Sad, sweet love story

G

Guest

Guest
I adore Buddy Holly; his wife is gorgeous still. - Perdita

Love at first sight that even tragedy couldn't destroy - Buddy Holly's widow protects his legacy 45 years after his death
- Joel Selvin, Chronicle Senior Pop Music Critic - June 12, 2004

Maria Elena Santiago was working as a temporary receptionist at the Brill Building music publishing firm run by her aunt when Buddy Holly showed up for a meeting at the office.

"When he came though those doors, it was bang -- love at first sight," says his widow, in town last week for the opening of "Buddy: The Buddy Holly Story," a musical at the Post Street Theatre based on the life and music of her late husband, who died in a plane crash at age 22 in 1959.

He asked her out, but she had never before been on a date. Her parents died when she was young and she grew up with her strict, protective aunt in New York City. After considerable negotiations, her aunt agreed to allow the date. Holly proposed marriage to the beautiful Maria Elena on that first date and she accepted.

Six months later, he was dead and his pregnant wife miscarried when she heard the news on TV. "Who would expect such a thing?" says his still- beautiful 69-year-old Maria Elena.

She lives today in the tony Turtle Creek section of Dallas. Her second husband died 15 years ago ("That's another whole chapter," she says). She raised three children and has three young grandchildren. "But they don't call me grandma," she says firmly. For the past 45 years, she has been the able protector, defender and promoter of the legacy of the man to whom she was married for a couple of dozen happy, hectic weeks when they were just crazy kids.

"I froze there for a long time," she says in her lightly accented voice. "It was very difficult to listen to his music, to have anybody talking about him or asking me questions about him. But then I realized that this guy wanted people to know about his music."

She is a petite, trim woman, sweetly perfumed, in short, auburn hair and a tailored black suit. Her easy smile lights up her unlined face when she laughs, undoubtedly the same million-dollar smile that captivated the quiet, lanky Texas rock 'n' roller on that first date at the Upper East Side restaurant P.J. Clarke's. They moved into a Greenwich Village apartment only blocks from where Maria Elena grew up.

"He loved the neighborhood," she says. The two wandered the coffee houses and nightclubs of the area, soaking up the candlelit poetry readings and late- night jazz shows that must have seemed a long, long way from the West Texas nights he knew before.

They were on top of the world. Maria Elena, who set aside her own Broadway dreams when she met her husband, brought her music business savvy to the partnership and they were making plans for the future. She had contacted Lee Strasberg of the Actors Studio about acting lessons for her husband, who wanted to score movies, as well as act in them. He was making ambitious records in New York, adding strings and horn orchestrations to his rock 'n' roll songs. The couple had taken over management of his career, and Holly was producing records with other artists such as his bass player, Waylon Jennings. But the plane crash in the frozen Iowa tundra that February midnight brought it all to an end.

His music, however, lived. Despite a career lasting less than two years after his first record hit the charts, Buddy Holly's music became a central touchstone for all that followed. The Beatles may or may not have taken their name from Holly's backup group, the Crickets, but they definitely recorded his "Crying, Waiting, Hoping" on their first recorded audition. Paul McCartney later acquired all of Holly's music publishing rights.

The first hit single by the Rolling Stones was a Buddy Holly song, "Not Fade Away," also a key piece in the repertoire of the Grateful Dead. Bob Dylan, accepting his Grammy Award, thanked Holly, whom he saw perform on the fateful Winter Dance Party tour at the Duluth National Guard Armory. Holly was portrayed memorably by actor Gary Busey in a 1978 movie, "The Buddy Holly Story." The musical currently at the Post Street Theatre first opened in 1989 in London, where it ran for 13 years. There is a statue and the Buddy Holly Center in his hometown of Lubbock, Texas.

"People are still talking about him," Santiago says. "The music is still fresh, still going. His songs were simple, but there are no two alike."

His wife is not just the executor of the estate; she is the keeper of the flame. She attends most of the musical premieres and loves taking curtain calls with the "Buddy" cast, kicking them up at the end of the show like the dancer she has always been (this grandmother recently started taking kick- boxing lessons). The part she hates is getting up early for TV morning-show interviews, but she will often just wear dark glasses through the ordeal. "That's show business," she says.

She personally lobbied for a Texas bill to protect the rights to likeness of deceased celebrities after she saw Elvis Presley toilet paper being advertised for sale; the piece of landmark legislation is popularly known as "The Buddy Holly Law" because of her efforts. Her late husband's copyrights may have made her a comfortable woman long after his youthful death, but she does him proud.

