Stopping the Caravan.....maybe.

There's all sorts of rumors as to why so many are making the dangerous trek.

As a thought, why doesn't Trump put his money where his mouth is? That is, contract with the Mexican Federales and provide logistic, material and financial support to return to their homes? However, Trump is using the caravan for his political goals

Lastly, American forces (Navy, Marines, etc.) have been used to aid foreign countries in the time of natural disasters. The caveat is that the foreign country requested US assistance

this is rich

Trump is using the caravan for his political goals?

that's about as sane as anybody thinking this caravan is made up of poor innocent migrants trying to escape oppression


it amazes me the sheer ignorance of people this day and age
 
Your hero Scalia ruled in 1993 that "it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in a deportation proceeding."

Due process of law is not full constitutional rights. It's simply a right to a legal proceeding of some kind, could be a Marine Captain denying asylum under terms of martial law.
 
Due process of law is not full constitutional rights. It's simply a right to a legal proceeding of some kind, could be a Marine Captain denying asylum under terms of martial law.

Trump is going to run into a lot of trouble if he tries to declare martial law, even along the border.
 
:rolleyes: Lawyers do not "subvert."

Yes they do. They filed suits that turned out to be frivolous against the Travel Ban which was held to be legal. They tried and failed to subvert the lawful authority of the CinC.
 
this is rich

Trump is using the caravan for his political goals?

that's about as sane as anybody thinking this caravan is made up of poor innocent migrants trying to escape oppression


it amazes me the sheer ignorance of people this day and age

Ironic...lol
 
*View post*

Yes dipshit, but they aren't in the United States yet. They're still a 1000 miles away. Friggin' idiot.:rolleyes::rolleyes::rolleyes:

PS: And when they get here they still don't have full Constitutional rights.


Wrong again, Vettie. Even being foreigners a 1000 miles away doesn't mean they don't enjoy some US constitutional protections.

A previous Supreme Court case as an example ...

https://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/06-1195.ZS.html

Petitioners have the constitutional privilege of habeas corpus, even at Guantanamo ... and the Supreme Court didn't question the Government’s position that Cuba maintains sovereignty.


Poor baby. Save that can of corn. Maybe one day you'll be right.
 
Due process of law is not full constitutional rights. It's simply a right to a legal proceeding of some kind, could be a Marine Captain denying asylum under terms of martial law.

Don't you think that if Scalia could have disposed of the case without invoking the Constitution, he would have done so?
 
Yes they do. They filed suits that turned out to be frivolous against the Travel Ban which was held to be legal. They tried and failed to subvert the lawful authority of the CinC.

None of this has to do with the president's authority as CinC; that's strictly military. And lawsuits are never subversive.
 
Last edited:
Due process of law is not full constitutional rights. It's simply a right to a legal proceeding of some kind, could be a Marine Captain denying asylum under terms of martial law.

So they have constitutional rights.
 
There's absolutely no reason that a group organized together for the express purpose of trying to embarrass the president of the United States and his party which is in power should be coddled.

What about (!) the caravans that made the trek under prior administrations? Were they preemptively trying to embarrass 45?

Lemme get this straight. Thousands of desperate Hondurans - men, women, and children - have band together for a thousands of miles trek for the express purpose of embarrassing Trump?

Meth. It's a helluva drug. :(

Is Q-#### gonna ignore his dumbuckery? Of course he is.
 
the issue isnt that there may be good guys among them and so many may need help

THAT MEANS SHIT!

the issue is.....DONT FUCKING COME IN ILLEGALLY

we dont want/need/ you
 
I feel no empathy for military-aged male refugees to Europe and the US.

Send the fuckers back to help the women and elders whom they left to fight violence on their own,
and let in only families and the truly vulnerable.
 
I feel no empathy for military-aged male refugees to Europe and the US.

Send the fuckers back to help the women and elders whom they left to fight violence on their own,
and let in only families and the truly vulnerable.
Send the breadwinners home, but keep the dependents. How does that make sense?
 
Send the breadwinners home, but keep the dependents. How does that make sense?

What difference does it make? Your so-called "breadwinners" do not report that they are living with the mothers who register for benefits as single mothers.

Information on how to navigate and maximize benefits from our welfare system is readily available. The Mexican Government even printed up a pamphlet on how to apply for benefits.
 
Back
Top