Steve Scalise Shot

You know, 1 thing has been lost in all this hyperbole;

No one died at the hands of the shooter.

The rest is all dross and window dressing.

I pointed that out. Even with a "WEAPON OF WAR!!!" it requires training and practice or luck to kill people. No training necessary with cars and swimming pools
 
Arsenal?

You had a building set aside for your guns? That's rather impressive.

One a nice sunny day, heading down to watch some national figures having a nice little practice game, which of those numerous firearms would you remove from your arsenal building to take with you to that game?

If tbe answer is "none of them" why not?

Two none of them because I've retired to the mountains and spend my days chasing a little white ball.
 
So what? Is practicing for a ball game being tyrannical?:rolleyes:

No, it's just wasting time that could be better spent actually getting some work done. Or maybe that's where they go to discuss legislative proposals they don't want anyone else to know about.
 
Are you saying government has reached that point, so the shooting was justified?

Because Rand Paul was not saying that it has.

Obviously I am not, you desperate twat. Rule of thumb: if Rand Paul says something, assume I believe the opposite.

So what? Is practicing for a ball game being tyrannical?:rolleyes:

I wish I could say I was disappointed in the stunning stupidity of your response, but I wasn't really expecting any better, so.
 
The point is that the idea that arms might someday have to be taken up against the government is less of a fringe idea than it used to be.

Which reminds me: how many times during the last campaign did Trump openly discuss the possibility that "Second Amendment people" might have to assassinate Hillary Clinton? It was more than just a couple.



Those of us who have been expressing alarm about the mainstreaming of political violence certainly don't have anything to feel ashamed about today, no matter how many alts and pathetic banned retreads insist that we do.
 
The point is that the idea that arms might someday have to be taken up against the government is less of a fringe idea than it used to be.

Which reminds me: how many times during the last campaign did Trump openly discuss the possibility that "Second Amendment people" might have to assassinate Hillary Clinton? It was more than just a couple.



Those of us who have been expressing alarm about the mainstreaming of political violence certainly don't have anything to feel ashamed about today, no matter how many alts and pathetic banned retreads insist that we do.
Loretta Lynch: Need more marching, blood, death on streets


Read more at http://mobile.wnd.com/2017/03/lorett...2fiC9wxYmiF.99
 
The point is that the idea that arms might someday have to be taken up against the government is less of a fringe idea than it used to be.

Which reminds me: how many times during the last campaign did Trump openly discuss the possibility that "Second Amendment people" might have to assassinate Hillary Clinton? It was more than just a couple.



Those of us who have been expressing alarm about the mainstreaming of political violence certainly don't have anything to feel ashamed about today, no matter how many alts and pathetic banned retreads insist that we do.

LOL..
 
I wish I could say I was disappointed in the stunning stupidity of your response, but I wasn't really expecting any better, so.

That's because you're a friggin idiot who doesn't understand what you're talking about. I'll assume the same every time I read one of your posts which will be few and far between. So, do get lost somewhere in the jungle of idiocy you normally hide out in.
 
The point is that the idea that arms might someday have to be taken up against the government is less of a fringe idea than it used to be.

Which reminds me: how many times during the last campaign did Trump openly discuss the possibility that "Second Amendment people" might have to assassinate Hillary Clinton? It was more than just a couple.



Those of us who have been expressing alarm about the mainstreaming of political violence certainly don't have anything to feel ashamed about today, no matter how many alts and pathetic banned retreads insist that we do.

How many times has Ishmael hinted that the time for arming against the government is near? These crackpots in the BroPatrol are the worst kind of hypocrites.
 
It's being said the shooter's Facebook page looks like what's heard on the standard ten person CNN news panel. LOL
 
Why, just a few weeks ago, violence in politics was a chuckling matter:


You don't have a first amendment right to invade a man's space and jam a mic into his face. Apparently, the people of Montana agree. That's all that matters. The press has to reclaim its manners.:D


I wonder what changed? :confused:
 
It's being said the shooter's Facebook page looks like what's heard on the standard ten person CNN news panel. LOL
He got that tactic from Trump. Don't let the enemy know what your plan is.

Does your LOL mean you laughed about that? I fail to see the humor.
 
It's being said the shooter's Facebook page looks like what's found on the Facebook pages of all the left-leaning posters on the GB. LOL
FYP for relevancy.

Lauthner had a copy of Mao's little red book and IdiotNextDoor is still insisting that shooting happened because of Republicans.

This shooter believes every single thing WrongAsPerUsual believes and he says they can hold their heads high here since ideology being highly probable for the shooters actual motivation is irrelevant.
 
He got that tactic from Trump. Don't let the enemy know what your plan is.

Does your LOL mean you laughed about that? I fail to see the humor.

That's because your ox is being gored. That, and the fact that you fail to see a lot.
 
Back
Top