish the male role, and subordinate the national security to the principles of social change.

I don't see anyone providing any evidence for why she is a bad choice apart from being a female (I don't even know this person's name... because no one has quoted any facts so far).

I am calling you a sexist not because our opinions differ but because you have provided no examples to prove her unworthiness/unsuitability to the role apart from her gender.
 
Yes, you have no idea but what seems right by your standard, instead of those proven by thousands upon thousands of military conflicts beginning in antiquity, are the right way to go. Anyone who says different is a sexist.

The criteria is, push women into roles of leadership at all cost, with an end game of integrating them in combat roles and commands, through a process of re-defined standards that diminish the male role, and subordinate the national security to the principles of social change.




Why don't you, the Indian people, demand a regiment of all female staffed combat battalions, train it up, give it the best weapons, and put it into the field so that it can prove it's ability to defeat an enemy on the battlefield, and when they do, sign up even more and eclipse the abilities of your long suffering men, give them a well earned rest from the bloody toils of war with the superior combat power of your women. Because to say they are not capable of defeating an enemy on the battlefield on their own, you are saying their presence in the all male army combat arms weakens it. Here in America, liberals don't care if it weakens our ability to prevail on the battlefield, all that matters is social justice, not victory.

I don't think it's accurate to say that "liberals don't care if it weakens our ability to prevail on the battlefield, all that matters is social justice, not victory." They WANT to weaken the US armed forces, which is why they have been sabotaging the military for at least the last fifty years, and probably even longer than that. :eek:
 
You're absolutely right. Assault weapons and fighter aircraft are only suitable for little boys to play with. Adults who value such things aren't fully mature.

That depends on what they are playing. If it's cowboy or cops and robbers, then toy six-guns or other pistols are the best. If they're playing soldier, they should have assault weapons, maybe even artillery and tanks and fighter jets.
 
I would not worry so much about children being suspended or expelled from school over playing with guns.

Common Core, with was accepted by 45 States and DC will be turing all the children into a "collective". Their desire to do anything against what they are being indoctrinated in will lead to a stoppage of any kind of "playing" by children.

The government will get the kids, one way or another....:(
 
Public education=MASS INDOCTRINATION

I don't know if you have kids, but if you do, and you are not up to date on Common Core, you should read about it.

Not only is it incredibly socialist (teaching "feelings" over cognitive learning....and encouraging everyone to "just be who they are" instead of encouraging them to strive for more)....

BUT, and this is the scary part....they will be data mining from K-12. There are 400 points of data that they want to record. These will be done through the computer "assessments" that will be given. Some of the data is about homelife and parents.

Those in charge of Common Core "say" it will not be given to the government, but the states were required to sign on to the data mining as they approved Common Core.

Of course, the states had to agree to adopt Common Core 5 months before the standards were even written (sound familiar?.....Obamacare). Also, to be allowed to apply for funding through Race To The Top and to receive a waiver from No Child Left Behind, the states had to sign onto Common Core.

One more thing that is becoming controlled nationally by the government!
 
my kids went to PVT school

some TURD had the BALLS to try to say one of my kids needed RITALIN

I almost DECKED the fucking asshole

I told him

"MY KID IS RESTLESS CAUSE HE GETS IT THE 1ST TIME, DOESNT NEED TO HEAR SHIT 8 TIMES"

My kid is now 28....A Prof Of Bio at Cal Tech and has his own RESEARCH LAB with HIS name on it at the School

TEACHERS=LOSERS
 
my kids went to PVT school

some TURD had the BALLS to try to say one of my kids needed RITALIN

I almost DECKED the fucking asshole

I told him

"MY KID IS RESTLESS CAUSE HE GETS IT THE 1ST TIME, DOESNT NEED TO HEAR SHIT 8 TIMES"

My kid is now 28....A Prof Of Bio at Cal Tech and has his own RESEARCH LAB with HIS name on it at the School

TEACHERS=LOSERS

Then this could affect your grandchildren one day.

There are very good teachers. There are very bad ones. Common Core is not so much about teachers as it is a "National Curriculum". It is really really bad and people need to push back, have their states do this as well!

Last thing we need is a government indoctrinating the kids more so than they already are!
 
They are pro gay, colored and Muslim anti men, white and anti America
 
I would not worry so much about children being suspended or expelled from school over playing with guns.

Common Core, with was accepted by 45 States and DC will be turing all the children into a "collective". Their desire to do anything against what they are being indoctrinated in will lead to a stoppage of any kind of "playing" by children.

The government will get the kids, one way or another....:(

I'm really curious, just how will Common Core do that?
 
Back
Top