Rihanna's Sparkly See-Through Dress...

[3113]

Seems like something we might have made up in one of our erotic stories...


http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2014/06/Was8671093-607x1024.jpg

It is a "not there" if-you've-got-it-flaunt-it dress, of course, but it does have some fabulous about it (i.e. it's just fishnets and crystals, but it isn't just fishnets and crystals ). I like the roaring 20's look with headdress, gloves and fox fur. I predict gloves and similar headdresses being all the rage. More images here.

 

[walkerlong]

I think this looks owes more credit to her personal trainer than her fashion designer.

 

[sr71plt]

Let's move on to some male stars doing this is transparent tuxedos.

 

[Aynmair]

I think this looks owes more credit to her personal trainer than her fashion designer.

And don't forget genetics...

 

[slyc_willie]

Let's move on to some mail stars doing this is transparent tuxedos.

I'm not sure I'd want to see any of the postal employees I know in a transparent tuxedo.

(Yes, I know what you meant to write)

But I'm thinking, considering the low hem of that dress, that Rihanna is one awkward back-step away from having a more revealing Janet Jackson moment . . . .

 

[sr71plt]

I'm not sure I'd want to see any of the postal employees I know in a transparent tuxedo.

(Yes, I know what you meant to write)

But I'm thinking, considering the low hem of that dress, that Rihanna is one awkward back-step away from having a more revealing Janet Jackson moment . . . .

Oops. Good catch. I corrected it.

 

[TxRad]

I'm not sure I'd want to see any of the postal employees I know in a transparent tuxedo.

(Yes, I know what you meant to write)

But I'm thinking, considering the low hem of that dress, that Rihanna is one awkward back-step away from having a more revealing Janet Jackson moment . . . .

Uh... Never mind. I reread what you wrote and found that I didn't read what I thought you wrote.

 

[glynndah]

It's very, very pretty, but I think it's a bit too long.

 

[Swilly]

Originally Posted by sr71plt View Post
Let's move on to some mail stars doing this is transparent tuxedos.

Mail? is transparent tuxedos?

Two errors in one short post? Shame on you Pilot. And as you've pointed out many times in the past, you can't even blame one of those small screen smart phones for those errors. Maybe if you'd used the correct words people would know what the hell you're talking about.

Now don't go get snarky for being called out on that.

 

[slyc_willie]

Uh... Never mind. I reread what you wrote and found that I didn't read what I thought you wrote.

Now you've got my curiosity piqued . . . .

 

[3113]

I think this looks owes more credit to her personal trainer than her fashion designer.

And don't forget genetics...

Agreed! This dress would be scary on anyone without both good genetics and a good personal trainer.

 

[3113]

Let's move on to some male stars doing this is transparent tuxedos.

I'm all for that...so long as they've got the good genetics and excellent personal trainer

 

[3113]

But I'm thinking, considering the low hem of that dress, that Rihanna is one awkward back-step away from having a more revealing Janet Jackson moment . . . .

I'm amazed that the thread going down the back kept that dress on as is. But I guess she wouldn't have really revealed much more if it had fallen off. And there was always the fox fur there to help her play peek-a-boo

 

[slyc_willie]

I'm amazed that the thread going down the back kept that dress on as is. But I guess she wouldn't have really revealed much more if it had fallen off. And there was always the fox fur there to help her play peek-a-boo

Just think: were that to happen, you could use a picture of it as your next AV. I think it would fit your theme.

 

[Blind_Justice]

Help me out please. Are these ARMS coming out her butt? Or legs?

 

[drteetho]

Looks like a dress designed to attract you with what's there to distract you from what's NOT there.

 

[TxRad]

Help me out please. Are these ARMS coming out her butt? Or legs?

Put you glasses on. That is a fur wrap she is holding behind her, uh, behind.

 

[3113]

Help me out please. Are these ARMS coming out her butt? Or legs?

Put you glasses on. That is a fur wrap she is holding behind her, uh, behind.

LOL. Maybe Blind_Justice is literally blind? Here's a better image of the pale pink fox fur being held behind her, uh, behind

http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp-content/uploads/sites/21/2014/06/495363647-681x1024.jpg

 

[sr71plt]

Howcome there are no photos from the front?

 

[TxRad]

Howcome there are no photos from the front?

There is one but she has panties on.

Check the Post article.

 

[Cruel2BKind]

http://i.kinja-img.com/gawker-media...ogressive,q_80,w_636/q5qazr7eathhazptv5f4.jpg

All sides biatch

 

[sr71plt]

There is one but she has panties on.

Check the Post article.

Why would I want to check it out if she has panties on?

 

[TxRad]

Why would I want to check it out if she has panties on?

Sorry butt it was a thong. I missed one of the rear shots and had to go back and look again. One very very nice ass.

 

[3113]

Howcome there are no photos from the front?

Here ya go. From a different website, as those on the one I posted didn't show all. True that the panty front might make it less interesting...but there are nipples

http://sharpnchic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/rihanna-nude-dress.jpg

 

[TxRad]

Here ya go. From a different website, as those on the one I posted didn't show all. True that the panty front might make it less interesting...but there are nipples

http://sharpnchic.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/rihanna-nude-dress.jpg

And she can sing also.

Deep breaths, deep breaths. Hit those high notes.

Uh, not me, her. I can't carry a tune in a bucket.