Sci/Fi Art Thread

Queersetti said:
Dorkiest. Thread. Ever.

I find it ironic (and by ironic I mean hypocritical) that someone who is supposedly so tolerant of alternative lifestyles and objects to discrimination against homosexuals would turn right around and treat others that way.

Besides, you're a gay man. Aren't you supposed to like dorks?
 
Well it ain't as detailed because it ain't as big.

The bigger the model, the more detail you can add...
 
Stuponfucious said:
I find it ironic (and by ironic I mean hypocritical) that someone who is supposedly so tolerant of alternative lifestyles and objects to discrimination against homosexuals would turn right around and treat others that way.

Besides, you're a gay man. Aren't you supposed to like dorks?

Ah, but I am entirely supportive of the right of dorks to pursue their dorkiness to their dorky hearts content. I oppose any discrimination against dorks in hiring, housing or accommodation, and I fully support the right of dorks to marry each other. I even support their rights to raise children and serve in the military, though they rarely do.
 
Stuponfucious said:
I find it ironic (and by ironic I mean hypocritical) that someone who is supposedly so tolerant of alternative lifestyles and objects to discrimination against homosexuals would turn right around and treat others that way.

Besides, you're a gay man. Aren't you supposed to like dorks?
Ding ding ding ding ding ding ding.
Prize for Stup!
 
LovingTongue said:
Face it dude, Stupes got ya.

Then again I've been telling ya the same thing for a while now, but you didn't get it.

So, it is your contention that having shitty taste in entertainment is as basic a component of identity as sexuality?

I didn't think even you were that stupid.
 
Queersetti said:
So, it is your contention that having shitty taste in entertainment is as basic a component of identity as sexuality?

I didn't think even you were that stupid.
Again you fail to grasp how Stupes handed you your ass.

This is about lifestyle acceptance.

You push lifestyle acceptance with your war against homophobia. But then you oppose it when you say trekkies have a shitty taste in entertainment.

Oh and one can make as good an argument that one's likeness for sci fi is genetic as one can make that homosexuality is genetic as one can make that any long term behavior pattern is genetic. But in no case has anyone ever found a homosexual gene any more than they've found a sci-fi gene or a gangsta rapper gene.

So in the end it defaults to a lifestyle choice, does it not?
 
LovingTongue said:
Again you fail to grasp how Stupes handed you your ass.

This is about lifestyle acceptance.

You push lifestyle acceptance with your war against homophobia. But then you oppose it when you say trekkies have a shitty taste in entertainment.

Oh and one can make as good an argument that one's likeness for sci fi is genetic as one can make that homosexuality is genetic as one can make that any long term behavior pattern is genetic. But in no case has anyone ever found a homosexual gene any more than they've found a sci-fi gene or a gangsta rapper gene.

So in the end it defaults to a lifestyle choice, does it not?

OK, you are that stupid, I'm sorry I implied otherwise.
 
Poor Q, backed into a corner again not just by one but two people. Now ya gotta pull a Neal Boortz. How does that feel?
 
LovingTongue said:
Poor Q, backed into a corner again not just by one but two people. Now ya gotta pull a Neal Boortz. How does that feel?

Go play with your action figures, dork.
 
Did you know that the final scene of Star Wars was specifically patterned after the Nuremberg rally in Triumph of the Will?
 
Back
Top