Scientists discover that climate-change skeptics are bozos

[Peregrinator]

What's the matter Perg, didn't understand the paper? Didn't read it? Do you even know what the area of 'uncertainty' is about? Didn't pay attention to the citations that show that that one paper references 20 others, that in turn reference even more? Papers that you could have easily followed up on had you the inclination, or were even a little bit curious about.

Did it occur to you that this paper is just one in an ongoing debate concerning Precambrian atmospheric CO2 concentrations?

I've posted tons of data, none of which you find acceptable so you continually assert that I've posted none at all. You're beginning to look foolish.

Ishmael

Evidently you didn't read or understand it. All scientific papers reference other papers.

Now, once again, for the studio audience, let's revisit the moment when you lost ll credibility in the discussion:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost...5&postcount=32

*chuckle*

Nice try Perg. I'm going to refute each and every single point that you posted, and I'm going to do it with data captured by many scientists that were out to support the whole AGW theory. Obviously this is going to take some time.

A paper about the PreCambrian CO2 concentration does not come close to refuting every point I posted in that thread, and anyone with half a brain can see that.

You have refuted not a single point I posted in that thread. You have not posted a shred of data "captured by" even a single "scientist that (was) out to prove the whole AGW theory."

Are you ever going to back up your words? Or are you just going to keep repeating that you did, hoping that eventually everyone will believe it?

Or maybe just have another tantrum and call me some more names?

*chuckle*

 

[zipman]

Evidently you didn't read or understand it. All scientific papers reference other papers.

Now, once again, for the studio audience, let's revisit the moment when you lost ll credibility in the discussion:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost...5&postcount=32



A paper about the PreCambrian CO2 concentration does not come close to refuting every point I posted in that thread, and anyone with half a brain can see that.

You have refuted not a single point I posted in that thread. You have not posted a shred of data "captured by" even a single "scientist that (was) out to prove the whole AGW theory."

Are you ever going to back up your words? Or are you just going to keep repeating that you did, hoping that eventually everyone will believe it?

Or maybe just have another tantrum and call me some more names?

*chuckle*

This is the gift that keeps on giving.

 

[phrodeau]

Not 'science' per se', but an interesting article none the less. Especially if you've been following the Sun spot cycle.

Cooling down?

Ishmael

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201107280027

 

[Very_Bad_Man]

I'm still not buying it.

Scientist once believed that the moon was made out of cheese.

 

[phrodeau]

Scientist were once certain the earth was flat.

Just sayin.

I'm still not buying it.

Scientist once believed that the moon was made out of cheese.

Revisionist.

 

[Peregrinator]

http://mediamatters.org/blog/201107280027

So Ish calls an op-ed piece promulgating a common lie "interesting."

Predictable.

 

[Ishmael]

Evidently you didn't read or understand it. All scientific papers reference other papers.

Now, once again, for the studio audience, let's revisit the moment when you lost ll credibility in the discussion:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost...5&postcount=32



A paper about the PreCambrian CO2 concentration does not come close to refuting every point I posted in that thread, and anyone with half a brain can see that.

You have refuted not a single point I posted in that thread. You have not posted a shred of data "captured by" even a single "scientist that (was) out to prove the whole AGW theory."

Are you ever going to back up your words? Or are you just going to keep repeating that you did, hoping that eventually everyone will believe it?

Or maybe just have another tantrum and call me some more names?

*chuckle*

I haven't run out of names.....you can worship at the church of your choice, just don't ask me to subsidize your religion.........ever.

Ishmael

 

[Peregrinator]

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=37990855&postcount=32

*chuckle*

Nice try Perg. I'm going to refute each and every single point that you posted, and I'm going to do it with data captured by many scientists that were out to support the whole AGW theory. Obviously this is going to take some time.

Having utterly failed to produce any such data, you can always fall back on ad hominem allegations of religious thought, despite the fact that the denialist side is far closer to religious behavior on the issue.


Or you could post the data you promised and stop lying about it. Or you could admit you were full of shit.

*chuckle*

 

[Peregrinator]

Evidently you didn't read or understand it. All scientific papers reference other papers.

Now, once again, for the studio audience, let's revisit the moment when you lost ll credibility in the discussion:

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost...5&postcount=32

*chuckle*

Nice try Perg. I'm going to refute each and every single point that you posted, and I'm going to do it with data captured by many scientists that were out to support the whole AGW theory. Obviously this is going to take some time.

A paper about the PreCambrian CO2 concentration does not come close to refuting every point I posted in that thread, and anyone with half a brain can see that.

You have refuted not a single point I posted in that thread. You have not posted a shred of data "captured by" even a single "scientist that (was) out to prove the whole AGW theory."

Are you ever going to back up your words? Or are you just going to keep repeating that you did, hoping that eventually everyone will believe it?

Or maybe just have another tantrum and call me some more names?

*chuckle*

I guess he went with the "tantrum" option.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=39088424&postcount=16

According to 'Actual' measurements CO2 is now .0329 atmospheric concentration. It was once 10% to 23% concentration (depending on the researcher, or Perg's ability to read)

Take actions according to your religious beliefs.

Don't enact laws that would make me behave according to your religious belief.

I'm of not of your church, and I'm on the verge of being ready to defend my belief to the death if comes to that fact

And if it comes to that fact, you will be the first that I hunt down to protect my freedoms. Because you have no stance at all, you are nothing. All things to all men, but more especially women. It's your fort'e, like the Hollywood faggot in the lead of "American Gigalo, or (this is nuts, I had to dredge up "Mystic Pizza" to get to Julia Roberts) to get to Gere.

I saw your skeleton post. I guess I missed the skeletons of Hitler, Attila, Ted Bundy, Hitler, Mao, whatever. What a shallow suck up.

You should be far too mature to behave in such an immature fashion, unless your thing is little girls, and I'm beginning to get that notion.

Ishmael

With even a veiled threat and an overt flinging of the "faggot" slur. Very impressive indeed. Is this the post of a man who's won an argument with rational discussion and scientific evidence? Closer, perhaps, to a religious zealot?

 

[zipman]

I guess he went with the "tantrum" option.

http://forum.literotica.com/showpost.php?p=39088424&postcount=16

With even a veiled threat and an overt flinging of the "faggot" slur. Very impressive indeed. Is this the post of a man who's won an argument with rational discussion and scientific evidence? Closer, perhaps, to a religious zealot?

LOL, that is definitely not the post of a man who has won an argument with rational discussion or with scientific evidence. And you're right, it does come resemble that of a religious zealot.

Although considering how you bitch slapped him, I can understand how his ego and arrogance would lead him to make threats and wild accusations about defending his freedom. Apparently, information and science are a threat to him.

This just keeps getting better. Thanks Perg. This is pure gold.

 

[Peregrinator]

LOL, that is definitely not the post of a man who has won an argument with rational discussion or with scientific evidence. And you're right, it does come resemble that of a religious zealot.

Although considering how you bitch slapped him, I can understand how his ego and arrogance would lead him to make threats and wild accusations about defending his freedom. Apparently, information and science are a threat to him.

This just keeps getting better. Thanks Perg. This is pure gold.

Time to strap on the explosives and get to killin' infidels.

He seems to waver between me having the science wrong and me standing to profit somehow by infringing on his personal freedom. He just can't accept that neither are true. And then when he gets nowhere with that I'm a metrosexual, a trust fund kid, a faggot, a pedophile, "all things to all people." That last is especially amusing, because included in that set is "everything Ishmael ever dreamed of."