Forty-five years later, his character and presence is fresh and vivid in her mind. She can describe him physically ("He was 6 feet tall, lean and lanky") and emotionally ("He was very quiet and reserved, but he was not shy"). Their youth is fixed in her mind and she clearly remains in his thrall.

"He must have been an old soul," says Santiago. "Otherwise how would he have been able to accomplish so much in such a short time?"

article with pics
 
I wonder if she would like you to do a Buddy and Her lit story?
 
Buddy is still one of my all time favourite musicians.

When I die I'm going to have a few words with God, asking why she took Buddy, Jim Croce and Stevie Ray Vaughan away from us so soon.
 
I had many of his records but they wore out long ago. Now I play the CDs.

I went to the show when it came to a local theatre. The place was jumping just like 1959 with people of my apparent age to kids of 10 years old dancing in the aisles.

Who cared for 'Health and Safety Regulations'? The ushers/usherettes were jiving too. It was a wonderful night out and Buddy's music was still as moving as it was the first time I heard it.

Og
 
rgraham666 said:
Buddy is still one of my all time favourite musicians.

When I die I'm going to have a few words with God, asking why she took Buddy, Jim Croce and Stevie Ray Vaughan away from us so soon.

You forgot somebody. I've been heard fussing about the death of Hendrix; "if he'd lived just 5 more damn years!" He died while my mother was pregnant with me. SRV was also a big Hendrix fan and covered many of his songs.
 
I have often read and heard of Buddy Holly as "A Rock and Roll Pioneer" but I never thought of him that way when I listened to rock and roll music in the fifties. This is NOT to say anything negative about him because I liked his music allright but I always thought of Buddy Holly as one of the crowd, rather than a pioneer. I believe his biggest hit was "Peggy Sue" and it came along in late 1957. The genre was already well-established by that time, dominating the standings on the TV show "Your Hit Parade". "Rock Around the Clock" was a big hit more than two years earlier than "Peggy Sue". Elvis Presley, among others, had sold tens of millions of records before Buddy Holly achieved fame.

The article in the first post suggests that The Beatles copied their name from Buddy's backup group, The Crickets. I understand that "beatle" is a British slang term, the equivalent of "beatnik" in the US. That would make Beatles totally unrelated to Crickets.

He may have been a successful song writer also. That is not a thing I paid any attention to but he still was not a pioneer because, as I said, the genre was already well-established before he came along.

I don't like to rain on anybody's parade but I do like to keep the record accurate.
 
Boxlicker101 said:
I don't like to rain on anybody's parade but I do like to keep the record accurate.
Well, Box, you got me all wet. :mad: And not that way. P.
 
Boxlicker101 said:


The article in the first post suggests that The Beatles copied their name from Buddy's backup group, The Crickets. I understand that "beatle" is a British slang term, the equivalent of "beatnik" in the US. That would make Beatles totally unrelated to Crickets.


I don't know about the rest of your comments but The Beatles acknowledged their debt to Buddy Holly (and others).

Crickets/Beatles was said to be linked in their thinking when changing from 'The Quarrymen'.

From this side of the Atlantic Buddy Holly was a distinctive voice, among other greats, yes. He was not seen as lesser but equally revered - at the time. What he might have been we'll never know. What he was, we knew then and The Beatles knew better than most of us.

Through relations working in the Merchant Navy and in Liverpool Docks the Beatles had access to US records, including minor labels, that few of us had at the time and their then musical knowledge of 1950s US music, white and black, should not be underestimated.

Og
 
Boxlicker101 said:
I don't like to rain on anybody's parade but I do like to keep the record accurate.

Buddy Holly may not have been there at the creation, but he was one of those who separated the light from the darkness, and for a guy who had so little time in the limelight, he cast a remarkably long shadow.

As far as I'm concerned, it was Little Richard and Chuck Berry who really invented the kind of music we now call rock and roll. Elvis was just too rockabilly. To listen to Little Richard do "Long Tall Sally" is to look into the molten face of pure rock. He deserves a hell of a lot more credit than he gets. And what a life he's led!

Buddy Holly was really recording some bad stuff around the time of his death. He must have been looking for a number one hit or something, because he was doing all this treacly stuff with strings. I have a feeling that had he lived he would have become a main-stream pop balladeer, because that seemed to be what he'd set his sights on, and that's too bad.

---Zoot
 
dr_mabeuse said:
Buddy Holly may not have been there at the creation, but he was one of those who separated the light from the darkness, and for a guy who had so little time in the limelight, he cast a remarkably long shadow.

