Scarlett Johannson nude

[gizmoo69]

I had to post this because I'm in love with her, but is the picture real or fake? You decide...

Brace yourself...

 

[android1966]

Well I'd have to say fake. I quickly brought up a few headshots of Scarlet and she has a small birthmark on her neck in the three photo's I looked at which is absent here.

On the other hand who really cares? Whoever owns that body it is dynamite. Been writing a few threads to Gunde's story Druuna recently and I like to have a mental picture of the characters involved and that photo is perfect for how I'd imagine his character Nat to look.

 

[Torg]

She also appears in recent threads in the number 1 story of July, Absolute Power.

 

[whizzper]

Did you look at that girl's legs? Scarlett has more meat on her bones than that.

This girls face is a bit gaunt to be Scarlett, and there's something about the nose that doesn't sit right.

However, as a tit man those are magnificent. And I'm imagining her lips wrapped around...mmmm...gotta go.

 

[Torg]

I think this model is bustier than Scarlett, and not as high of cheekbones.

 

[Gunde]

Fake. It's a bloody good fake though, and the first time that I've found Scarlett attractive at all. Makes me wish I knew the model's name.

android: I picture Nat as being a few years older.

Torg: You keep claiming that, do you have any proof?

whizzper: would you be so kind as to rate two of my threads. I'm currently at 665 ratings, and a little superstitious

 

[Denrik]

That is a very good fake, though fake none the less =] Great body regardless though.

 

[gizmoo69]

I don't know you guys, maybe it's hope against hope but to me it really does look real. I can't make out any telltale signs of a cleverly photoshopped pic, which means it's either a lookalike or a VERY good photoshopper.

Either way, great boobs

 

[TJChurch]

I'm a troll.

 

[Anarchy4all]

Great boobs, awful pic... Quality-of-the-"shop"-wise.

Look around the neck area; It's painfully obvious that each pic was "cut" & reattached.

Are you referring to the marks on the neck, or the fact that one row of tiles in the back suddenly contains larger tiles, or what?

Also, it may just be the light, but her eyes appear to be different shades of green. And is that a hair from nowhere or a shadow cast by nothing on the left side of her neck (that's her left by the way)?

My opinion: fake, but pleasing to the eyes.

 

[TJChurch]

I'm a troll.

 

[Anarchy4all]

I said "neck" because it's what I meant.

It mustn't be too pleasing if you're looking at the tiles.

1.) You said "neck area," that gives a rather large area to search for whatever sign you're talking about.

2.) As pleasing as it is, you can only look at one pic so many times before you get bored.

 

[TJChurch]

I'm a troll.

 

[Anarchy4all]

1] "Neck area"... Of the person; If there was no person, no matter who it was/claimed to be, there'd be no point in even taking the picture.

2] Bored? No. Wood? Yes, & wood remains a solid.

1.) "Neck area" can be read as "the neck" or "area around the neck," the latter includes some of the tiled wall behind her.

2.) Bored does not always mean no wood. Is it appealing? Yes. Does it change? No. Do I still do all the work? Yes. Does this pic help me any more than a girlfriend, a stripper, a movie, or my imagination? No. It was fun at first, but now my mind doesn't need the pic, therefore I'm bored with it.

 

[TJChurch]

I'm a troll.

 

[Anarchy4all]

1] Agreed. But (ask any doctor) still refers to the area on the person.

2] I find it hard (no pun intended) to believe you're bored w/it when you seem nowhere near tired of discussing it.

1.) I didn't know which definition you meant, so I had to play with both possibilities.

2.) The discussion of the pic is not the same as the pic itself, therefore shouldn't be compared. Furthermore, I stated previously, "but now my mind doesn't need the pic," should be proof enough I'm not bored with the model, I'm just bored with the pic itself.

 

[TJChurch]

I'm a troll.

 

[jakelyon]

Confused

So now I am confused is Scarlette Johannson hot or not! All this fancy talk about what means what is going over my head!!

 

[TJChurch]

I'm a troll.

 

[Torg]

Scarlett: Hot
That pic: Not Scarlett.

That pic: Still Hot.

 

[Anarchy4all]

1] "Play" is the word; It was simply an attempt to be cute, & "attempt" is the word because it failed.

2] If you're bored with the pic & not the model, you'd be discussing the latter more & the former less; Precisely my point.

1.) It's not being cute, it's simply a lack of evidence and the resulting investigation to find more, which you still haven't helped at all (recall, we started with me asking you a question and you've yet to give me any new evidence in the form of an answer). If your problem is with how I talk/type, get over it, I've got a problem with the way you carry yourself and I'm not making anything out of it.

2.) This discussion has next to nothing to do with the pic, it has everything to do with the fact that you've yet to answer a simple question that would allow me to know if I saw what you saw and the fact that you seem to be enjoying your attempts to bat me down and make me the fool.

 

[TJChurch]

I'm a troll.

 

[GoodBoy741]

1.) You guys have taken a minor miscommunication and blown it way out of proportion.

2.) Please just shake hands and let it go.

 

[Anarchy4all]

1] We started with you asking a question, & me answering it. You then (you now say) went on an investigation, which I (again you say) haven't helped, largely because I either don't know what you're trying to find out, don't knw a reason for such an investigation, or something else.

2] The thread is to discuss the pic. (Torg, I must respectfully disagree.) If you don't want to discuss it, then go have yourself made a fool of elsewhere. (I'm not taking any credit for something you seem perfectly capable of doing solo.)

1.) Tell me, how did you answer it? You said, "There's a sign of shopping in the neck area," to which I asked, "Which sign, this one, that one, or what one?" You said, "Neck area, and you clearly aren't enjoying the pic." All you did with your "answer" is try to bat me down. And tell me, what was so hard to figure out? All you hard do do was say, "Oh, I meant this sign."

2.) What I was investigating is exactly how bad the shopping is. This should have been easy to figure out since all I did after a bit was look at the pic for the signs and ask about which signs you saw.

3.) Tell me, how is it anything you've said to me following my initial comment related to this pic? All we did is discuss the meaning of "neck area," whether or not I enjoyed the pic (which considering you didn't post it, I can't imagine why this would matter to you), and you just bashing me. And if I'm the fool, wouldn't I have been the one to create this tangent in the topic, not you?

4.) Allow me to go one step above your level and make an accusation that actually has minor evidence supporting it. You clearly don't like me for some reason, and given the nature of the site that unites us, it either has something to do with my post or my threads. Since you seem to be the superior erotica author (simply based on what little of yours I've read), I'll say my threads have nothing to do with it, and it has everything to do with the post. I don't know why you would feel a compulsion to say something based on the post, I've said nothing to bash you so there's no motive, but this is assuming the motive behind your accusations is hatred or envy. I'm willing to bet you're just trying to assert your authority here, and my simple post was just another means for you to do that, only with me as the target this time, and the way you carry yourself certainly, with an air of superiority to all users, supports this idea. This manner of behavior and these actions are tell tale signs of an inferiority complex, and all of your threads that I've read create the same impression. So that's my theory on you, and your reaction to this will be all the proof I need to seal a yes or no in my mind.

 

[TJChurch]

I'm a troll.