StillStunned
Mr Sticky
- Joined
- Jun 4, 2023
- Posts
- 10,420
No need to apologise. This is the whole point of the thread. And thanks for your input: as I noted at the start, the snippet is from an attempt to be more descriptive than I usually am, and I'm struggling to find the right balance.You are obviously a more-than-competent writer, but I think you also have a tendency to overwrite, to hold your language to the light to admire its glittering facets. I do not share that fascination; I want to hear about the people in the story more than the places they visit or to admire the ... glitter.
If you're already good, how could you be better? I think the title you have given to this thread indicates that you are open to honest or even extensive criticism. Please don't take it the wrong way, 'cause I'll be merciless. Apologies in advance.
 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 I will be accepting some of your changes into the final product!
 I will be accepting some of your changes into the final product! Obviously, you could not have known that! Would "rubies" be far too extravagant of a word?
 Obviously, you could not have known that! Would "rubies" be far too extravagant of a word?
 
 
		 Would something like that frustrate a lot of readers, you think? The world is too complicated (perhaps needlessly) that if I'd explain everything right away, there'd likely be too much exposition happening. I tend to favour a steady story flow.
 Would something like that frustrate a lot of readers, you think? The world is too complicated (perhaps needlessly) that if I'd explain everything right away, there'd likely be too much exposition happening. I tend to favour a steady story flow. 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		 
 
		