SCOTUS: Obamacare stays! Trump's failure is complete.

RoryN

You're screwed.
Joined
Apr 8, 2003
Posts
60,871
7-2 against Republican challenge from TX and other states.

Breaking.

Hee hee hee!
 
7-2 against Republican challenge from TX and other states.

Breaking.

Hee hee hee!

I was told that they replaced it with something better...maybe that was just the wind
 
So, what you're saying, is that you're perfectly happy paying MORE TAXES as long as it makes Trump look bad, right?

https://jeffduncan.house.gov/full-list-obamacare-tax-hikes


Full List of Obamacare Tax Hikes

Complied by Americans for Tax Reform

WASHINGTON, DC -- Obamacare contains 20 new or higher taxes on American families and small businesses. Arranged by their respective sizes according to CBO scores, below is the total list of all $500 billion-plus in tax hikes (over the next ten years) in Obamacare, their effective dates, and where to find them in the bill.

$123 Billion: Surtax on Investment Income (Takes effect Jan. 2013): A new, 3.8 percent surtax on investment income earned in households making at least $250,000 ($200,000 single). This would result in the following top tax rates on investment income:




Capital Gains


Dividends


Other*

2012


15%


15%


35%

2013+


23.8%


43.4%


43.4%


*Other unearned income includes (for surtax purposes) gross income from interest, annuities, royalties, net rents, and passive income in partnerships and Subchapter-S corporations. It does not include municipal bond interest or life insurance proceeds, since those do not add to gross income. It does not include active trade or business income, fair market value sales of ownership in pass-through entities, or distributions from retirement plans. The 3.8% surtax does not apply to non-resident aliens. (Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 87-93)

$86 Billion: Hike in Medicare Payroll Tax (Takes effect Jan. 2013): Current law and changes:




First $200,000
($250,000 Married)
Employer/Employee


All Remaining Wages
Employer/Employee

Current Law


1.45%/1.45%
2.9% self-employed


1.45%/1.45%
2.9% self-employed

Obamacare Tax Hike


1.45%/1.45%
2.9% self-employed


1.45%/2.35%
3.8% self-employed

Bill: PPACA, Reconciliation Act; Page: 2000-2003; 87-93


$65 Billion: Individual Mandate Excise Tax and Employer Mandate Tax (Both taxes take effect Jan. 2014):

Individual: Anyone not buying “qualifying” health insurance as defined by Obama-appointed HHS bureaucrats must pay an income surtax according to the higher of the following




1 Adult


2 Adults


3+ Adults

2014


1% AGI/$95


1% AGI/$190


1% AGI/$285

2015


2% AGI/$325


2% AGI/$650


2% AGI/$975

2016 +


2.5% AGI/$695


2.5% AGI/$1390


2.5% AGI/$2085

Exemptions for religious objectors, undocumented immigrants, prisoners, those earning less than the poverty line, members of Indian tribes, and hardship cases (determined by HHS). Bill: PPACA; Page: 317-337


Employer: If an employer does not offer health coverage, and at least one employee qualifies for a health tax credit, the employer must pay an additional non-deductible tax of $2000 for all full-time employees. Applies to all employers with 50 or more employees. If any employee actually receives coverage through the exchange, the penalty on the employer for that employee rises to $3000. If the employer requires a waiting period to enroll in coverage of 30-60 days, there is a $400 tax per employee ($600 if the period is 60 days or longer). Bill: PPACA; Page: 345-346

(Combined score of individual and employer mandate tax penalty: $65 billion)

$60.1 Billion: Tax on Health Insurers (Takes effect Jan. 2014): Annual tax on the industry imposed relative to health insurance premiums collected that year. Phases in gradually until 2018. Fully-imposed on firms with $50 million in profits. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,986-1,993

$32 Billion: Excise Tax on Comprehensive Health Insurance Plans (Takes effect Jan. 2018): Starting in 2018, new 40 percent excise tax on “Cadillac” health insurance plans ($10,200 single/$27,500 family). Higher threshold ($11,500 single/$29,450 family) for early retirees and high-risk professions. CPI +1 percentage point indexed. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,941-1,956

$23.6 Billion: “Black liquor” tax hike (Took effect in 2010) This is a tax increase on a type of bio-fuel. Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 105

$22.2 Billion: Tax on Innovator Drug Companies (Took effect in 2010): $2.3 billion annual tax on the industry imposed relative to share of sales made that year. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,971-1,980

$20 Billion: Tax on Medical Device Manufacturers (Takes effect Jan. 2013): Medical device manufacturers employ 360,000 people in 6000 plants across the country. This law imposes a new 2.3% excise tax. Exempts items retailing for <$100. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,980-1,986

$15.2 Billion: High Medical Bills Tax (Takes effect Jan 1. 2013): Currently, those facing high medical expenses are allowed a deduction for medical expenses to the extent that those expenses exceed 7.5 percent of adjusted gross income (AGI). The new provision imposes a threshold of 10 percent of AGI. Waived for 65+ taxpayers in 2013-2016 only. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,994-1,995

