Story rejected for alleged use of AI

pipczka

Your Lover
Joined
Oct 2, 2025
Posts
13
Good morning guys, you have rejected my story for a use of "AI". Which is completely false.

I translated my story by hand as requested and I still can't get it approved, I prefer to be told that I write badly or that my grammar is bad.
How can I solve this? It's already frustrating
 
They won't (or maybe can't) tell you what's tripping the AI detection. Too many repetitive lines, "He turned, walked away, never looking back." The phrase 'never looking back' or some other similar expression is repeated time and again. Opulent used multiple times, or other AI trigger words; one occurrence of anything shouldn't trigger it. Check here, https://aiphrasefinder.com/common-ai-words/. There are sites out there where you can run short segments at a time. The best one is about to be sunset.
 
Last edited:
Good morning guys, you have rejected my story for a use of "AI". Which is completely false.

I translated my story by hand as requested and I still can't get it approved, I prefer to be told that I write badly or that my grammar is bad.
How can I solve this? It's already frustrating

Have you tried asking a native-speaker human editor to go through it? Even translating it by hand yourself, depending on your level of English it might be coming across as unnatural which is what they are flagging.

There are plenty of volunteers (including myself) in the list to choose from
 
Good morning guys, you have rejected my story for a use of "AI". Which is completely false.

I translated my story by hand as requested and I still can't get it approved, I prefer to be told that I write badly or that my grammar is bad.
How can I solve this? It's already frustrating
Getting the same thing
 
They won't (or maybe can't) tell you what's tripping the AI detection. Too many repetitive lines, "He turned, walked away, never looking back." The phrase 'never looking back' or some other similar expression is repeated time and again. Opulent used multiple times, or other AI trigger words; one occurrence of anything shouldn't trigger it. Check here, https://aiphrasefinder.com/common-ai-words/. There are sites out there where you can run short segments at a time. The best one is about to be sunset.
 
That's crazy that's been a line in litterature for decades! This crap is going to make it impossible to get published!
 
They won't (or maybe can't) tell you what's tripping the AI detection. Too many repetitive lines, "He turned, walked away, never looking back." The phrase 'never looking back' or some other similar expression is repeated time and again. Opulent used multiple times, or other AI trigger words; one occurrence of anything shouldn't trigger it. Check here, https://aiphrasefinder.com/common-ai-words/. There are sites out there where you can run short segments at a time. The best one is about to be sunset.
You can't say "none of us knows" and then immediately turn around and guess a bunch of stuff.

All of which is wrong, btw.
 
Well, since one of the people I ghostwrite for uses AI and pays me to de-IA the text, I do understand how AI writes. My guesses are based on what I've seen in his stories. But maybe I'm just silly. I don't mind being silly. Why do you get upset with me for guessing on something? Especially since I admit these things are only possibilities. What I gave him was a starting point, nothing more, and I didn't claim that it was foolproof or that following my suggestion would get his work through.
First of all, you saying "nobody knows" in the same breath as "here's a bunch of guesses" is just silly.

Secondly, yes. I do.
 
Why do you get upset with me for guessing on something? Especially since I admit these things are only possibilities. What I gave him was a starting point, nothing more, and I didn't claim that it was foolproof or that following my suggestion would get his work through.
Because look!
That's crazy that's been a line in litterature for decades! This crap is going to make it impossible to get published!
Your baseless fear mongering is panicking the FNGs.

Be a veteran. Act like you've been here before. Set an example.
 
I know there have been false positive rejections. I've never said anyone who's been rejected was because of a false positive, nor that they weren't. But some of the writers who've been rejected, I believe them when they say it was an unfounded rejection.
Also, just so we're all on the same page, you don't know that pipczka's rejection was a false positive.
Don't have a clue where a non-linked link was supposed to go. On what you intended, I wouldn't venture a guess. And at this point, I see no purpose in continuing our discussion. Consider yourself the victor in a war you are only waging. This is the point we've discussed in another thread, about when to drop out of a thread. For me, in this one, it's post 17.
I'll give you one guess where it was going to link to. Then I start charging you ElonBux for extra guesses
 
Back
Top