Carl East said:I can't help thinking there for, that there's got to be a balance between the two. The solution to this sort of catastrophe, in my humble opinion, would be to have a sort of international rescue agency designed around just this sort of event.
At least then, everybody would see it as their job, and nobody would think it was interference, and of course it would be funded by the world.
Carl.
Carl, the organization that you are describing does exist, in part, as the United Nations. However, when all the members Nations unite for any certain cause, some grumblings can be heard about America(!) always putting our nose where it doesn't belong. That leaves the Red Cross and private agencies, like various missionary groups and ex-Navy Seal vigilantes, to try to fill in the gaps. Not exactly reassuring to those caught in crises.
~~~~~
Also, even if there aren't nuclear weapons on that sub, there are nuclear reactors aboard, and if they are comprimised... Chernobyl revisited. For that reason alone, we should have been more involved right from the start. I think the whole world can do without radioactive sperm whales