$13.2 Billion: Flexible Spending Account Cap – aka “Special Needs Kids Tax” (Takes effect Jan. 2013): Imposes cap on FSAs of $2500 (now unlimited). Indexed to inflation after 2013. There is one group of FSA owners for whom this new cap will be particularly cruel and onerous: parents of special needs children. There are thousands of families with special needs children in the United States, and many of them use FSAs to pay for special needs education. Tuition rates at one leading school that teaches special needs children in Washington, D.C. (National Child Research Center) can easily exceed $14,000 per year. Under tax rules, FSA dollars can be used to pay for this type of special needs education. Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,388-2,389

$5 Billion: Medicine Cabinet Tax (Took effect Jan. 2011): Americans no longer able to use health savings account (HSA), flexible spending account (FSA), or health reimbursement (HRA) pre-tax dollars to purchase non-prescription, over-the-counter medicines (except insulin). Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,957-1,959

$4.5 Billion: Elimination of tax deduction for employer-provided retirement Rx drug coverage in coordination with Medicare Part D (Takes effect Jan. 2013) Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,994

$4.5 Billion: Codification of the “economic substance doctrine” (Took effect in 2010): This provision allows the IRS to disallow completely-legal tax deductions and other legal tax-minimizing plans just because the IRS deems that the action lacks “substance” and is merely intended to reduce taxes owed. Bill: Reconciliation Act; Page: 108-113

$2.7 Billion: Tax on Indoor Tanning Services (Took effect July 1, 2010): New 10 percent excise tax on Americans using indoor tanning salons. Bill: PPACA; Page: 2,397-2,399

$1.4 Billion: HSA Withdrawal Tax Hike (Took effect Jan. 2011): Increases additional tax on non-medical early withdrawals from an HSA from 10 to 20 percent, disadvantaging them relative to IRAs and other tax-advantaged accounts, which remain at 10 percent. Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,959

$0.6 Billion: $500,000 Annual Executive Compensation Limit for Health Insurance Executives (Takes effect Jan. 2013): Bill: PPACA; Page: 1,995-2,000
 
No, as long is it makes health care more affordable to more people.

About what I'd expect from someone like you who probably who's so incompetent that you can't hold a decent paying job and has to depend on big gov handouts to survive.
 
The Nine Bishops fucked up bad on another one though. That one is an example of why we need a way to overturn or nullify their rulings.
 
The Nine Bishops fucked up bad on another one though. That one is an example of why we need a way to overturn or nullify their rulings.

How would that be constitutionally possible?

You realize, I hope, that if the same issue on Obamacare were submitted to a referendum, it would end the same way. The SCOTUS is not at odds with public opinion here.
 
Last edited:
Hey dude

3. Do not upload copyrighted images or post articles in their entirety. Fair use laws allow some posting of copyrighted material, such as excerpts from articles and screen captures from movies, under certain circumstances. Please do a Google search under "Fair Use" if you want to understand this issue better.
 
The Nine Bishops fucked up bad on another one though. That one is an example of why we need a way to overturn or nullify their rulings.

You realize, I hope, that if the same issue on Obamacare were submitted to a referendum, it would end the same way. The SCOTUS is not at odds with public opinion here.

Different case Pecker Sniffer. The one where The Bishops and The Nun said a Government MUST cater to a religious extremist group who openly discriminates.
 
What makes this so disappointing for the GOP is that the whole reason they were obsessed with confirming all those judges was for the purpose of writing unpopular conservative policy into law without actually having to do it themselves.
 
Then, again, formerly- Republicans were only pretending
to dislike President Obama's heath care insurance.

They had Democrats doing all of the donkey-work
of patching together a plan that could actually succeed.

Because, formerly- Republicans were too busy betraying our nation, and stashing cash,
distributing hidden cash, and finding new sources for secret cash, for themselves.

(They had four years to come up with Trump's "better plan." Zilch, nothing, no where to be seen.)
 
Trump is the GOP

There's no distinction between the two. Both their voters and politicians have made that crystal clear. :cool:


I see the TDS afflicted are still triggered into not recognizing the difference between POTUS and Congress.

It must be hard to be THAT triggered all the time.
 
I see the TDS afflicted are still triggered into not recognizing the difference between POTUS and Congress.

It must be hard to be THAT triggered all the time.

Yes, because Trump is not directing them all and that's why they're all sucking his.cock at mar.la go on the daily....

Trump is the GOP....whether you admit it or not is irrelevant
 
No surprise at all. Most observers expected this

1. It was a narrow decision that ruled on standing, not the severance question. The court ruled the plaintiffs were not directly harmed, hence did not have standing to sue.
2. It continues a string of unanimous decisions, adding further proof that SCOTUS is NOT broken, contrary to claims from the left who dream of packing the court.
3. ACB voted with the majority, contrary to claims by Kamala Harris who insisted that her nomination before the election was a shameless ploy to overturn the ACA.
4. The most egregious parts of the ACA were thrown out by Obama and Trump via wavers both administrations employed, as well as the TCJA which eliminated the individual mandate.
 
7-2 against Republican challenge from TX and other states.

Breaking.

Hee hee hee!

Beautiful!! Love it!!!! Next step....single payer national healthcare!!!

Celebrate good times come on...it's a celebration!
 
Obamacare is unconstitutional on its face, no matter how the Justices want to dodge the question with phony "standing" rulings.
 
Back
Top