Squirting study

[GiggLeGasm]

why yes.. that did make me google "vagina radiator"

http://cdn.whisper.sh/whisper.sh/050bb812e5a9604822728b39340a7ba53bb4d6-wm.jpg

 

[Cumference]

I finally got around to reading that article about female ejaculation. You know, those researchers seriously need to get a life.

May I ask, why you think that?

 

[Cumference]

why yes.. that did make me google "vagina radiator"

I know the feeling.

Write it in google the moment the thought strikes you.... At least I've learned not to start with a picture search!


What is seen, can't be made unseen.

 

[IrisAlthea]

So.... she squirts... coolant? That kinda looks like it might stain the sheets.
http://www.abro.com/media/images/products/107_full.jpg

"Use only in well-ventilated areas."

 

[Que]

So.... she squirts... coolant? That kinda looks like it might stain the sheets.

I thought the way he described it sounded like a perspiring pussy.

http://www.motifake.com/image/demotivational-poster/1207/hot-weather-weather-hot-cat-sweat-summer-demotivational-posters-1343609991.jpg

 

[midwestyankee]

Never in my life would I have been able to predict that one day I would come to Lit and find female ejaculation and Jane Austen show up in the same post. I may now have to retire as I believe I have seen it all.

 

[Cumference]

Never in my life would I have been able to predict that one day I would come to Lit and find female ejaculation and Jane Austen show up in the same post. I may now have to retire as I believe I have seen it all.

That could be the thing that could break "Internet Rule 34"!

I refuse to believe, that you can find a video of Jane Austen ejaculating anywhere on the Interwebs!

 

[Emerson40]

I refuse to believe, that you can find a video of Jane Austen ejaculating anywhere on the Interwebs!

*Challenge accepted!*

 

[Aphro]

*Subscribed for Jane Austen squirting*

 

[Miles Long]

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good internet connection must be in want of a Jane Austen squirting video.

 

[Emerson40]

While you are all waiting, please sample and enjoy a refreshing beverage I am bringing to market.
(I recognize a hot trend when I see one!)


http://25.media.tumblr.com/29998cd3024b27bceb18331d4ff0c53f/tumblr_mzkpdj3rnK1qkv3o0o1_500.jpg





Be sure to get in on the ground floor of this incredible craze that is gaining momentum, by contributing to my Kickstarter* campaign to get squirt in a can to the gushing masses.

*A portion of profits will go to "SquirtSearch", a non-profit think-tank to research and explore all faucets, I mean facets of things squirty.​

 

[Harold_Hill]

May I ask, why you think that?

Because their report is dumb. These are the kind of researchers that could study the oceans and come to the conclusion that water is wet. Everything in the article has been on the internet for years on web sites like JSTOR, or maybe even Google books. They should have spent their grant money on pizza and beer and used Google.

 

[GiggLeGasm]

you don't find it a little ironic that you think THEY need to get a life while we sit here and waste time on the internet? at least they got paid for discussing this.

oh..
and pass another slice of pizza

 

[Cumference]

Because their report is dumb. These are the kind of researchers that could study the oceans and come to the conclusion that water is wet. Everything in the article has been on the internet for years on web sites like JSTOR, or maybe even Google books. They should have spent their grant money on pizza and beer and used Google.

Why "dumb"?
Because you do not agree with the results?
Are their results "wrong"?


In this case "X" was observed. You can recreate their experiment, and see if you get a different result (in which case either they must be wrong, or two different things can happen) or you get the same result, and strengthen the theory. (But still does not exclude that something else can happen too, if the subjects or circumstances were different)


And using google is a rather poor choice: At best you get second hand data, and very little new knowledge is made.

The way to generate new knowledge, is to set up testable hypotheses and test them in controlled experiments.

 

[littlecordelera]

I once dated a guy who was a trauma surgeon. He said that often times victims of car accidents came to the emergency room all worried about a fluid that poured from their nose shortly after impact. They feared they had cracked their skull and it was cranial fluid. He explained that the intense emotion of a wreck will often release enough adrenaline to cause a massive histamine response. That response causes the body to quickly release a gush of fluids, basically water, from mucus membranes. He said it happens all the time. The vagina is certainly full of mucus membranes and a good orgasm can be a very intense thing. Could this be it?

 

[midwestyankee]

I once dated a guy who was a trauma surgeon. He said that often times victims of car accidents came to the emergency room all worried about a fluid that poured from their nose shortly after impact. They feared they had cracked their skull and it was cranial fluid. He explained that the intense emotion of a wreck will often release enough adrenaline to cause a massive histamine response. That response causes the body to quickly release a gush of fluids, basically water, from mucus membranes. He said it happens all the time. The vagina is certainly full of mucus membranes and a good orgasm can be a very intense thing. Could this be it?

I've never heard this before. Fascinating.

 

[Mr.G]

The vagina is certainly full of mucus membranes and a good orgasm can be a very intense thing. Could this be it?

I still think it is a of fluid build-up in the SKEENE glands. The longer she is aroused the more fluid is pumped in there. If she G-GASMS quickly and every 45 seconds thereafter until the sun comes back up then VERY LITTLE fluid is squirted. If you turn her on for 4 or 5 HOURS (and especially if she is "large skinned) she will flood the basement.

