So, when Phrodeau is proven wrong, he chickens out and disappears

Le Jacquelope

Loves Spam
Joined
Apr 9, 2003
Posts
76,445
Now he's scared as fuck of crossing me any more.

Kinda like everyone else who's blundered into my path and got left smouldering on the roadside.

"If Canada invaded the US looking for WMD's (funny, how we've got plenty of those!) and Al Qaeda connections (hello, Dubya anyone? OIL industry, anyone?), there'd be rape rooms GALORE and even guillotines set up all over the country, and I'd be one of the first to build a head chopper to welcome our Canadian wanna-be masters. I love killing people, especially invaders and bullies. No use in denying that. Hell, I'd probably kill the Americans running the rape rooms AND the invaders, too. I'd be in anger management heaven. And you know what? The American citizen asshats collaborating with the invaders (Canadian or otherwise) would get a mail bomb or two in their box from me." - me

"You're extolling rape rooms." - Phrodeau




Yup, you're an idiot, Phrodeau, and now you're going to have a hundred people rushing in here to make idiots of themselves trying to rewrite the dictionary.

Or you're going to have a lot of people looking at you, seeing how much of a real dumbass you are, and slinking away without saying a word so as to not hurt your feelings.

LOL!
 
LovingTongue said:
Now he's scared as fuck of crossing me any more.

Kinda like everyone else who's blundered into my path and got left smouldering on the roadside.

"If Canada invaded the US looking for WMD's (funny, how we've got plenty of those!) and Al Qaeda connections (hello, Dubya anyone? OIL industry, anyone?), there'd be rape rooms GALORE and even guillotines set up all over the country, and I'd be one of the first to build a head chopper to welcome our Canadian wanna-be masters. I love killing people, especially invaders and bullies. No use in denying that. Hell, I'd probably kill the Americans running the rape rooms AND the invaders, too. I'd be in anger management heaven. And you know what? The American citizen asshats collaborating with the invaders (Canadian or otherwise) would get a mail bomb or two in their box from me." - me

"You're extolling rape rooms." - Phrodeau




Yup, you're an idiot, Phrodeau, and now you're going to have a hundred people rushing in here to make idiots of themselves trying to rewrite the dictionary.

Or you're going to have a lot of people looking at you, seeing how much of a real dumbass you are, and slinking away without saying a word so as to not hurt your feelings.

LOL!
:rolleyes:

Celebrating being right is fine I guess, try to cut down on being tedious.
 
LovingTongue said:
<scared as fuck of crossing me any more.

Kinda like everyone else who's blundered into my path and got left smouldering on the roadside.>

did you read this before posting it? doesn't sound very sane honey :(
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
Kinda like you did LT when I asked for your definition of a "neo-con".
lol...you mean where he avoids the question and makes up an answer to suit himself?
 
dolf said:
did you read this before posting it? doesn't sound very sane honey :(
So you think I was praising rape rooms, too?

How dumb can you get? :rolleyes:
dear God, don't answer that.
 
BlueEyesInLevis said:
Kinda like you did LT when I asked for your definition of a "neo-con".
Neo cons are by nature "feel good Conservatives" - typically men whose masculinity has been threatened and who typically endorse any political ideology that makes them look cowboyish, tough and badassed, even if it defies all manner of common sense. They typically take the "What would John Wayne do?" approach to all issues.

That's the third time I have correctly answered your question.

Feel free to make an even bigger ass of yourself by accusing me of running away from your challenges.
 
Gringao said:
Who would have thought you were a squealing groupie of al-Zarqawi?
Who would have thought you would vote for Michael "Jimmy Carter is right" Badnarik, whom you yourself said was a kook?
 
LovingTongue said:
Who would have thought you would vote for Michael "Jimmy Carter is right" Badnarik, whom you yourself said was a kook?

Elections are often this way, with the choices between kooks, creeps and thieves. I picked kook this time as a default. You picked thug because you wanted to.
 
I didn't think you were extolling rape rooms. That's based on your comment of "Hell, I'd probably kill the Americans running the rape rooms AND the invaders, too. I'd be in anger management heaven." But I don't know why there's rape rooms anyways. I suppose it's for ugly invaders to get laid?
 
storm1969 said:
I didn't think you were extolling rape rooms. That's based on your comment of "Hell, I'd probably kill the Americans running the rape rooms AND the invaders, too. I'd be in anger management heaven." But I don't know why there's rape rooms anyways. I suppose it's for ugly invaders to get laid?
Exactly. He only mentioned them because he hopes for them. Hell, there weren't even rape rooms "GALORE" in Iraq.
 
phrodeau said:
Exactly. He only mentioned them because he hopes for them. Hell, there weren't even rape rooms "GALORE" in Iraq.
ROTFLMAO.

<phrodeau logic on> You only ever mention me because you like me. <phrodeau logic off>
Damn, that's got to be the weakest argument ever. If I am going to extol something, I am going to outright praise it. I have never been the kind of person to be ambiguous, if I like it I'll come out and say it, if I despise it, you'll know by the big fat boot that drops in the toilet when you go to take a shit.

Oh yeah and there are probably a lot of rape rooms in Iraq - most of which you won't hear about because the press out there doesn't give a flip about women.

Please, entertain me with more of your semantic suicide charges.
 
I wasn't proven wrong, I didn't chicken out and I didn't disappear.

You hit the trifecta on this thread.
 
phrodeau said:
Exactly. He only mentioned them because he hopes for them. Hell, there weren't even rape rooms "GALORE" in Iraq.

Well, there's assumptions in that statement. Since he said he'd kill them, I thought the opposite.

And I have no idea about them in Iraq or how galore would be defined.
 
storm1969 said:
Well, there's assumptions in that statement. Since he said he'd kill them, I thought the opposite.
Phrodeau's argument of the day: LT kills what he extols.



What's the difference between Phrodeau and a suicide bomber? At least the suicide bomber kills more than himself...
 
You could acomplish so much more if you could learn to use your powers for good. Its never too late to turn back from the dark side.
 
bronzeage said:
You could acomplish so much more if you could learn to use your powers for good. Its never too late to turn back from the dark side.
I refuse to listen to lectures about the dark side from people who think killing someone for having a rape room means extolling rape rooms. The hypocrisy of what you're saying nullifies your point.
 
LovingTongue said:
Neo cons are by nature "feel good Conservatives" - typically men whose masculinity has been threatened and who typically endorse any political ideology that makes them look cowboyish, tough and badassed, even if it defies all manner of common sense. They typically take the "What would John Wayne do?" approach to all issues.

That's the third time I have correctly answered your question.

Feel free to make an even bigger ass of yourself by accusing me of running away from your challenges.
Once again you have merely DESCRIBED them, not DEFINED them. I suggest you reenter 3rd grade to understand the difference.
 
Back
Top