As far as I'm concerned, it was Little Richard and Chuck Berry who really invented the kind of music we now call rock and roll. Elvis was just too rockabilly. To listen to Little Richard do "Long Tall Sally" is to look into the molten face of pure rock. He deserves a hell of a lot more credit than he gets. And what a life he's led!

Buddy Holly was really recording some bad stuff around the time of his death. He must have been looking for a number one hit or something, because he was doing all this treacly stuff with strings. I have a feeling that had he lived he would have become a main-stream pop balladeer, because that seemed to be what he'd set his sights on, and that's too bad.

---Zoot

:) I would never say anything negative about Buddy Holly, just that I don't think of him as a pioneer. I agree with what you say about Little Richard and Chuck Berry. I was always envious of Uncle John for his relationship with Long, Tall sally. I think the Everly Brothers deserve more credit than they usually get also. The number one guy, as far as being a pioneer, will always be Bill Haley with his recordings of "Shake, Rattle and Roll", "See Ya Later, Alligator" and, especially, "Rock Around the Clock".

At one time the genre was called "Rockabilly" and has roots in folk music, country/western, and jazz. Some of Elvis's earlier songs were strongly influenced by country, maybe up to "Heartbreak Hotel", but by the late fifties, his rocking was as hard as anybody's.

I have my doubts that Buddy Holly would have made it as a pop balladeer. I don't think his voice was mellow enough but that is calling on memory, which is highly imperfect.
 
Boxlicker101 said:
I have often read and heard of Buddy Holly as "A Rock and Roll Pioneer" but I never thought of him that way when I listened to rock and roll music in the fifties. This is NOT to say anything negative about him because I liked his music allright but I always thought of Buddy Holly as one of the crowd, rather than a pioneer. I believe his biggest hit was "Peggy Sue" and it came along in late 1957. The genre was already well-established by that time, dominating the standings on the TV show "Your Hit Parade". "Rock Around the Clock" was a big hit more than two years earlier than "Peggy Sue". Elvis Presley, among others, had sold tens of millions of records before Buddy Holly achieved fame.

The article in the first post suggests that The Beatles copied their name from Buddy's backup group, The Crickets. I understand that "beatle" is a British slang term, the equivalent of "beatnik" in the US. That would make Beatles totally unrelated to Crickets.

He may have been a successful song writer also. That is not a thing I paid any attention to but he still was not a pioneer because, as I said, the genre was already well-established before he came along.

I don't like to rain on anybody's parade but I do like to keep the record accurate.

The Beatles did cover Holly's stuff. "Words of Love" comes to mind, and I think there may have been another by Lennon alone.

Words of Love is a cool song, but it's a silly recurring circular one. Holly did better writing, but it's one of his hookiest, I think.
 
dr_mabeuse said:
Buddy Holly may not have been there at the creation, but he was one of those who separated the light from the darkness, and for a guy who had so little time in the limelight, he cast a remarkably long shadow.

As far as I'm concerned, it was Little Richard and Chuck Berry who really invented the kind of music we now call rock and roll. Elvis was just too rockabilly. To listen to Little Richard do "Long Tall Sally" is to look into the molten face of pure rock. He deserves a hell of a lot more credit than he gets. And what a life he's led!

Buddy Holly was really recording some bad stuff around the time of his death. He must have been looking for a number one hit or something, because he was doing all this treacly stuff with strings. I have a feeling that had he lived he would have become a main-stream pop balladeer, because that seemed to be what he'd set his sights on, and that's too bad.

---Zoot

Yo Zoot

Holly and Janis were the ones people pointed to in the sixties for what not to let be done to you by the label. Holly was selected by his label for special treatment. He was cut out from his friends, the ones he came in with, the Crickets, and he was recorded without them, on overproduced albums, as you point out. The desperately looking for a hit feel of that album without the Crickets is just exactly that. It was a record-company-produced cockup.

The word was that Holly should have refused but he sold out. There can be a lot of pressure.

Janis let herself be cored out from Big Brother to make Pearl, same way. By contrast, some people told the label to piss off. Tom Petty for example still has the guys that he started with.

He's not a "pioneer" but Gene Vincent, Eddie Cochran, and those guys, whom you dismiss as rockabilly, were. There's a lot of country in the earliest white-boy rock, and it was the rockabilly people who opened the door for R&B. Ray Charles is counted as a father of rock and roll with an album called "New Trends in Country Western Music," of all the stupid titles.

cantdog
 
Back
Top