JustSkye
Gatinha
- Joined
- Aug 16, 2003
- Posts
- 45,537
But guessing Cheney wasn't?
I'd still like to know who you really are.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
But guessing Cheney wasn't?
I'd still like to know who you really are.
Not Necessarily. I think he wants us to "know".
UsA USa![]()
...sort of a magazine summary of some stuff, and I came across this passage:
It struck me as awfully familiar in some ways, a set of tactics I've seen recently in various places and realms.
Of whom does this passage make you think?
I'll reveal the source and who it was referencing in a while. I'm curious to see who people associate with these tactics. Who do you think of?
While it definitely fits the fascists (which was my first thought) I could see it applying to Iran as well.
I was reading "The International Social Turn:Unity and Brotherhood at the World’s Parliament of Religions, Chicago, 1893"...a tightly controlled press;
the use of ethnic scapegoats to build majority support;
a mutually beneficial alliance among industry, the army, and the government;
the co-optation of religious leaders;
the use of diplomatic crises and foreign wars to create national unity.
break it down now.
...a tightly controlled press;
the use of ethnic scapegoats to build majority support;
a mutually beneficial alliance among industry, the army, and the government;
the co-optation of religious leaders;
the use of diplomatic crises and foreign wars to create national unity.
break it down now.
HahahahaDavid Ben-Gurion?
I was reading "The International Social Turn:Unity and Brotherhood at the World’s Parliament of Religions, Chicago, 1893"
It has snippets of some of this in it.
But guessing Cheney wasn't?
Project for the New American Century - Principle Statement 1997
Our aim is to remind Americans of these lessons and to draw their consequences for today. Here are four consequences:
• we need to increase defense spending significantly if we are to carry out our global
responsibilities today and modernize our armed forces for the future;
• we need to strengthen our ties to democratic allies and to challenge regimes hostile to our interests and values;
• we need to promote the cause of political and economic freedom abroad;
• we need to accept responsibility for America's unique role in preserving and extending an international order friendly to our security, our prosperity, and our principles.
Such a Reaganite policy of military strength and moral clarity may not be fashionable today. But it is necessary if the United States is to build on the successes of this past century and to ensure our security and our greatness in the next.
Elliott Abrams Gary Bauer William J. Bennett Jeb Bush
Dick Cheney Eliot A. Cohen Midge Decter Paula Dobriansky Steve Forbes
Aaron Friedberg Francis Fukuyama Frank Gaffney Fred C. Ikle
Donald Kagan Zalmay Khalilzad I. Lewis Libby Norman Podhoretz
Dan Quayle Peter W. Rodman Stephen P. Rosen Henry S. Rowen
Donald Rumsfeld Vin Weber George Weigel Paul Wolfowitz
...sort of a magazine summary of some stuff, and I came across this passage:
It struck me as awfully familiar in some ways, a set of tactics I've seen recently in various places and realms.
Of whom does this passage make you think?
I'll reveal the source and who it was referencing in a while. I'm curious to see who people associate with these tactics. Who do you think of?
...Of whom does this passage make you think?
...sort of a magazine summary of some stuff, and I came across this passage:
It struck me as awfully familiar in some ways, a set of tactics I've seen recently in various places and realms.
Of whom does this passage make you think?
I'll reveal the source and who it was referencing in a while. I'm curious to see who people associate with these tactics. Who do you think of?