Could there be an accompanying build up and release of light mucus? Of course. That is primarily natural lubrication anyway so very intense series of build-ups or G-GASMS will produce the obvious too.

Without necessary arousal the research team working on CADAVERS could not find a source of any fluid (udder than the bladder) OR any concentration of nerves hence their claim that G-SPOTS were a myth and anything associated with them was too. Further (just like the study using TWINS) they claimed any woman who CLAIMED to have experienced a G-GASM were cruel pathetic bitches whose ONLY porpoise was to make OTHER WOMEN feel inadequate and inferior.

ANYBODY who has read my TRY THIS thread in the HOW TO CAFE knows that this is also my main aim ... to make women feel sexually disempowered, inadequate and inferior.

 

[GiggLeGasm]

I would argue that the fluid women ejaculate during a sexual encounter is nothing at all like the histamine response associated with trauma.. the mechanisms are scientifically very different. It never ceases to amaze me, though, how these discussions can eventually lead to comments related to ego..
I don't really see that in regard to other sexual topics.

 

[Cumference]

......
Without necessary arousal the research team working on CAVERS could not find a source of any fluid (udder than the bladder) OR any concentration of nerves hence their claim that G-SPOTS were a myth and anything associated with them was too. Further (just like the study using TWINS) they claimed any woman who CLAIMED to have experienced a G-GASM were cruel pathetic bitches whose ONLY porpoise was to make OTHER WOMEN feel inadequate and inferior.

ANYBODY who has read my TRY THIS thread in the HOW TO CAFE knows that this is also my main aim ... to make women feel sexually disempowered, inadequate and inferior.

"CAVERS"
Sorry, I'm not a native speaker. Is that an abbreviation? If not, what has cave exploration to do with squirting?


Regarding the other part of the quote above.

Are we talking facts or are we talking religion here?

What you actually say is "it must not be urine, because that will make women feel bad. Should it be urine, then it must be denied by all means".

I think the only one who has used any derogatory words in relation to that study is you.
The study concludes, that in the subjects tested, the fluid that was expelled, was similar to the urine sample the delivered before diddling away, and that the bladder emptied when "ejaculating".

 

[Mr.G]

CUM ... Some of that is SARCASM. The rest is dismissal of this latest study. From personal " research " AND feedback from thousands who have read my TRY THIS thread I KNOW that most women are NOT ejaculating URINE.

Study after study has determined absolutely nothing and when a study consists of 7 women (or 13 CADAVERS - sorry) I must fall back on what I know and what others have posted and also KNOW.

One of the reasons, as I have explained before, that I dismiss these constant claims of ""IT'S PEEE!!!!" is that I know most of the time it is NOT pee AND publishing the "fact" that it is pee puts women who do gush or squirt in a position where they may be divorced, beaten up or even killed. Unless something is definitive - and to date none of these studies have been - then they should be very careful calling the fluid urine.

If it doesn't look like urine then it's NOT urine.
If it doesn't feel like urine then it's NOT urine.
If it doesn't smell like urine then it's NOT urine.
If it doesn't taste like urine then it's NOT urine.

As one woman has already pointed out ... I'm questioning whether a woman can even orgasm like that - in a LAB and with a hose up their urethra to seek fluid up there ... somewhere. I have been on this site for 10 plus years helping people realize the potential of the G-SPOT and it pisses me off to no end when some study still doesn't get it, assumes that women are just faking it and conclude it is being done simply to make other women feel bad. and YA, I use derogatory words to describe that. Get over it.

 

[littlecordelera]

I would argue that the fluid women ejaculate during a sexual encounter is nothing at all like the histamine response associated with trauma.. the mechanisms are scientifically very different.

How are the mechanisms different? Women have a huge adrenaline surge when they orgasm and he pointed out that it was the adrenaline rush that caused the histamine response. And if no one knows exactly what the fluid is then how can we know it's different?

 

[IrisAlthea]

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good internet connection must be in want of a Jane Austen squirting video.

Perfectly paraphrased.

 

[GiggLeGasm]

How are the mechanisms different? Women have a huge adrenaline surge when they orgasm and he pointed out that it was the adrenaline rush that caused the histamine response. And if no one knows exactly what the fluid is then how can we know it's different?

they actually do know what is in the fluids. I presume (and I freely admit that I don't know) that the histamine associated with TBI is an immune response that triggers neurotransmitters. With orgasm, even though there is also a histamine response, they know that many of the neurotransmitters are associated with pleasure receptors. Also, I wonder if neurotransmitters are released in a different order with sex. Fight or flight sets in pretty quickly in an emergency. I would think that it is approached more gradually with sexual play.
I don't know though.. and I'm happy to admit that.

 

[Emerson40]

*Subscribed for Jane Austen squirting*

It is a truth universally acknowledged, that a single man in possession of a good internet connection must be in want of a Jane Austen squirting video.

So close but alas, a red herring.


http://media.tumblr.com/tumblr_lmc0pqfxuC1qehnt6.jpg

 

[Hornywetcanuck]

Personal thoughts

When I squirt hubby says he can feel it around his cock and it certainly feels to me like it's coming from my pussy so I'm not sure about the study!