Kurokami
An Erotic A.I
- Joined
- Jan 19, 2011
- Posts
- 1,296
I think intellectual property is “bullshit” because you may as well call it intellectual control. Yes it may be a great idea in a setting of starving artists and honest people, but let’s be real, that is not the world we live in. Intellectual property opens the door to many dirty and damaging practices, for example monopolies on very important things, potentially things such as wheat, corn, even water. The day that becomes reality would be infamous for sure.
I'm honestly not sure what this means: are you saying that one might gain a copyright over the concept of wheat or water? Besides which, yes, intellectual property is definitely intellectual control. It's controlling in that it says "this here is my idea, don't fucking steal it." It's intellectual control in the same way laws preventing theft are property control.
Of course education also factors in on this. Pay per read, pay per view, pay per everything, more expensive schooling for less people, as we already see. One college text book can now cost more than tuition use to for one semester, and that is factoring inflation.
Yes, that's right: you pay for the things you want to own. The expense of something doesn't justify theft either. Because cars? Those are really expensive, and I don't own one. But I'd like to...
Is it really so farfetched to find a way of compensating those who make contributions to public property?
But it's not public property, even if one were getting compensated for it. Taking Keroin as an example, she spent the time doing the writing, she jumped through the hoops to get it published, she expended the effort to create the work. How is it any less hers because it's merely an idea that's been transcribed onto paper? How is that writing a public work, yet a farmer's cattle is private property, as is everything in a supermarket? Despite their intangible nature, ideas don't just come out of nowhere, fully formed. It takes time and effort to write something, to say nothing of the production side that comes with filming a movie or recording an album, and the creators of such things deserve to be compensated and furthermore, to exert some control over what is definitely their property. Like it or not, we live in a capitalist society where people own the things they sell.
On piracy, it’s not just young generations and “this is mine” attitude. I could turn the same argument and claim old people are just technophobes and stuck in the past. Remember taping, that was piracy, or lending a book to someone, or even selling used books. The internet just facilitates communication to a revolutionary degree, and we are still trying to find ways of working with it. You can’t stop change, you have to adapt to it.
No, no, you're right: if something is old, it can't be a crime. That's why murder is legal
Honestly, I'm not trying to sound like a surly git here, because I honestly don't want to come off as confrontational with you Captor, but this idea is really flawed.

