Stfu, You!

[NOIRTRASH]

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will112215.php3

These days you gotta get a license anointed by a special interest group before you can speak on most topics.

I violated this law recently. Her dog pulled a friend of mine off her porch. She was hurt and went to the emergency room. NO PROBLEMO they assured her.

Three weeks later she was in worse pain than at the start.

I told her, YOU GOT A BROKEN ARM. She went to a different MD for diagnosis. She had a broken arm.

I'd go to jail if word got out I know more than a licensed AMA member.

 

[ms_ann_thrope]

I's ok to yell "fire" in a crowd if you are actually shooting at people.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

http://www.jewishworldreview.com/cols/will112215.php3

These days you gotta get a license anointed by a special interest group before you can speak on most topics.

I violated this law recently. Her dog pulled a friend of mine off her porch. She was hurt and went to the emergency room. NO PROBLEMO they assured her.

Three weeks later she was in worse pain than at the start.

I told her, YOU GOT A BROKEN ARM. She went to a different MD for diagnosis. She had a broken arm.

I'd go to jail if word got out I know more than a licensed AMA member.

You would not go to jail on the basis of your superior knowledge in isolated incidents, but you would find yourself hiring an attorney pretty quickly if you went around diagnosing people's arms without a license.

The case you cited is far more outrageous than your real life circumstantial example.

Dr. Ron Hines had a veterinary license. The state veterinary board suspended it when Hines violated a state law that prohibits vets from "establishing a veterinarian-client-patient relationship" solely by electronic means unless the vet has previously physically examined the animal.

Sounds good at first blush, right? But nothing in Texas law prohibits vets from dispensing advice by phone or internet once that initial "exam" takes place. NONE of that electronically dispensed advice, regardless of how far in the future it is given, would need to be in any way related to that initial screening.

Thus, the Texas law is, in effect if not intent, primarily about how veterinarians establish relationships with clients/patients. And it is going to be very difficult for the State of Texas to demonstrate a compelling licensing interest to do that, much less do it by infringing the right of free speech AND dispensing of expert advice by a qualified, licensed practitioner, AND depriving one's right to engage in fair trade and commerce.

This should be an easy one for SCOTUS.

 

[NOIRTRASH]

You would not go to jail on the basis of your superior knowledge in isolated incidents, but you would find yourself hiring an attorney pretty quickly if you went around diagnosing people's arms without a license.

The case you cited is far more outrageous than your real life circumstantial example.

Dr. Ron Hines had a veterinary license. The state veterinary board suspended it when Hines violated a state law that prohibits vets from "establishing a veterinarian-client-patient relationship" solely by electronic means unless the vet has previously physically examined the animal.

Sounds good at first blush, right? But nothing in Texas law prohibits vets from dispensing advice by phone or internet once that initial "exam" takes place. NONE of that electronically dispensed advice, regardless of how far in the future it is given, would need to be in any way related to that initial screening.

Thus, the Texas law is, in effect if not intent, primarily about how veterinarians establish relationships with clients/patients. And it is going to be very difficult for the State of Texas to demonstrate a compelling licensing interest to do that, much less do it by infringing the right of free speech AND dispensing of expert advice by a qualified, licensed practitioner, AND depriving one's right to engage in fair trade and commerce.

This should be an easy one for SCOTUS.

I did it again today. STOP ME! I told a woman how I discovered OTC allergy pills and cholesterol meds, taken together, drop blood sugar levels too low. I prescribed taking them hours apart. Test strips confirm it.

MDs hate it when I confront them with their stupid opinions. I missed my calling.

The GATB listed RESEARCH PHYSICIAN as my highest vocation aptitude.

 

[Colonel Hogan]

I did it again today. STOP ME! I told a woman how I discovered OTC allergy pills and cholesterol meds, taken together, drop blood sugar levels too low. I prescribed taking them hours apart. Test strips confirm it.

MDs hate it when I confront them with their stupid opinions. I missed my calling.

The GATB listed RESEARCH PHYSICIAN as my highest vocation aptitude.

That's it. You were warned. You're going DOWN!

 

[NOIRTRASH]

That's it. You were warned. You're going DOWN!

Only if your vagina smells like fish.