Suicidal empathy

[ll74]

Interesting, and somewhat akin to Teh Famileh Bizness. Shirtsleeves to shirtsleeves in three generations. The first work in their shirtsleeves (and vests) to start and build the thing, the second continues and is able to appear suited - more high-faluting - and probably can join the cunt-ry club, and the third inherent, has no appreciation, and bleeds it dry, losing the suits in the process. Sans vests.


Ours seems closer to boarder jumpers than third wave to me.

View attachment 2671452

 

[YDB95]

OK shit for brains, Reagan expressed an opinion, he had NOTHING to do with blocking any passage.

You aren't a political opponent............you're a liar.

You either didn't read the link or didn't understand it. No surprise there. Reagan played a key role in the campaign against passage, and was credited with making a big difference.

It didn't narrow it down to 20 weeks it read starting at 20 weeks. The precedent is making it legal to kill a baby, a viable fetus.

Which is a great way to imply that there are lots of elective third-trimester abortions happening. Whoever wrote that was probably smart enough to know they couldn't actually say that, since there's no evidence of any such thing happening. There's no law against colonizing Neptune at the moment either, you know.

 

[icanhelp1]

OK shit for brains, Reagan expressed an opinion, he had NOTHING to do with blocking any passage.

You aren't a political opponent............you're a liar.

They lie by omission, take things out of context, example; Trump said he would make the straight of Hormuz a possession. Right after them words were spoken he had a grin on his face. Cite the exception over the rule, twist or change the subject matter or just plain lie outright.

I remember the left's outcry when the court overturned R VS W. Sent that authority to the states. They went batshit crazy whining the courts made abortion illegal. The whole R vs W ruling back in 1972 was flawed law. The court legislating from the bench. They bitched precedent. Srare Decicis does not protect bad law

Their favorite is Trump wants to eliminate Medicare and Medicaid. They fed us that bullshit when Republicans were trying to pass Biden's own CR. Trump and republicans want to eliminate paying billions of dollars to the middle man and directing that money to citizens.

OK shit for brains, Reagan expressed an opinion, he had NOTHING to do with blocking any passage.

You aren't a political opponent............you're a liar.

They'll find one talking point, usually misinformation, and run it through their media echo chamber.

Reagan expressed disagreement with socialized medicine, he didn't block Medicare/Medicaid.
Medicare imo was a good program if managed properly. What Reagan's cautionary views were creating government dependency making citizens too reliant on government programs. In many ways he was spot on. It's a social program that's gone off the rails. Congress failed miserably in maintaining it's solvency. Billions in fraud. Then there's the ACA which is a pyramid scheme bankrupting the whole system. Eliminate the fraud, put guard rails that insure only citizens that qualify for Medicare get Medicare and Medicaid used to provide healthcare strictly for The poorest of American citizens. Failed immigration policy, abuses by states and lack of oversight is going to eventually bankrupt Medicaid. We have millions of undocumented migrants and now we own them, we can't just refuse them healthcare, that would be inhumane. We’re paying for congressional malfeasance.

 

[icanhelp1]

You either didn't read the link or didn't understand it. No surprise there. Reagan played a key role in the campaign against passage, and was credited with making a big difference.


Which is a great way to imply that there are lots of elective third-trimester abortions happening. Whoever wrote that was probably smart enough to know they couldn't actually say that, since there's no evidence of any such thing happening. There's no law against colonizing Neptune at the moment either, you know.

You said there’s literally zero. Now, in MA, they are sanctioning murder. This E/O pulls out all the stops. It will be abused.

 

[YDB95]

You said there’s literally zero.

Correct. No one has ever chosen to have an abortion when they've already settled on the baby's name and bought a crib, etc. It simply does not happen.

Now, in MA, they are sanctioning murder. This E/O pulls out all the stops. It will be abused.

Exactly what makes you think anyone would have an elective abortion at (for example) 35 weeks? By that time, it's obviously a wanted pregnancy. Especially in Massachusetts, where there are few if any roadblocks in the first trimester like there are in many red states.