Rihanna's Sparkly See-Through Dress...

3113

Hello Summer!
Joined
Nov 1, 2005
Posts
13,823
Seems like something we might have made up in one of our erotic stories...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2014/06/Was8671093-607x1024.jpg

It is a "not there" if-you've-got-it-flaunt-it dress, of course, but it does have some fabulous about it (i.e. it's just fishnets and crystals, but it isn't just fishnets and crystals ;)). I like the roaring 20's look with headdress, gloves and fox fur. I predict gloves and similar headdresses being all the rage. More images here.
 
I think this looks owes more credit to her personal trainer than her fashion designer.
 
Let's move on to some male stars doing this is transparent tuxedos.
 
Last edited:
Let's move on to some mail stars doing this is transparent tuxedos.

I'm not sure I'd want to see any of the postal employees I know in a transparent tuxedo. :p

(Yes, I know what you meant to write)

But I'm thinking, considering the low hem of that dress, that Rihanna is one awkward back-step away from having a more revealing Janet Jackson moment . . . .
 
I'm not sure I'd want to see any of the postal employees I know in a transparent tuxedo. :p

(Yes, I know what you meant to write)

But I'm thinking, considering the low hem of that dress, that Rihanna is one awkward back-step away from having a more revealing Janet Jackson moment . . . .

Oops. Good catch. I corrected it.
 
I'm not sure I'd want to see any of the postal employees I know in a transparent tuxedo. :p

(Yes, I know what you meant to write)

But I'm thinking, considering the low hem of that dress, that Rihanna is one awkward back-step away from having a more revealing Janet Jackson moment . . . .
Uh... Never mind. I reread what you wrote and found that I didn't read what I thought you wrote. :eek:
 
Last edited:
It's very, very pretty, but I think it's a bit too long.
 
Originally Posted by sr71plt View Post
Let's move on to some mail stars doing this is transparent tuxedos.

Mail? is transparent tuxedos?

Two errors in one short post? Shame on you Pilot. And as you've pointed out many times in the past, you can't even blame one of those small screen smart phones for those errors. Maybe if you'd used the correct words people would know what the hell you're talking about.

Now don't go get snarky for being called out on that.
 
But I'm thinking, considering the low hem of that dress, that Rihanna is one awkward back-step away from having a more revealing Janet Jackson moment . . . .
I'm amazed that the thread going down the back kept that dress on as is. But I guess she wouldn't have really revealed much more if it had fallen off. And there was always the fox fur there to help her play peek-a-boo :devil:
 
I'm amazed that the thread going down the back kept that dress on as is. But I guess she wouldn't have really revealed much more if it had fallen off. And there was always the fox fur there to help her play peek-a-boo :devil:

Just think: were that to happen, you could use a picture of it as your next AV. I think it would fit your theme. ;)
 
Looks like a dress designed to attract you with what's there to distract you from what's NOT there. ;)
 
Back
Top