Should Existing Child Porn be Legalized?

Cap’n AMatrixca said:
No, it's all freedom of speech or it's okay to outlaw flag burning.

How quickly you lose the spirit of the ACLU on "certain" issues...

If I created it on the computer, any similarities to anybody living, or dead, or purely coincidental.

I've had some fun here, but now it's time to go work on my art and get some sweatin' done while it's still under 90...

;) ;) :kiss:

No, it's you being silly, silly. Your posts are about as cogent as the opening post of the thread. Stop it.
 
Darktan said:
A_J, Ulaven wants to know how you would feel about some stranger using your daughter's likeness in a CGI child porn movie.. or hell even bathtub baby shots for publication as "fiction".

He also says to pass the salt, and stay on your side of the table. And quit sticking your tongue out during dinner.


Neither one of us would ever be in the position to know about it and I simply cannot abandon Objectivity over hypotheticals. UD just has a hard-on for me because I won't "debate" him until he matures enough to hold a conversation in which no one has to win and no one has to lose. He's the zero-sum game of Lit thought and cannot even recognize the simple vehicle of The Devil's Advocate.


LIttle man's complex: Attack, attack, always attack.
 
bisexplicit said:
Whether or not the child sees the image, when it is presented in a sexual manner, it is harmful.

Yes, that's the point. SOMEONE saw the image.

Yes, a tree that falls in the forest, makes sound.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
I've had some fun here, but now it's time to go work on my art and get some sweatin' done while it's still under 90...

;) ;) :kiss:

Have a wondeful day, dear! :rose: :rose: :rose: :) :) :)
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Neither one of us would ever be in the position to know about it and I simply cannot abandon Objectivity over hypotheticals. UD just has a hard-on for me because I won't "debate" him until he matures enough to hold a conversation in which no one has to win and no one has to lose. He's the zero-sum game of Lit thought and cannot even recognize the simple vehicle of The Devil's Advocate.


LIttle man's complex: Attack, attack, always attack.

Oh please, you address hypotheticals constantly. Just not the ones that you can't answer truthfully and still maintain your heavily fortified position.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Neither one of us would ever be in the position to know about it and I simply cannot abandon Objectivity over hypotheticals. UD just has a hard-on for me because I won't "debate" him until he matures enough to hold a conversation in which no one has to win and no one has to lose. He's the zero-sum game of Lit thought and cannot even recognize the simple vehicle of The Devil's Advocate.


LIttle man's complex: Attack, attack, always attack.

Ulaven, A_J says you're a little man and something about a hard on. I wasn't paying attention. But I think it was an insult. Or maybe he's coming on to you.
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
Silly Goose laughing at the Gander.

I'm stopping...

now. :kiss:

That whole goose and gander thing is sooo stupid. Now go do some work while I goof off. :D
 
Cap’n AMatrixca said:
and cannot even recognize the simple vehicle of The Devil's Advocate.


LIttle man's complex: Attack, attack, always attack.

well i don't know about UVL or whatever. but yes - so many fail to understand the devil's advocate practise for opening up a debate to hear all sides.

and small man syndrome, hahaha - yes, i know some of those :)
 
Darktan said:
Ulaven, A_J says you're a little man and something about a hard on. I wasn't paying attention. But I think it was an insult.

Oh I see his posts. I have no problem addressing his stance, he just chooses to snipe at me from the cover of ignore.

There's only one coward in this equation. :D
 
Ulaven_Demorte said:
Oh I see his posts. I have no problem addressing his stance, he just chooses to snipe at me from the cover of ignore.

There's only one coward in this equation. :D

I know, but I was having fun. :(
 
sophieloves said:
well i don't know about UVL or whatever. but yes - so many fail to understand the devil's advocate practise for opening up a debate to hear all sides.

and small man syndrome, hahaha - yes, i know some of those :)

It's Poppy!
 
Ulaven_Demorte said:
Do carry on. Far be it from me to stop a monkey from throwing feces. :cool:

It seems A_J is gone so I have nobody to interpret for anyway.

I guess I'll just go spread more rumors that you and Reci are the same person.
 
Darktan said:
It seems A_J is gone so I have nobody to interpret for anyway.

I guess I'll just go spread more rumors that you and Reci are the same person.

You aren't fooling anyone you know. You're one of the collective too.
 
Darktan said:
It seems A_J is gone so I have nobody to interpret for anyway.

I guess I'll just go spread more rumors that you and Reci are the same person.

Can't I get a new rumor?

I'm tired of that one.

Can I be a secret agent?
 
Ulaven_Demorte said:
You aren't fooling anyone you know. You're one of the collective too.

I knew you were a commie. I am calling McCarthy right now!
 
Ulaven_Demorte said:
You aren't fooling anyone you know. You're one of the collective too.

I know.

But I cover my own involvement up by spilling our secrets.

Clever, huh?
 
Recidiva said:
Can't I get a new rumor?

I'm tired of that one.

Can I be a secret agent?

A rumor's not a rumor that doesn't die.

And no.

You can be a gatekeeper though?
 
Joaquin1975 said:
I knew you were a commie. I am calling McCarthy right now!

No, we're borgs and bots.

Anyone that agrees with anybody else on any subject MUST be brainwashed.

We couldn't possibly have come to the same conclusion independently.
 
Darktan said:
I know.

But I cover my own involvement up by spilling our secrets.

Clever, huh?

I am calling all the terrorist monkies. They are going to shoot nanas at you.
 
Recidiva said:
It's Poppy!


me? poppy? well since i'm sophie and have only been here a short while, it may come as something of a surprise to you that i am only me. i don't NEED to be anyone's alt. i'm enough for me and quite enough for those i mail with here, lol.

but i also know what your small ploy was, reci - you want to throw that out there so as to undermine what i've said about you and your arguments here and in other posts. so, if you can convince other members that i am an alt of some member you delight in slagging off as an alcohic madwoman, then they won't take anything i have to say seriously. nice try but weak. i don't NEED to be poppy or anyone else. i am here and i am me and i am sophie. deal with it, baby. xx
 
sophieloves said:
me? poppy? well since i'm sophie and have only been here a short while, it may come as something of a surprise to you that i am only me. i don't NEED to be anyone's alt. i'm enough for me and quite enough for those i mail with here, lol.

but i also know what your small ploy was, reci - you want to throw that out there so as to undermine what i've said about you and your arguments here and in other posts. so, if you can convince other members that i am an alt of some member you delight in slagging off as an alcohic madwoman, then they won't take anything i have to say seriously. nice try but weak. i don't NEED to be poppy or anyone else. i am here and i am me and i am sophie. deal with it, baby. xx

Sweetheart, it's a joke, I don't care. Proved it by only reading your first sentence.

Have a nice day now.
 
Back
Top